Quote:
Originally Posted by RhetoriK
sup Dave!
i hear you there. i started playing MW3 long after it's lifecycle (roughly November of last year) so i don't have any real compass for what's good and bad. i've only got the two games to compare against.
i like domination on MW3. i actually enjoy demolition and hardpoint on Black Ops 2 more (when i play solo, it's tdm though.) i'm just getting to the point where i feel like i'm descent enough to play Search and Destroy on either game, but it's just me and my co-worker buddies playing in a party Friday nights lol we pretty much play whatever. hit me up if you're ever on though. i'm an objective player though, my k/d is a great window into how many flags i jump on lol) good hearing from you man. hit me up sometime.
---------- Post added at 03:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:43 PM ----------
lol you ass, i had a text lounge relevant topic =/
i'm only back for the week (if that) ...good seeing you though.
stay black.
|
I played them all, but never really touched on World At War.
MW1 was great, MW2 was awful, Black Ops 1 was the best, MW3 was awful, Black Ops 2 would have been good, but the levels are shit and A LOT of flaws.
Worst thing of all is spawn camping. I'm almost an expert at it at this stage and it's still a joke. On Villa and Hijacked especially. Easy as fuck to just catch people the second they appear.
Oh I forgot about that, tac incersions were changed as well. Before, you'd have the usual spawn time. On HC at least, you spawn instantly. It's completely unfair. I always tac in, and once I die, I know EXACTLY where to go to get the guy that killed me. I don't have to wait, and he doesn't know where I am. I just reappear straight away in a better position. How is that fair?