|
View Poll Results: Should it be against the rules to comment on an unopened battle?
|
Yes.
|
  
|
7 |
50.00% |
No.
|
  
|
7 |
50.00% |
Undecided.
|
  
|
0 |
0% |

02-08-2014, 06:37 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Poll: Should it be against the rules?
Should it be against the rules for members not involved in a battle, to comment on a pending battle that is not currently open?
|
02-08-2014, 06:37 PM
|
#1
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Poll: Should it be against the rules?
Should it be against the rules for members not involved in a battle, to comment on a pending battle that is not currently open?
|
|
|

02-08-2014, 06:40 PM
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,812
Mentioned: 1139 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 311 Won / 86 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 6 Won / 2 Lost
|
It all depends on whats said..
|
02-08-2014, 06:40 PM
|
#2
|
Ranked Text Record 311 Won / 86 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 6 Won / 2 Lost
Join Date: Jul 2011
Voted:
90
audio / 1323
text
Posts: 2,812
Mentioned: 1139 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
|
It all depends on whats said..
|
Offline
|
|

02-08-2014, 06:40 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phenomonon
It all depends on whats said..
|
Even if the battle is not currently open for votes?
|
02-08-2014, 06:40 PM
|
#3
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phenomonon
It all depends on whats said..
|
Even if the battle is not currently open for votes?
|
|
|

02-08-2014, 06:46 PM
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,812
Mentioned: 1139 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 311 Won / 86 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 6 Won / 2 Lost
|
Yeah..
|
02-08-2014, 06:46 PM
|
#4
|
Ranked Text Record 311 Won / 86 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 6 Won / 2 Lost
Join Date: Jul 2011
Voted:
90
audio / 1323
text
Posts: 2,812
Mentioned: 1139 Post(s)
Tagged: 56 Thread(s)
|
Yeah..
|
Offline
|
|

02-08-2014, 08:43 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Seems pretty even so far. Could you guys give your reasons for why you voted the way you have?
|
02-08-2014, 08:43 PM
|
#5
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Seems pretty even so far. Could you guys give your reasons for why you voted the way you have?
|
|
|

02-08-2014, 08:44 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,507
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 20 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 8 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 66 Won / 14 Lost
|
If u have to leave an expo it stops people from seeing it at the top and depending on the comment it can sway.
|
02-08-2014, 08:44 PM
|
#6
|
Ranked Audio Record 8 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 66 Won / 14 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2011
Voted:
0 audio / 249
text
Posts: 1,507
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 20 Thread(s)
|
If u have to leave an expo it stops people from seeing it at the top and depending on the comment it can sway.
|
Offline
|
|

02-08-2014, 08:53 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
^So you think Expo's should be illegal, or just before the battle opens? That seems silly. Some shit would be missed. In live battles it is common fpr a battler to repeat a bar and emphasize the WP's or things that might miss the head on the first listen. If I need an expo, I put it as soon as I post the battle because A) its fresh in my mind, and B) I might not be around when the battle is accepted and I dont want something I wrote to go over a head just because they aren't slowing down and really looking for a WP.
Other than that, I just don't see the point in banning comments pre-rebuttled battle. A sway is a sway either way and is already against the rules. Any thing that isn't swaying isn't doing much harm, so why get your panties ruffled over it?
|
02-08-2014, 08:53 PM
|
#7
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
^So you think Expo's should be illegal, or just before the battle opens? That seems silly. Some shit would be missed. In live battles it is common fpr a battler to repeat a bar and emphasize the WP's or things that might miss the head on the first listen. If I need an expo, I put it as soon as I post the battle because A) its fresh in my mind, and B) I might not be around when the battle is accepted and I dont want something I wrote to go over a head just because they aren't slowing down and really looking for a WP.
Other than that, I just don't see the point in banning comments pre-rebuttled battle. A sway is a sway either way and is already against the rules. Any thing that isn't swaying isn't doing much harm, so why get your panties ruffled over it?
|
|
|

02-08-2014, 10:29 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agonize
^So you think Expo's should be illegal, or just before the battle opens? That seems silly. Some shit would be missed. In live battles it is common fpr a battler to repeat a bar and emphasize the WP's or things that might miss the head on the first listen. If I need an expo, I put it as soon as I post the battle because A) its fresh in my mind, and B) I might not be around when the battle is accepted and I dont want something I wrote to go over a head just because they aren't slowing down and really looking for a WP.
Other than that, I just don't see the point in banning comments pre-rebuttled battle. A sway is a sway either way and is already against the rules. Any thing that isn't swaying isn't doing much harm, so why get your panties ruffled over it?
|
@ Agonize, this is about members OTHER THAN THE BATTLERS posting on a battle before the battle is open for votes. IE: Crew members, and people linked to the battle prematurely.
|
02-08-2014, 10:29 PM
|
#8
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agonize
^So you think Expo's should be illegal, or just before the battle opens? That seems silly. Some shit would be missed. In live battles it is common fpr a battler to repeat a bar and emphasize the WP's or things that might miss the head on the first listen. If I need an expo, I put it as soon as I post the battle because A) its fresh in my mind, and B) I might not be around when the battle is accepted and I dont want something I wrote to go over a head just because they aren't slowing down and really looking for a WP.
Other than that, I just don't see the point in banning comments pre-rebuttled battle. A sway is a sway either way and is already against the rules. Any thing that isn't swaying isn't doing much harm, so why get your panties ruffled over it?
|
@ Agonize, this is about members OTHER THAN THE BATTLERS posting on a battle before the battle is open for votes. IE: Crew members, and people linked to the battle prematurely.
|
|
|

02-08-2014, 09:03 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,507
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 20 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 8 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 66 Won / 14 Lost
|
No smh @ Agonize I'm saying if u have to expo the voters probably won't see it if there's fifty comments on it. What's wrong with waiting till after? Nothing.
---------- Post added at 01:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:02 AM ----------
See what happens when people don't read? But ok if ur up against daddio and fifty people coment on it like oh shit daddios about to kill this nigga. It's gonna affect ur percentage.
|
02-08-2014, 09:03 PM
|
#9
|
Ranked Audio Record 8 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 66 Won / 14 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2011
Voted:
0 audio / 249
text
Posts: 1,507
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 20 Thread(s)
|
No smh @ Agonize I'm saying if u have to expo the voters probably won't see it if there's fifty comments on it. What's wrong with waiting till after? Nothing.
---------- Post added at 01:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:02 AM ----------
See what happens when people don't read? But ok if ur up against daddio and fifty people coment on it like oh shit daddios about to kill this nigga. It's gonna affect ur percentage.
|
Offline
|
|

02-08-2014, 09:05 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Ok, I see a point there. I also don't see this as a huge problem. I have never seen a battle with only one participant posted that had more than 1-3(tops) comments by people not involved. Making it against the rules seems silly.
If you wanted to make it impossible for people to comment, I could see merit in that. But to make it against the rules and issue infractions for it, no way.
|
02-08-2014, 09:05 PM
|
#10
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Ok, I see a point there. I also don't see this as a huge problem. I have never seen a battle with only one participant posted that had more than 1-3(tops) comments by people not involved. Making it against the rules seems silly.
If you wanted to make it impossible for people to comment, I could see merit in that. But to make it against the rules and issue infractions for it, no way.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.
|
|
|