Why I'm Not a Mod... - Page 3 - Lets Beef

**V3numb** · #21 11-18-2013, 04:03 AM

he was a moderator.. twice..

**V3numb** · 11-18-2013, 04:03 AM

he was a moderator.. twice..

#22 11-18-2013, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

A) Post the "Hate" comment. Do not paraphrase either.

B) You weren't exposing anything since what you were supposedly "exposing" was already out in the open to begin with (My "hate" comment on a track which everyone could see, until you deleted it, censoring me, like you complain here in this thread that we censored you) "bullshit double standards" - Hypocritical Eth.

You Jumped the gun and called me out/insinuated I'm corrupted in public, all off the back of me telling another member.

A) I don't like his NEW name.

B) He should GO BACK to his old name which he earned his reputation on because his NEW name makes him practically anonymous, which was a fully justified observation based on the lack of plays and comments on his diss track (Historically the most popular tracks here)

C) I voted against him in a tournament battle which he later went on to lose by a large majority vote, in a tournament round which I voted on all but 1 battle.

......

This isn't about censoring you. This is about you making an ass of yourself, myself and everyone else on the staff in public as a result of you jumping the gun and making a rookie mistake, by calling/insinuating another member of staff is corrupt in public when there was nothing to question in the first place.

You got pulled over to 1 side about it, didn't like it, did your usual stubborn "I'm right, everyone else is wrong, I'm Eth and if I don't get it, it can't possibly be right" thing you do all too often, I warned you that your extremely arrogant, ignorant and tedious stubbornness will be your un doing, You continued your inane and completely besides the point irrelevant rebuttles in the pursuit of getting the 1 up you always seem to crave no matter how wrong you are.

And now look what's happened.

You say you only care for the site. Yet you sacrificed a spot which put you in a much better position to take care of it out of pure

Stubborness.
Shortsightedness.
Arrogance

And above all else, SELFISHNESS.

Certain disgruntled members with an agenda will loom up to you with a raised clenched fist like you stuck it to the man. But all you've really done is screw them over out of selfishness and some desire to be seen as a martyr to the masses.

You're not interested in what's best for the site. And you're certainly not righteous. You're an arrogant jumped up self obsessed narcissist more concerned with how people see you. Ironic, I know.

You're in the wrong. No matter how much you try to convince yourself otherwise, No matter how much a minority with a voice from the outside looking in say you aren't and that you were wronged.

Plain. Simple. Flat out. Wrong

But enjoy that Micky Mouse, half assed crusade for "whats right" as you CUT ALL TIES from the "corrupt establishment", Topical Moderator.

.... Well that lasted long.

inb4 troll/inane argument response. Enjoy your last word.

A) I can't, it was deleted.

B) RelentlessMC deleted it, not me. He deleted it because he didnt want you commenting on his stuff. He requested that you dont do it again, but he can't block you as you are a mod. You went against his wishes, in turn abusing your powers, and commented once again.

A (Why is there another A?)) You disliking his name isn't really relevant is it?

B) Why couldnt you have settled this in the appropriate places, such as his profile of private comments? Instead of hate commenting his track?

C) As I said before, it's, pardon the pun, unethical to vote on a guy you admittedly hate's battle, especially the day after you hate comment his track. I never once disagreed with how you voted. I also never warned you about this as it's not against the rules.

Members of the staff are corrupt. Should we hide the fact that the only reason Grizz never got banned was that 2 of his crew members, as well as his "mentor", vouched for him? Had it been a dude like MaCc, there is NO chance that would have happened. You can't allow people to break the rules just because they are popular. We need to deal with every issue in the same way, which is why I dealt with your rule breaking like I would anyone else.

Or how about the fact that RULE got Dissizit his mod spot, and both before and since being a mod, Diss has done NOTHING.

My "much better position" only meant that if someone calls me out, their thread gets deleted. Two people got warned for stepping to me. I am able to do everything I did as a mod now. If someone's voting bad, I'll pass it on to a mod. If a battle needs corrected, I'll pass it on to a mod. Let's not pretend that 90% of the mods actually do anything anyways. ILLoKWENT and NOBLE were the only guys actively doing stuff. Swag used to. Jason is helpful, but not on his own initiative. Those 3 are the only guys worth anything as a mod (RULE too if you count LBT).

