Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
too subjective. What are your thoughts 
|
sub·jec·tive
səbˈjektiv/
adjective
1.
based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
How in the fuck is science in ANY way subjective at all? Science tests things over and over again to get a common result, then, only when there is sufficient evidence for whatever is at hand, is it considered true. Enf or whoever mentioned Religion, Religion is in every way subjective. Religion is purely based upon faith, a feeling / opinion that some unverifiable mystical force with no factual evidence to be based upon is present. Science removes any subjectivity by ever evolving and correcting past errors, Religion stays subjective by emanating dogmatic principles that state something is right / true until the end of time.
Notice that we no longer believe the earth is flat? Yes, this is because even though it was the general populations subjective opinion that the earth was flat science determined that it was in fact spherical. This is why science will never be subjective, it essentially says "Hey, fuck your feelings and opinions. I don't give two shits if you think that the earth is flat, here's demonstrable evidence stating otherwise."
Religion implements dogmatic principles that never evolve, never correct themselves even when new evidence arises infallibly disproving the past discrepancies. I mean, if it wasn't for the social and cultural progression of the human race in recent decades, and we lived by the solemn rule of the bible, slavery would then be completely morally justified as the old and new testament plainly advocates it.