|

09-24-2014, 12:17 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Consciousness: A directional solution?
With the topological postulation that time is measurably the fourth dimension, denoted by its directional properties suggested by spacetime, as being parallel to space, what then, would be the necessitating factors for this claim?
First, one must note that the expansion of space is necessary for the measurement of time as a forwardly directional plane, and therefore this must be one such facet of the determination of time as the fourth dimension.
However, furthering from this, I posit that not only are the structural facets of dimensionality hinged on their preceding planes, but, on their proceeding planes, as well. In thus, the perceivability, and subsequent measurement of time as the fourth dimension must be constituted by the presentation of its extending plane, and therefore a fifth dimensional space.
I ask, then, what, if not consciousness is necessary for the measurement, and perceivability of time?
|
09-24-2014, 12:17 PM
|
#1
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Consciousness: A directional solution?
With the topological postulation that time is measurably the fourth dimension, denoted by its directional properties suggested by spacetime, as being parallel to space, what then, would be the necessitating factors for this claim?
First, one must note that the expansion of space is necessary for the measurement of time as a forwardly directional plane, and therefore this must be one such facet of the determination of time as the fourth dimension.
However, furthering from this, I posit that not only are the structural facets of dimensionality hinged on their preceding planes, but, on their proceeding planes, as well. In thus, the perceivability, and subsequent measurement of time as the fourth dimension must be constituted by the presentation of its extending plane, and therefore a fifth dimensional space.
I ask, then, what, if not consciousness is necessary for the measurement, and perceivability of time?
|
|
|

09-24-2014, 12:26 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,066
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 124 Won / 135 Lost
Ranked Text Record 22 Won / 29 Lost
|
@ Rant ,
If consciousness is the experience of space in time, each being completely interdependent planes, the real question in my mind is...
Can these planes be separated more than hypothetically for the sake of observation and documentation?
My immediate instinctual response is to say, "No", but I could easily be wrong.
---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 PM ----------
Or maybe in other words, can they be isolated as planes to be observed independently.
My thought is no, because they are completely interdependent in that one could not exist without the other?
__________________
...and I love you too.

|
09-24-2014, 12:26 PM
|
#2
|
Ranked Audio Record 124 Won / 135 Lost
Ranked Text Record 22 Won / 29 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2011
Voted:
481
audio / 231
text
Posts: 1,066
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
|
@ Rant ,
If consciousness is the experience of space in time, each being completely interdependent planes, the real question in my mind is...
Can these planes be separated more than hypothetically for the sake of observation and documentation?
My immediate instinctual response is to say, "No", but I could easily be wrong.
---------- Post added at 12:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 PM ----------
Or maybe in other words, can they be isolated as planes to be observed independently.
My thought is no, because they are completely interdependent in that one could not exist without the other?
__________________
...and I love you too.

|
Offline
|
|

09-24-2014, 01:05 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
One may exist without another, but, in this regard it would no longer be measured. In order to measure length, one must use width, in order to measure width, one must use depth, in order to measure depth, one must use time, therefore in order to measure time, one must use conscious thought.
|
09-24-2014, 01:05 PM
|
#3
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
One may exist without another, but, in this regard it would no longer be measured. In order to measure length, one must use width, in order to measure width, one must use depth, in order to measure depth, one must use time, therefore in order to measure time, one must use conscious thought.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.
|
|
|