Titles

That just screws up LB history . Continuity is important. Besides, titles are still sought.

And hof is only obtained via voting /nomination

That just screws up LB history . Continuity is important. Besides, titles are still sought.

And hof is only obtained via voting /nomination

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Row

That just screws up LB history . Continuity is important. Besides, titles are still sought.

And hof is only obtained via voting /nomination

How does it screw up LB history? EVERYTHING is obtained via voting/nomination, including championships and even staff positions

---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:25 PM ----------

Past winners will still be acknowledged in some form by trophies, signatures, a history section, etc.

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Row

That just screws up LB history . Continuity is important. Besides, titles are still sought.

And hof is only obtained via voting /nomination

How does it screw up LB history? EVERYTHING is obtained via voting/nomination, including championships and even staff positions

---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:25 PM ----------

Past winners will still be acknowledged in some form by trophies, signatures, a history section, etc.

Originally Posted by NOBLE

How does it screw up LB history? EVERYTHING is obtained via voting/nomination, including championships and even staff positions

---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:25 PM ----------

Past winners will still be acknowledged in some form by trophies, signatures, a history section, etc.

Sorry wasn't clear enough,

To get hof title, it's not by battling , a thread has to be made and people decide whether one is deserving of it or not, and with all the titles vanquished, how would you even measure one's chances of being hof?

Activity will also greatly go down, because very few people would join a tournament only to have acknowledgement in the form of a signature , and history has shown that.

Specific titles have lost prestige, but titles as a whole didn't. I hate going to NBA illustrations but it's the first thing that came up, but imagine if there were no roty, playoff championships, mvp (season, all star and finals), dunk contest, etc and there was only Hall of Fame? Its those things that draw people (players or fans) to the league. Yes it would make hof more prestigious but the league as a whole will be bland, and competiveness will sink.


Just 2 cents.

Originally Posted by NOBLE

How does it screw up LB history? EVERYTHING is obtained via voting/nomination, including championships and even staff positions

---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:25 PM ----------

Past winners will still be acknowledged in some form by trophies, signatures, a history section, etc.

Sorry wasn't clear enough,

To get hof title, it's not by battling , a thread has to be made and people decide whether one is deserving of it or not, and with all the titles vanquished, how would you even measure one's chances of being hof?

Activity will also greatly go down, because very few people would join a tournament only to have acknowledgement in the form of a signature , and history has shown that.

Specific titles have lost prestige, but titles as a whole didn't. I hate going to NBA illustrations but it's the first thing that came up, but imagine if there were no roty, playoff championships, mvp (season, all star and finals), dunk contest, etc and there was only Hall of Fame? Its those things that draw people (players or fans) to the league. Yes it would make hof more prestigious but the league as a whole will be bland, and competiveness will sink.


Just 2 cents.