I know ill get a great answer

[Wayco]

Ive messaged a few mods but no reply so ill ask again why'd i lose this battle? I had more votes (2to1) so with so little votes on the battle and me having more votes why did it close out and with me as the loser?http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=562072

[Wayco]

Ive messaged a few mods but no reply so ill ask again why'd i lose this battle? I had more votes (2to1) so with so little votes on the battle and me having more votes why did it close out and with me as the loser?http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=562072

[Wayco]

yea but thats some bullshit. He got ONE fuckin vote and apparently i got2 votes worth 11.5%of 100% so how the fuck does that work? He got one vote Lmao especially when the last vote was for me. so if u want a voting system that scales, how about u put in place one that penalizes people for not voting on battles that have top ten people in it especially ones with stelar records with voting and battle wise..cuz its pretty funny all u have to do is get a crew of dick riders to win. That scaling is bullshit. i won that battle suck my dick. thank you.

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 PM ----------

and for the record 80% of this site is fuckin pussies and use writs and pre meds to battle frees at least i aint no punk ass bitch like that i reply with real shit off the top so wheres the scale for faggotry? cuz a lot of u be fucked in the ass then!! (no pun)

[Wayco]

yea but thats some bullshit. He got ONE fuckin vote and apparently i got2 votes worth 11.5%of 100% so how the fuck does that work? He got one vote Lmao especially when the last vote was for me. so if u want a voting system that scales, how about u put in place one that penalizes people for not voting on battles that have top ten people in it especially ones with stelar records with voting and battle wise..cuz its pretty funny all u have to do is get a crew of dick riders to win. That scaling is bullshit. i won that battle suck my dick. thank you.

---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 PM ----------

and for the record 80% of this site is fuckin pussies and use writs and pre meds to battle frees at least i aint no punk ass bitch like that i reply with real shit off the top so wheres the scale for faggotry? cuz a lot of u be fucked in the ass then!! (no pun)

[Just C]

[QUOTE=wayco;763454]yea but thats some bullshit. He got ONE fuckin vote and apparently i got2 votes worth 11.5%of 100% so how the fuck does that work? He got one vote Lmao especially when the last vote was for me. so if u want a voting system that scales, how about u put in place one that penalizes people for not voting on battles that have top ten people in it especially ones with stelar records with voting and battle wise..cuz its pretty funny all u have to do is get a crew of dick riders to win. That scaling is bullshit. i won that battle suck my dick. thank you.

[Just C]

[QUOTE=wayco;763454]yea but thats some bullshit. He got ONE fuckin vote and apparently i got2 votes worth 11.5%of 100% so how the fuck does that work? He got one vote Lmao especially when the last vote was for me. so if u want a voting system that scales, how about u put in place one that penalizes people for not voting on battles that have top ten people in it especially ones with stelar records with voting and battle wise..cuz its pretty funny all u have to do is get a crew of dick riders to win. That scaling is bullshit. i won that battle suck my dick. thank you.

[Óðinn]

with an attitude like that, you deserve what ever you get...

the voting system is in place to assure that Dick Riders dont end up being the ones to cost ppl there battles....

[Óðinn]

with an attitude like that, you deserve what ever you get...

the voting system is in place to assure that Dick Riders dont end up being the ones to cost ppl there battles....

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL™

with an attitude like that, you deserve what ever you get...

the voting system is in place to assure that Dick Riders dont end up being the ones to cost ppl there battles....

that makes zero sense. being that ur scale does not take into consideration the battlers win loss record. so ur formula just assumes that both mc's are equal and only the voters have any such calculations done. so ur system can only assume that my votes are bad votes and not good ones since it cannot cross reference that battlers. so at the least its very flawed. Second quit being a bitch 2fuel this is a battle site and i will talk shit when the mods are too busy reppin their crew battles instead of throwing more fair votes to compensate for ur flawed system. i mean shit i see more "BragginWrites" in battles then votes or advice. besides that i seen people do some dirty ass shit in battles like post a writ battle full of personals against afreethen u went and deleted the only comment calling it out n then voted against the person cuzudidnt like him..so ur thoughts are worthless. How about u take ur 2 point havin assand vote on sum shit n quit worrying about my attitude.

