Restructuring the Moderator voting criteria?
There's been a persistent problem in the structure of the way in which we expect moderators to vote on battles.(Not in how they vote, or who they vote for. But, in what battles they're voting on.)
Battles sometimes remain open days after they're scheduled to end because of a lack of votes. And this has been a continual problem for a considerable period of time. A method previously used to mend this problem was the fair voter's club, but, this is a flawed system, as this type of issue is exactly what moderators are for, in conjunction with their technical duties.
Because of this, we should restructure the way in which we expect moderators to vote. By placing their predominant focus on battles both on the closing soon list, and the recent battles list(that aren't hotlisted.), assuring that these battles all get the minimum required number of votes to be closed.
What do you guys think?
---------- Post added at 07:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 AM ----------
Additionally, perhaps using a voting quota per month for moderators is an additional step to aiding this issue.
|