Why voting correctly matters.

[Blue Hulk]

http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=491237 really though? My punch count outweighed his by a ton. Smh... about done with these uneducated voters and being screwed over all the time due to hate voting, shit aint even fair

[Blue Hulk]

http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=491237 really though? My punch count outweighed his by a ton. Smh... about done with these uneducated voters and being screwed over all the time due to hate voting, shit aint even fair

[Student]

Originally Posted by Letum

Nope Go vote on some shit with ya 218 low ass vote count @Student

I actually have voted on 1,431

Originally Posted by Rican

I think Mods should be more pro active on this.

I think all votes that are not broken down should be deleted and voter should be pm'd and tagged in a thread regarding voting procedures.

I think that if a voters goes more than 3 votes that are not broken down. User should receive an infraction.

We can also create template regarding the basic points of voting.

Who knows

Ideas. Ideas

Agree about deleting 1 word votes (FV, VB, GB, etc.) and for the first time in the history of this site this is actually possible since we don't have that many battles going on.

Not sure about infractions, maybe 1 point ones. @NOBLE @Row @Rant @ILLoKWENT @Manhattan @OSKAR for their thoughts on the matter.

Originally Posted by Nowl

http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=491237 really though? My punch count outweighed his by a ton. Smh... about done with these uneducated voters and being screwed over all the time due to hate voting, shit aint even fair

Re-opened the battle for more votes on the count of the voters shouldn't of had the VP they did at the time they voted.

[Student]

Originally Posted by Letum

Nope Go vote on some shit with ya 218 low ass vote count @Student

I actually have voted on 1,431

Originally Posted by Rican

I think Mods should be more pro active on this.

I think all votes that are not broken down should be deleted and voter should be pm'd and tagged in a thread regarding voting procedures.

I think that if a voters goes more than 3 votes that are not broken down. User should receive an infraction.

We can also create template regarding the basic points of voting.

Who knows

Ideas. Ideas

Agree about deleting 1 word votes (FV, VB, GB, etc.) and for the first time in the history of this site this is actually possible since we don't have that many battles going on.

Not sure about infractions, maybe 1 point ones. @NOBLE @Row @Rant @ILLoKWENT @Manhattan @OSKAR for their thoughts on the matter.

Originally Posted by Nowl

http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=491237 really though? My punch count outweighed his by a ton. Smh... about done with these uneducated voters and being screwed over all the time due to hate voting, shit aint even fair

Re-opened the battle for more votes on the count of the voters shouldn't of had the VP they did at the time they voted.

[NOBLE]

As annoying as non-explained votes sometimes are, you would be hurting the site more than helping it by removing every non-expo'd vote. People are lazy and they don't always want to type a paragraph just to explain who they thought won. The fact that they didn't explain it thoroughly doesn't necessarily mean they hadn't given it any thought either. I understand and totally agree that, for the battler, an explained vote is always better than a non-explained one. But voting is scarce. It's hard enough just to get people to vote period. Adding stipulations on top of it....like how long their expos gotta be..is going to make it even more scarce. If it were a choice between having more people on the site vote or having fewer votes because very few people bother to both vote frequently AND always have lengthy expos, I'd rather have more votes. We want to make things easier for people, not harder. I don't support removing people's votes or lowering their VP simply for lack of expo. Just ask them to try to leave more of an expo next time. Lowered VP can last for a long time and it might be a while before they get it raised again. People notice the negative (when someone's voting shittily) a lot more readily than they notice the positive. You have to balance the idealism of wanting everyone to give full lengthy expos with practicality. Everyone ISN'T going to start giving full expos, even if you make that a stipulation and remove their vote. The only thing that's going to do by making it a policy to remove all non-expo'd votes is to decrease overall voting on the site further than it already is.

