King Titles

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

If you write a verse and your opponent doesn't, youre not waiting a month to earn what they took away from you. Thats bullshit. You showed up and they forfeited. Battling 8 times in LBT is almost a year. Cunts shouldn't have to wait 2 years becuase all their opponents act like faggots.

A king title SHOULD be a 2+ year achievement.

Should of never been changed from the original stipulation in the first place.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

If you write a verse and your opponent doesn't, youre not waiting a month to earn what they took away from you. Thats bullshit. You showed up and they forfeited. Battling 8 times in LBT is almost a year. Cunts shouldn't have to wait 2 years becuase all their opponents act like faggots.

A king title SHOULD be a 2+ year achievement.

Should of never been changed from the original stipulation in the first place.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

A king title SHOULD be a 2+ year achievement.

Should of never been changed from the original stipulation in the first place.

Theres an event once a month. You want it to be 10 defences....that equals 2 years?

I think its bullshit to try and bring in Seul. You dont like those rules, cool, thats still the rules and always has been. Pretty sure some people no showed ILLoKWENT too. ITs alright if for some reason you want to punish the guys who show, not sure why you would, but okay, you have an opinion on the currently in place rules and perhaps that could be looked at separately.

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

Perfect solution for me but who knows if people would go for it.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

A king title SHOULD be a 2+ year achievement.

Should of never been changed from the original stipulation in the first place.

Theres an event once a month. You want it to be 10 defences....that equals 2 years?

I think its bullshit to try and bring in Seul. You dont like those rules, cool, thats still the rules and always has been. Pretty sure some people no showed ILLoKWENT too. ITs alright if for some reason you want to punish the guys who show, not sure why you would, but okay, you have an opinion on the currently in place rules and perhaps that could be looked at separately.

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

Perfect solution for me but who knows if people would go for it.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by EtH

But if you want a solution for RULE, just do what we're doing for Rai. Have RULE battle Biz, if he wins, count it as his 6th def with one more to go. If he loses, it counts as 5 defences.

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

And they do count. They would also have counted if someone no showed him, like they have for every other LB_ champion ever.

But that's a separate issue. If you dont like no show wins, cool, make a thread. As it stands they count and Seuls title isnt in question what so ever.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

And they do count. They would also have counted if someone no showed him, like they have for every other LB_ champion ever.

But that's a separate issue. If you dont like no show wins, cool, make a thread. As it stands they count and Seuls title isnt in question what so ever.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

I'd be waiving the consecutive win requirement due to every other guy running this shit being a dumbass and I believe its unfair to strip titles based on people being dumbasses.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

But that still wouldnt be an consecutive win lol

I have 7 LBA title matches that ive won. Whether people think defending it in the scheme tourney should count or not, the LBA host gave me the green light.

And beating someone in a scheme tournament is much MUCH better than winning via no show.

I'd be waiving the consecutive win requirement due to every other guy running this shit being a dumbass and I believe its unfair to strip titles based on people being dumbasses.