Battle Rap and Freestyle Battles at Lets Beef


 
Start a battle

Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!
 
  Scheme Championships May 2025
 
 
Battle Feed
Ohs vs GodTheReptilian
Style: Written Blind Drop
7 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
Slogo16z vs ahSHHitahSHHit is on FIRE! 5+ wins in a row!
Style: Written Blind Drop
3 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars

[ more battles... ]
 
 

Go Back   Lets Beef - Battle Rap Forums > Battle Arena > Text Arena
Register Articles FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search Journals

Notices

User Tag List

 
 
Thread Tools Display
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Unread 01-27-2017, 07:48 AM
Rant
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default Restructuring the Moderator voting criteria?

There's been a persistent problem in the structure of the way in which we expect moderators to vote on battles.(Not in how they vote, or who they vote for. But, in what battles they're voting on.)

Battles sometimes remain open days after they're scheduled to end because of a lack of votes. And this has been a continual problem for a considerable period of time. A method previously used to mend this problem was the fair voter's club, but, this is a flawed system, as this type of issue is exactly what moderators are for, in conjunction with their technical duties.

Because of this, we should restructure the way in which we expect moderators to vote. By placing their predominant focus on battles both on the closing soon list, and the recent battles list(that aren't hotlisted.), assuring that these battles all get the minimum required number of votes to be closed.


What do you guys think?

---------- Post added at 07:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 AM ----------

Additionally, perhaps using a voting quota per month for moderators is an additional step to aiding this issue.
Reply With Quote
Unread 01-27-2017, 07:48 AM   #1
 
Rant
Guest
 
Voted: 0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default Restructuring the Moderator voting criteria?

There's been a persistent problem in the structure of the way in which we expect moderators to vote on battles.(Not in how they vote, or who they vote for. But, in what battles they're voting on.)

Battles sometimes remain open days after they're scheduled to end because of a lack of votes. And this has been a continual problem for a considerable period of time. A method previously used to mend this problem was the fair voter's club, but, this is a flawed system, as this type of issue is exactly what moderators are for, in conjunction with their technical duties.

Because of this, we should restructure the way in which we expect moderators to vote. By placing their predominant focus on battles both on the closing soon list, and the recent battles list(that aren't hotlisted.), assuring that these battles all get the minimum required number of votes to be closed.


What do you guys think?

---------- Post added at 07:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 AM ----------

Additionally, perhaps using a voting quota per month for moderators is an additional step to aiding this issue.
 
Reply With Quote
 

Tags
pulse > credits, pulse > fair votes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

 

[ LetsBeef Instagram | LetsBeef Facebook | LetsBeef Twitter | LetsBeef Youtube | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FAQ | Contact Support ]
Some members of the public may use explicit lyrics in the performance of their art, so please be advised that such language, if any, may not be appropriate for minors.
Graphics by Pixel Dreams · Site © 2025 LetsBeef.com
 
no new posts