Erupt to the thread, please. - Page 4 - Lets Beef

**Babylon** · #31 10-14-2014, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Row

why does that `played bar`always seem to be the reason for big names

I've reported like 5 different people for this exact type of shit and every time people say that I'm a bitch & am grasping at straws. Nothing will happen. As long as it's not too obscure/complex you can bite the fuck out of whoever you want and chock it up to creative coincidence.

**Babylon** · 10-14-2014, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Row

why does that `played bar`always seem to be the reason for big names

I've reported like 5 different people for this exact type of shit and every time people say that I'm a bitch & am grasping at straws. Nothing will happen. As long as it's not too obscure/complex you can bite the fuck out of whoever you want and chock it up to creative coincidence.

**J u s T C** · #32 10-14-2014, 02:09 PM

So just because people didn't agree with you, there's bullshit at play?

**J u s T C** · 10-14-2014, 02:09 PM

So just because people didn't agree with you, there's bullshit at play?

**Obey** · #33 10-14-2014, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

See...that's what I'm talking about. You found out that staff knew about the accusation and you jumped to the conclusion that they didn't discuss it until you were personally told by ILLoKWENT that we did discuss it? You also seem to have jumped to the conclusion that we didn't make a huge announcement about it or that no punitive measures were taken because of Erupt's status and that if it had been someone lesser known, we would have concluded differently? When was the last time you've ever heard a staff member discussing publicly the possibility that someone may have bitten while that accusation was still being considered and they weren't sure? That would be reckless. Usually when threads like that are made, it's by a regular member...not a staff member. There's no point in throwing shade saying Erupt or whoever may have bitten unless we've concluded that they have bitten and are about to hand out an infraction. And trust me, there's no such thing as "status" when it comes to someone breaking the rules of LetsBeef. Anyone can be banned or stripped of their title. If you don't agree with the decision, that's one thing. But I just don't understand why all the assumptions about staff simply because you hadn't heard about it till now.

So I or anyone shouldn't be able to hone our opinions for the matter? Just mods and staff make the judgment..? Letsbeef is a community, everyone should be able to give their opinions on the matter. I worked my ass off to get to the GC and you're telling me I shouldn't know if there's a possible bite in questioning, rather on the biggest stage? Idk man.. Like I said, I was under the impression it was being being looked-away on, than I was corrected and okay w/ the situation.

**Obey** · 10-14-2014, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NOBLE

See...that's what I'm talking about. You found out that staff knew about the accusation and you jumped to the conclusion that they didn't discuss it until you were personally told by ILLoKWENT that we did discuss it? You also seem to have jumped to the conclusion that we didn't make a huge announcement about it or that no punitive measures were taken because of Erupt's status and that if it had been someone lesser known, we would have concluded differently? When was the last time you've ever heard a staff member discussing publicly the possibility that someone may have bitten while that accusation was still being considered and they weren't sure? That would be reckless. Usually when threads like that are made, it's by a regular member...not a staff member. There's no point in throwing shade saying Erupt or whoever may have bitten unless we've concluded that they have bitten and are about to hand out an infraction. And trust me, there's no such thing as "status" when it comes to someone breaking the rules of LetsBeef. Anyone can be banned or stripped of their title. If you don't agree with the decision, that's one thing. But I just don't understand why all the assumptions about staff simply because you hadn't heard about it till now.

So I or anyone shouldn't be able to hone our opinions for the matter? Just mods and staff make the judgment..? Letsbeef is a community, everyone should be able to give their opinions on the matter. I worked my ass off to get to the GC and you're telling me I shouldn't know if there's a possible bite in questioning, rather on the biggest stage? Idk man.. Like I said, I was under the impression it was being being looked-away on, than I was corrected and okay w/ the situation.

**Denton** · #34 10-14-2014, 03:40 PM

I can understand the need to want this discussed. However, Wordplay is available to everyone to use. Word play such as Verbatim/ Verb Ate Em' ; Theres really only one way to use that. Even though the rhyme scheme was the same, his multi's weren't copied. just a played concept bro. TBH Everything in battle rap these days are played concepts that have been used before by SOMEONE whether they were used in a good way or bad.

**Denton** · 10-14-2014, 03:40 PM

I can understand the need to want this discussed. However, Wordplay is available to everyone to use. Word play such as Verbatim/ Verb Ate Em' ; Theres really only one way to use that. Even though the rhyme scheme was the same, his multi's weren't copied. just a played concept bro. TBH Everything in battle rap these days are played concepts that have been used before by SOMEONE whether they were used in a good way or bad.

**Obey** · #35 10-14-2014, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bleu

the rhyme scheme WASNT the same. rupts had an additional syllable to his.. and executed it much better imo

---------- Post added at 04:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------

Edit: This thread can be deleted or closed if @NOBLE or any mod wants to. Now I understand it wasn't a bite and it was dealt with, I'm not trynna taint a GC that was rightfully earned. I probably jumped the gun but had to get my point across.

**Obey** · 10-14-2014, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bleu

the rhyme scheme WASNT the same. rupts had an additional syllable to his.. and executed it much better imo

---------- Post added at 04:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------

Edit: This thread can be deleted or closed if @NOBLE or any mod wants to. Now I understand it wasn't a bite and it was dealt with, I'm not trynna taint a GC that was rightfully earned. I probably jumped the gun but had to get my point across.

#36 10-14-2014, 04:38 PM

[QUOTE=Obey;1058299]

[COLOR="Silver"]

---------- Post added at 04:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------
Lol...

10-14-2014, 04:38 PM

[QUOTE=Obey;1058299]

[COLOR="Silver"]

---------- Post added at 04:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 PM ----------
Lol...

#37 10-14-2014, 04:56 PM

Co sign Bleu. Erupt also used hyphens in his which is truly genius. Lockhart could learn a thing or two.

10-14-2014, 04:56 PM

Co sign Bleu. Erupt also used hyphens in his which is truly genius. Lockhart could learn a thing or two.

**S O U L R I T E** · #38 10-14-2014, 05:00 PM

This thread 😂

**S O U L R I T E** · 10-14-2014, 05:00 PM

This thread 😂

**Obey** · #39 10-14-2014, 05:00 PM

When Erupt let Bleu into LoD and he got to comment on his battle for the 1st time.

**Obey** · 10-14-2014, 05:00 PM

When Erupt let Bleu into LoD and he got to comment on his battle for the 1st time.

#40 10-14-2014, 05:55 PM

Bleu probably printed out rupt's finals verse and hung it on his wall.

10-14-2014, 05:55 PM

Bleu probably printed out rupt's finals verse and hung it on his wall.


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!


	One Bar Championships 2025 Battles ready for vote KRONUS vs Masked-Reaper GodTheReptilian vs Bav Phenomonon vs mister jon flako Blocc vs ahSHHit Zaicwon vs HuNgReeDy BeAsT Phracture vs exwhyzee Ohs vs Lockhart Vote on tournaments to earn +5 credits!