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL™

with an attitude like that, you deserve what ever you get...

the voting system is in place to assure that Dick Riders dont end up being the ones to cost ppl there battles....

that makes zero sense. being that ur scale does not take into consideration the battlers win loss record. so ur formula just assumes that both mc's are equal and only the voters have any such calculations done. so ur system can only assume that my votes are bad votes and not good ones since it cannot cross reference that battlers. so at the least its very flawed. Second quit being a bitch 2fuel this is a battle site and i will talk shit when the mods are too busy reppin their crew battles instead of throwing more fair votes to compensate for ur flawed system. i mean shit i see more "BragginWrites" in battles then votes or advice. besides that i seen people do some dirty ass shit in battles like post a writ battle full of personals against afreethen u went and deleted the only comment calling it out n then voted against the person cuzudidnt like him..so ur thoughts are worthless. How about u take ur 2 point havin assand vote on sum shit n quit worrying about my attitude.

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Jason

the people battling are totally irrelevant to the voting system
why should the battlers have anything to do with how the 3rd party vote is weighed?

if a voter proves he should have a higher VP than it is granted
if he shows that he is a poor voter than it is lowered

how is this system flawed?

very simply, it assumes from jump that 2 battlers are of equal merit which might not be the case. So when thats combined with ur scaling system for voters it will unfairly scale when theres to few votes on a battle. cuz it assumes that the votes are invalid or less thanwhen in actuality there wasn't enuff votes to accurately decide. cuz in all fairness he only got one vote and i got .3 or a third of a vote so how can the system declare him the winner without 2 full votes being cast? ive never seen a battle end with one vote. so if it wasn't flawed why didn't he just get the win as soon as xanex voted for him? since the battle had been over for a while and my first vote was 0..so really a vote for me was a loss no matter what unless the vote were cast by someone with VP.. but if no one with VP voted in time any other vote for me was an auto loss. Or someone could even reverse hate voted against me and gave me the loss just cuz they have low VP... the better questions how it not flawed?

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Jason

the people battling are totally irrelevant to the voting system
why should the battlers have anything to do with how the 3rd party vote is weighed?

if a voter proves he should have a higher VP than it is granted
if he shows that he is a poor voter than it is lowered

how is this system flawed?

very simply, it assumes from jump that 2 battlers are of equal merit which might not be the case. So when thats combined with ur scaling system for voters it will unfairly scale when theres to few votes on a battle. cuz it assumes that the votes are invalid or less thanwhen in actuality there wasn't enuff votes to accurately decide. cuz in all fairness he only got one vote and i got .3 or a third of a vote so how can the system declare him the winner without 2 full votes being cast? ive never seen a battle end with one vote. so if it wasn't flawed why didn't he just get the win as soon as xanex voted for him? since the battle had been over for a while and my first vote was 0..so really a vote for me was a loss no matter what unless the vote were cast by someone with VP.. but if no one with VP voted in time any other vote for me was an auto loss. Or someone could even reverse hate voted against me and gave me the loss just cuz they have low VP... the better questions how it not flawed?

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Jason

there were enough votes
there were 3 votes
the votes are just different in terms of their effect on the battle

lets say you have a basketball team and 3 of your players suck, doesnt mean they arent contributing to your team. theyre on the team

nawimsayin

ok but as soon as i got my first vote since it was given by someone with 0 VP n the second vote for my comp was a 2vp vote at that point no matter what the 3rd vote said i get an auto loss unless it was a vote given by someone with 2vp. so how is a vote for me an auto loss yet its not flawed? cuz if i never received the first vote from the person with 0vp in the first place the battle would still be up for grabs. so why are people with zero vp allowed to vote? and who decides who has zero vp or not? and can peoples vp be taken away on battles yet decided? seems like a lot of variables to me

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by Jason

there were enough votes
there were 3 votes
the votes are just different in terms of their effect on the battle

lets say you have a basketball team and 3 of your players suck, doesnt mean they arent contributing to your team. theyre on the team

nawimsayin

ok but as soon as i got my first vote since it was given by someone with 0 VP n the second vote for my comp was a 2vp vote at that point no matter what the 3rd vote said i get an auto loss unless it was a vote given by someone with 2vp. so how is a vote for me an auto loss yet its not flawed? cuz if i never received the first vote from the person with 0vp in the first place the battle would still be up for grabs. so why are people with zero vp allowed to vote? and who decides who has zero vp or not? and can peoples vp be taken away on battles yet decided? seems like a lot of variables to me

[UNKNOWN ARTIST]

