Battle Rap and Freestyle Battles at Lets Beef
Menu


 
Start a battle

Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!
 
  Scheme Championships May 2025
  
 
Battle Feed
JbFromthe90s vs Slogo16z
Style: Written
0 Votes No Rating YetNo Rating YetNo Rating YetNo Rating YetNo Rating Yet
ContagiousZ vs JbFromthe90s
Style: Written
1 Vote 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
ContagiousZ vs les bian
Style: Written
3 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
ContagiousZ vs les bian
Style: Freestyle
3 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
ContagiousZ vs les bian
Style: Written
3 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
JbFromthe90s vs Tain
Style: Written
3 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
SunWave vs RhymeSmokeRhymeSmoke is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Style: Written
4 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
ContagiousZ vs Blunt Rapper
Style: Freestyle
5 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
SunWave vs JbFromthe90s
Style: Written
4 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
ContagiousZ vs JbFromthe90s
Style: Written
5 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars

[ more battles... ]
 
LetsBeef Discord Battle League presents: CORONATION Listen on SoundCloud
 

Go Back   Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums > Battle Arena > General Talk
Reload this Page Should the LBT/LBA Be Decided By No Shows?
Register Articles FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

View Poll Results: Should the Title Switch Hands Based on No Shows?
Yes 4 80.00%
No 1 20.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display
  #1  
Unread 12-19-2017, 09:07 AM
Nicholas
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default Should the LBT/LBA Be Decided By No Shows?
I feel the sentiments are that in the event of a no-show by the title holder the contender should battle the No. 1 contender on the next card to decide a new champion. However I want to run a poll to ensure I'm not off base with this.
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2017, 09:07 AM   #1
 
Nicholas
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default Should the LBT/LBA Be Decided By No Shows?
I feel the sentiments are that in the event of a no-show by the title holder the contender should battle the No. 1 contender on the next card to decide a new champion. However I want to run a poll to ensure I'm not off base with this.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread 12-19-2017, 02:30 PM
OSKAR
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,188
Mentioned: 1070 Post(s)
Tagged: 31 Thread(s)
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
23 Won / 7 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 5 Lost
Default
Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2017, 02:30 PM   #2
 
OSKAR
Estimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Audio: 7.34/10 stars
Ranked Audio Record
23 Won / 7 Lost
Estimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 7.34/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 starsEstimated Skill in Text: 6.89/10 stars
Ranked Text Record
4 Won / 5 Lost
 
Join Date: May 2010
Voted: 108 audio / 116 text
Posts: 2,188
Mentioned: 1070 Post(s)
Tagged: 31 Thread(s)
Default
Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .
Offline  
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread 12-19-2017, 02:34 PM
Nicholas
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by OSKAR View Post
Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .
Glad I polled this.
Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2017, 02:34 PM   #3
 
Nicholas
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by OSKAR View Post
Yes!The challenger held his end of the bargain so he deserves it. He will defend it against the no 1 contender in the following card so I don't see why vacating it till then. Bare in mind, asking the no.1 contender to earn that contendership and then battle again for the championship (with little amount to prepare whereas the one who won by no show might recycle bars) is unfair .
Glad I polled this.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display
Hybrid Mode Hybrid Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 PM.

Contact Admin - Lets Beef - Archive - Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Top

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

 

[ LetsBeef Instagram | LetsBeef Facebook | LetsBeef Twitter | LetsBeef Youtube | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FAQ | Contact Support ]
Some members of the public may use explicit lyrics in the performance of their art, so please be advised that such language, if any, may not be appropriate for minors.
Graphics by Pixel Dreams · Site © 2025 LetsBeef.com
 
(new)
no new posts