Start a battle

Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!
 
  Scheme Tournament 2025
 
 
Battle Feed
IcyHot vs Crashout
16 Lines (8 Bars)
1 Vote 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
IcyHot vs Blue Hulk
32 Lines (16 Bars)
0 Votes No Rating YetNo Rating YetNo Rating YetNo Rating YetNo Rating Yet
IcyHot vs Blue Hulk
32 Lines (16 Bars)
1 Vote 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
targrover vs Mickey macxx
8 Lines (4 Bars)
2 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
DEADSm1Le vs LethalKiller
8 Lines (4 Bars) Blind Drop
7 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars
zacharybridg... vs Crashout
8 Lines (4 Bars)
5 Votes 4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars4.75 stars

[ more battles... ]
 
 

Tag Team Tournament #6
Length: 16 Lines

OSKAR (8%) Lost
Ranked #-- This Month (#499 All Time)
7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars7.34/10 stars
Reppin: London, England, United Kingdom
Phracture (92%) Won
Ranked #-- This Month (#256 All Time)
9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars9.65/10 stars
Reppin: Brooklyn, New York, United States



OSKAR

Loading...


Phracture
Loading...


 
 

Voting has ended for this battle (battle finished on 2015-01-11 23:41:32).

Comment:
Loading...
 

 
 


Nice battle here. Some parts where iffy on both sides (wp). Other than that, ya'll done your thing. Feel one teams punches where better constructed together and landed smoother/greater impact than their opponents. The fairs in, gents. Good luck. Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-11 19:22:41 Private Message Óðinn



 

 
 

Personals: Oskar has 0 text wins & is dead weight. Rule turns down battles, clinging on to his past. Recent posts: "If i WERE to battle, that COULD be fresh Bleu , Rupt & illo i WOULD make exceptions for yall". He said he retired & is too busy but has hella posts,threads,&snipe d battles. He's not the old rule he's an old rule. 1/ Posted on: 2015-01-11 18:48:06 Private Message MAN DOWN


Without swaying too much, I felt both teams had good punches/concepts, but were really lacking in basics, and both had some slants/wording issues, which lowered the readability factor of the verse. However, I felt one team was slightly better in every category, and left me feeling more entertained, by a significant margin. Fair's in. Low 7 - Mid 6. Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-11 18:49:52 Private Message Shodan


B U R D E N
<TBS>
The Raw Talent

Tha winners were more consistent in all areas.. imo. Both had wording / wp issues that took away from impact, but one more than tha other. My vote goes to tha overall cleaner, stronger verse. Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-11 20:20:52 Private Message B U R D E N


ELOH STACKz
<SLK>
Live Battler

Nice spar gentleman. I thought I'd see a few more knockout blows, but both were good reads. I felt one team was the bigger puncher & had a consistent angle while attacking their opponents.... Mid/Low - Respect Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-11 21:02:34 Private Message ELOH STACKz


overall both verses were dope .. it came down to consistency for me.. if i had to critique anything some of the wordplay was kinda iffy Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-12 14:27:31 Private Message reEFer


Agree with Lock on this. The loser's wordplay and multis were really forced in a lot of the areas. I felt like there was too many attempts at nameplays which made the read a little repetitive at times. Not saying some of the wps weren't executed nicely, it's just like reading the same page over and over. The winners had some multi issues also here and there, same with the wordplay being forced. I also liked a lot of their concepts though, which sometimes were carried out to their full potential, sometimes not so much. The winner here was just more consistent with less forced angles in their box. Whoever wins will need to step it up next round and focus on readability a tad more rather than trying to carry out their ideas without concern for that risk. Good battle to both though, youse did your thing. The fair's in. Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-12 14:41:55 Private Message Obey


Not giving anything away. One team was just clearer in their punches which resulted in them landing more. Both had cringe-worthy wp usage, lackluster closers and overall played concepts. Decent bout. Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-12 14:49:23 Private Message SAND


PurFekShun

Basic Member

A lotto forced shit here Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-12 19:12:26 Private Message PurFekShun


Quite disappointing here to me, actually. I felt like the losers here came VERY intensely basic with their wordplay and rhyme schemes, to the point that half of the beginning scheme was skewed & forced into play just to make their concepts work. I REALLLLY can't say this enough, if none of your rhymes to set up your punch barely push the slant category then the impact of that punch will be drastically hindered. It's kind of like fist fighting with broken fingers there. My losers here came with borderline horrible wordplay that was super stretched in quite a lot of places. I think that what really hurt them is their stretched setups and lackluster rhyme-ability. Now, onto my winners. They themselves had some borderline laughably basic wordplay, but seemed to have more of a grasp on execution and fluidity, which ultimately gave them the W here. When it comes to creativity and structuring this is pretty much even, but that small edge was given to my winners here because of that smoother fluidity and more impactful execution. No hate intended, I'm just an offensive voter :) Voted: Yes (Hidden)
Posted on: 2015-01-13 03:36:40 Private Message Babylon

 

 

[ LetsBeef Instagram | LetsBeef Facebook | LetsBeef Twitter | LetsBeef Youtube | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | FAQ | Contact Support ]
Some members of the public may use explicit lyrics in the performance of their art, so please be advised that such language, if any, may not be appropriate for minors.
Graphics by Pixel Dreams · Site © 2025 LetsBeef.com
 
(new)