You guys don't want what's best for the site. You want what's best for the staff. Anyone breaking the rules should be exposed and dealt with. THAT'S what's best for the site.

11-18-2013, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C

A) Post the "Hate" comment. Do not paraphrase either.

B) You weren't exposing anything since what you were supposedly "exposing" was already out in the open to begin with (My "hate" comment on a track which everyone could see, until you deleted it, censoring me, like you complain here in this thread that we censored you) "bullshit double standards" - Hypocritical Eth.

You Jumped the gun and called me out/insinuated I'm corrupted in public, all off the back of me telling another member.

A) I don't like his NEW name.

B) He should GO BACK to his old name which he earned his reputation on because his NEW name makes him practically anonymous, which was a fully justified observation based on the lack of plays and comments on his diss track (Historically the most popular tracks here)

C) I voted against him in a tournament battle which he later went on to lose by a large majority vote, in a tournament round which I voted on all but 1 battle.

......

This isn't about censoring you. This is about you making an ass of yourself, myself and everyone else on the staff in public as a result of you jumping the gun and making a rookie mistake, by calling/insinuating another member of staff is corrupt in public when there was nothing to question in the first place.

You got pulled over to 1 side about it, didn't like it, did your usual stubborn "I'm right, everyone else is wrong, I'm Eth and if I don't get it, it can't possibly be right" thing you do all too often, I warned you that your extremely arrogant, ignorant and tedious stubbornness will be your un doing, You continued your inane and completely besides the point irrelevant rebuttles in the pursuit of getting the 1 up you always seem to crave no matter how wrong you are.

And now look what's happened.

You say you only care for the site. Yet you sacrificed a spot which put you in a much better position to take care of it out of pure

Stubborness.
Shortsightedness.
Arrogance

And above all else, SELFISHNESS.

Certain disgruntled members with an agenda will loom up to you with a raised clenched fist like you stuck it to the man. But all you've really done is screw them over out of selfishness and some desire to be seen as a martyr to the masses.

You're not interested in what's best for the site. And you're certainly not righteous. You're an arrogant jumped up self obsessed narcissist more concerned with how people see you. Ironic, I know.

You're in the wrong. No matter how much you try to convince yourself otherwise, No matter how much a minority with a voice from the outside looking in say you aren't and that you were wronged.

Plain. Simple. Flat out. Wrong

But enjoy that Micky Mouse, half assed crusade for "whats right" as you CUT ALL TIES from the "corrupt establishment", Topical Moderator.

.... Well that lasted long.

inb4 troll/inane argument response. Enjoy your last word.

A) I can't, it was deleted.

B) RelentlessMC deleted it, not me. He deleted it because he didnt want you commenting on his stuff. He requested that you dont do it again, but he can't block you as you are a mod. You went against his wishes, in turn abusing your powers, and commented once again.

A (Why is there another A?)) You disliking his name isn't really relevant is it?

B) Why couldnt you have settled this in the appropriate places, such as his profile of private comments? Instead of hate commenting his track?

C) As I said before, it's, pardon the pun, unethical to vote on a guy you admittedly hate's battle, especially the day after you hate comment his track. I never once disagreed with how you voted. I also never warned you about this as it's not against the rules.

Members of the staff are corrupt. Should we hide the fact that the only reason Grizz never got banned was that 2 of his crew members, as well as his "mentor", vouched for him? Had it been a dude like MaCc, there is NO chance that would have happened. You can't allow people to break the rules just because they are popular. We need to deal with every issue in the same way, which is why I dealt with your rule breaking like I would anyone else.

Or how about the fact that RULE got Dissizit his mod spot, and both before and since being a mod, Diss has done NOTHING.

My "much better position" only meant that if someone calls me out, their thread gets deleted. Two people got warned for stepping to me. I am able to do everything I did as a mod now. If someone's voting bad, I'll pass it on to a mod. If a battle needs corrected, I'll pass it on to a mod. Let's not pretend that 90% of the mods actually do anything anyways. ILLoKWENT and NOBLE were the only guys actively doing stuff. Swag used to. Jason is helpful, but not on his own initiative. Those 3 are the only guys worth anything as a mod (RULE too if you count LBT).

You guys don't want what's best for the site. You want what's best for the staff. Anyone breaking the rules should be exposed and dealt with. THAT'S what's best for the site.