[NOBLE]

As annoying as non-explained votes sometimes are, you would be hurting the site more than helping it by removing every non-expo'd vote. People are lazy and they don't always want to type a paragraph just to explain who they thought won. The fact that they didn't explain it thoroughly doesn't necessarily mean they hadn't given it any thought either. I understand and totally agree that, for the battler, an explained vote is always better than a non-explained one. But voting is scarce. It's hard enough just to get people to vote period. Adding stipulations on top of it....like how long their expos gotta be..is going to make it even more scarce. If it were a choice between having more people on the site vote or having fewer votes because very few people bother to both vote frequently AND always have lengthy expos, I'd rather have more votes. We want to make things easier for people, not harder. I don't support removing people's votes or lowering their VP simply for lack of expo. Just ask them to try to leave more of an expo next time. Lowered VP can last for a long time and it might be a while before they get it raised again. People notice the negative (when someone's voting shittily) a lot more readily than they notice the positive. You have to balance the idealism of wanting everyone to give full lengthy expos with practicality. Everyone ISN'T going to start giving full expos, even if you make that a stipulation and remove their vote. The only thing that's going to do by making it a policy to remove all non-expo'd votes is to decrease overall voting on the site further than it already is.

Make it an LB culture or a new rule

Make it an LB culture or a new rule

[KingBankstou]

Originally Posted by Rican

I think Mods should be more pro active on this.

I think all votes that are not broken down should be deleted and voter should be pm'd and tagged in a thread regarding voting procedures.

I think that if a voters goes more than 3 votes that are not broken down. User should receive an infraction.

We can also create template regarding the basic points of voting.

Who knows

Ideas. Ideas

... thats a good idea

[KingBankstou]

Originally Posted by Rican

I think Mods should be more pro active on this.

I think all votes that are not broken down should be deleted and voter should be pm'd and tagged in a thread regarding voting procedures.

I think that if a voters goes more than 3 votes that are not broken down. User should receive an infraction.

We can also create template regarding the basic points of voting.

Who knows

Ideas. Ideas

... thats a good idea

[Blue Hulk]

Thanks bro @Student...

Who remembers @Phenomenon's outrageously long breakdowns? People need to peep battles from sometime around like 2012-2013, back when he was in the FVC, and take notes from him, and people like @ILLoKWENT & @Student.

They wasn't playing about that back then, they took voting maaad serious.

[Blue Hulk]

Thanks bro @Student...

Who remembers @Phenomenon's outrageously long breakdowns? People need to peep battles from sometime around like 2012-2013, back when he was in the FVC, and take notes from him, and people like @ILLoKWENT & @Student.

They wasn't playing about that back then, they took voting maaad serious.

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Nowl

Thanks bro @Student...

Who remembers @Phenomenon's outrageously long breakdowns? People need to peep battles from sometime around like 2012-2013, back when he was in the FVC, and take notes from him, and people like @ILLoKWENT & @Student.

They wasn't playing about that back then, they took voting maaad serious.

That was when I ran the FVC and people had to go through voting tournaments just to get in.

[NOBLE]

Originally Posted by Nowl

Thanks bro @Student...

Who remembers @Phenomenon's outrageously long breakdowns? People need to peep battles from sometime around like 2012-2013, back when he was in the FVC, and take notes from him, and people like @ILLoKWENT & @Student.

They wasn't playing about that back then, they took voting maaad serious.

That was when I ran the FVC and people had to go through voting tournaments just to get in.

[10Fold]

I must admit I have frequented boards such as RB RV RW RR RM 6shot and many others, and if I'm honest LB has always stood out as by far the one with the worst voting.

Uneducated retard votes go unpunished, as with Dr's etc.

I'm pretty confident 50 per cent of votes in EVERY battle are peeps following the comment trend and not actually even reading the verse's...

[10Fold]

I must admit I have frequented boards such as RB RV RW RR RM 6shot and many others, and if I'm honest LB has always stood out as by far the one with the worst voting.

Uneducated retard votes go unpunished, as with Dr's etc.

I'm pretty confident 50 per cent of votes in EVERY battle are peeps following the comment trend and not actually even reading the verse's...

[OSKAR]

1 VP for accuracy of comment.

1VP for getting the person and the rate right.

Instead of removing unexpo'd votes just remove VP....

[OSKAR]

1 VP for accuracy of comment.

1VP for getting the person and the rate right.

Instead of removing unexpo'd votes just remove VP....

But the voter should be tagged on this and called out on the forums or something

Like every week make a thread about it

But the voter should be tagged on this and called out on the forums or something

Like every week make a thread about it