Originally Posted by wayco

ok but as soon as i got my first vote since it was given by someone with 0 VP n the second vote for my comp was a 2vp vote at that point no matter what the 3rd vote said i get an auto loss unless it was a vote given by someone with 2vp. so how is a vote for me an auto loss yet its not flawed? cuz if i never received the first vote from the person with 0vp in the first place the battle would still be up for grabs. so why are people with zero vp allowed to vote? and who decides who has zero vp or not? and can peoples vp be taken away on battles yet decided? seems like a lot of variables to me

Why do you think a battle closes soon as you get 3 votes

[UNKNOWN ARTIST]

Originally Posted by wayco

ok but as soon as i got my first vote since it was given by someone with 0 VP n the second vote for my comp was a 2vp vote at that point no matter what the 3rd vote said i get an auto loss unless it was a vote given by someone with 2vp. so how is a vote for me an auto loss yet its not flawed? cuz if i never received the first vote from the person with 0vp in the first place the battle would still be up for grabs. so why are people with zero vp allowed to vote? and who decides who has zero vp or not? and can peoples vp be taken away on battles yet decided? seems like a lot of variables to me

Why do you think a battle closes soon as you get 3 votes

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by wayco

that makes zero sense. being that ur scale does not take into consideration the battlers win loss record. so ur formula just assumes that both mc's are equal and only the voters have any such calculations done. so ur system can only assume that my votes are bad votes and not good ones since it cannot cross reference that battlers. so at the least its very flawed. Second quit being a bitch 2fuel this is a battle site and i will talk shit when the mods are too busy reppin their crew battles instead of throwing more fair votes to compensate for ur flawed system. i mean shit i see more "BragginWrites" in battles then votes or advice. besides that i seen people do some dirty ass shit in battles like post a writ battle full of personals against afreethen u went and deleted the only comment calling it out n then voted against the person cuzudidnt like him..so ur thoughts are worthless. How about u take ur 2 point havin assand vote on sum shit n quit worrying about my attitude.

LMFAOOO..... :smh: at the level of stupidity you posses... at the end of the day (its night time) fucking grow up... you win some you lose some... There are FVC (Fair Voters Club) threads made for this exact reason...

Soon as your battles open for votes, post it in every fucking FVC thread... end of story..

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by wayco

that makes zero sense. being that ur scale does not take into consideration the battlers win loss record. so ur formula just assumes that both mc's are equal and only the voters have any such calculations done. so ur system can only assume that my votes are bad votes and not good ones since it cannot cross reference that battlers. so at the least its very flawed. Second quit being a bitch 2fuel this is a battle site and i will talk shit when the mods are too busy reppin their crew battles instead of throwing more fair votes to compensate for ur flawed system. i mean shit i see more "BragginWrites" in battles then votes or advice. besides that i seen people do some dirty ass shit in battles like post a writ battle full of personals against afreethen u went and deleted the only comment calling it out n then voted against the person cuzudidnt like him..so ur thoughts are worthless. How about u take ur 2 point havin assand vote on sum shit n quit worrying about my attitude.

LMFAOOO..... :smh: at the level of stupidity you posses... at the end of the day (its night time) fucking grow up... you win some you lose some... There are FVC (Fair Voters Club) threads made for this exact reason...

Soon as your battles open for votes, post it in every fucking FVC thread... end of story..

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL™

LMFAOOO..... :smh: at the level of stupidity you posses... at the end of the day (its night time) fucking grow up... you win some you lose some... There are FVC (Fair Voters Club) threads made for this exact reason...

Soon as your battles open for votes, post it in every fucking FVC thread... end of story..

honestly most of the fvc is laughable. and what makes no sense?? if u take someones voting rights away they shouldn't be able to vote cuz it causes problems with the system such as any vote cast for me was an auto lost if it wasn't cast by someone with 2vp..if u can't see thats flawed ur an idiot. i give a fuck about losing i just want to lose on sum real shit not to some bullshit default.

[Wayco]

Originally Posted by 2FUEL™

LMFAOOO..... :smh: at the level of stupidity you posses... at the end of the day (its night time) fucking grow up... you win some you lose some... There are FVC (Fair Voters Club) threads made for this exact reason...

Soon as your battles open for votes, post it in every fucking FVC thread... end of story..

honestly most of the fvc is laughable. and what makes no sense?? if u take someones voting rights away they shouldn't be able to vote cuz it causes problems with the system such as any vote cast for me was an auto lost if it wasn't cast by someone with 2vp..if u can't see thats flawed ur an idiot. i give a fuck about losing i just want to lose on sum real shit not to some bullshit default.