So my feeling on a couple of points based off of the feedback here
People seem unwilling to strip people who have already won the title, if thats the case then the strongest way to do that while having as difficult a goal for future people to achieve the title is: You must win seven LBA / LBT title matches. All 5 current holders have done that. You would have to allow for no show victories tho, as Seul only has 5 non-no show wins. The other 4 have seven wins without no shows.
Its seems like the title change from LBA King to LBA Legend is prefered too. I'd agree the termanology for multiple "kings" is weird. Altho Illo might be the one person to deserve the King title.
As for EtH's point on no-shows yeah your right i do strongly dislike them counting as wins. But my opinion is only mine, and if the majority thinks otherwise i'll go with them. Only you and i seem to have posted strong opinions on the matter so would be nice to hear more.
Hosts need to do more in the PPV style. I have suspensions on the THC, i know EtH has only just taken the LBT so i dunno what ur plan is.
Ive never seen a tournament winner have a massive amount of no shows, so i dont think this issue is as prevelant in GC's etc. While the LBT has had probably 40% of there champs crowned on battles they didnt win (through no fault of there own admittedly).
1/
|
Battle Feed
Hybrid Mode
