I'm sorry.

[Joe MuGGz]

I understand.. So what do you suggest? Maybe a limit on members in a crew...for now until activity picks up?

@Lockhart

[Joe MuGGz]

I understand.. So what do you suggest? Maybe a limit on members in a crew...for now until activity picks up?

@Lockhart

Originally Posted by M U G G Z

I understand.. So what do you suggest? Maybe a limit on members in a crew...for now until activity picks up?

@Lockhart

Nooooo...... I'm not feeling that. Shits simple, everyone ups their own voting activity = problem solved. Make your threads, vote on battles etc. etc. Limiting crews isn't the answer.

Originally Posted by M U G G Z

I understand.. So what do you suggest? Maybe a limit on members in a crew...for now until activity picks up?

@Lockhart

Nooooo...... I'm not feeling that. Shits simple, everyone ups their own voting activity = problem solved. Make your threads, vote on battles etc. etc. Limiting crews isn't the answer.

@Nicholas I say what we need to do is put a cap on number of crew members for a limited time only, teach these younger guys what to look for and how to vote (they'll also learn more about battling in the process) and after that time is up, the crews don't have to cap anymore. As it stands, though, there are too many tournaments where the sane crew members are participating, which equals slept on battles and no voting.

@Nicholas I say what we need to do is put a cap on number of crew members for a limited time only, teach these younger guys what to look for and how to vote (they'll also learn more about battling in the process) and after that time is up, the crews don't have to cap anymore. As it stands, though, there are too many tournaments where the sane crew members are participating, which equals slept on battles and no voting.

Originally Posted by Lockhart

@Nicholas I say what we need to do is put a cap on number of crew members for a limited time only, teach these younger guys what to look for and how to vote (they'll also learn more about battling in the process) and after that time is up, the crews don't have to cap anymore. As it stands, though, there are too many tournaments where the sane crew members are participating, which equals slept on battles and no voting.

The voting on battles with Murda is bad, granted. But jesus this isn't the biggest disaster in the world, your proposition means crews like Bakers, Murda and AC's are going to have to destroy their own shit for the sake of a couple of votes on a few slept on battles and your plan not even work, it's just a proposition. I think it's easy for you to say it when you're a member of LOD which doesn't have a large number of members. We've taken months building our crews, personally Bakers is like a family to me I talk to a lot of you guys via IM so to have to pick favourites and kick people because you want a few more votes on your battles is just madness.

Originally Posted by Lockhart

@Nicholas I say what we need to do is put a cap on number of crew members for a limited time only, teach these younger guys what to look for and how to vote (they'll also learn more about battling in the process) and after that time is up, the crews don't have to cap anymore. As it stands, though, there are too many tournaments where the sane crew members are participating, which equals slept on battles and no voting.

The voting on battles with Murda is bad, granted. But jesus this isn't the biggest disaster in the world, your proposition means crews like Bakers, Murda and AC's are going to have to destroy their own shit for the sake of a couple of votes on a few slept on battles and your plan not even work, it's just a proposition. I think it's easy for you to say it when you're a member of LOD which doesn't have a large number of members. We've taken months building our crews, personally Bakers is like a family to me I talk to a lot of you guys via IM so to have to pick favourites and kick people because you want a few more votes on your battles is just madness.

Originally Posted by Nicholas

The voting on battles with Murda is bad, granted. But jesus this isn't the biggest disaster in the world, your proposition means crews like Bakers, Murda and AC's are going to have to destroy their own shit for the sake of a couple of votes on a few slept on battles and your plan not even work, it's just a proosition. I think it's easy for you to say it when you're a member of LOD which doesn't have a large number of members. We've taken months building our crews, personally Bakers is like a family to me I talk to a lot of you guys via IM so to have to pick favourites and kick people because you want a few more votes on your battles is just madness.

I'm not saying kick anyone you currently have because that's unfair anf wrong to ask, but putting a cap on who you recruit just might help the situation a little bit. What I'm starting to find ridiculous is some of the double crews like AC's/Chloro and MM/Dojo. Chloro doesn't really exist, anymore, and I don't see many Dojo guys elevating, to be perfectly honest. So the point I'm trying to make with that is : if you're not elevating the younger guys, then you're pretty much diluting the voting pool with the double crews.

Originally Posted by Nicholas

The voting on battles with Murda is bad, granted. But jesus this isn't the biggest disaster in the world, your proposition means crews like Bakers, Murda and AC's are going to have to destroy their own shit for the sake of a couple of votes on a few slept on battles and your plan not even work, it's just a proosition. I think it's easy for you to say it when you're a member of LOD which doesn't have a large number of members. We've taken months building our crews, personally Bakers is like a family to me I talk to a lot of you guys via IM so to have to pick favourites and kick people because you want a few more votes on your battles is just madness.

I'm not saying kick anyone you currently have because that's unfair anf wrong to ask, but putting a cap on who you recruit just might help the situation a little bit. What I'm starting to find ridiculous is some of the double crews like AC's/Chloro and MM/Dojo. Chloro doesn't really exist, anymore, and I don't see many Dojo guys elevating, to be perfectly honest. So the point I'm trying to make with that is : if you're not elevating the younger guys, then you're pretty much diluting the voting pool with the double crews.

Originally Posted by Lockhart

I'm not saying kick anyone you currently have because that's unfair anf wrong to ask, but putting a cap on who you recruit just might help the situation a little bit. What I'm starting to find ridiculous is some of the double crews like AC's/Chloro and MM/Dojo. Chloro doesn't really exist, anymore, and I don't see many Dojo guys elevating, to be perfectly honest. So the point I'm trying to make with that is : if you're not elevating the younger guys, then you're pretty much diluting the voting pool with the double crews.

I can understand the argument on double crews. That proposition is more reasonable but IDK. Lets try to up the voting activity first, why not come up with ideas to do that? More rewards for voting.

Originally Posted by Lockhart

I'm not saying kick anyone you currently have because that's unfair anf wrong to ask, but putting a cap on who you recruit just might help the situation a little bit. What I'm starting to find ridiculous is some of the double crews like AC's/Chloro and MM/Dojo. Chloro doesn't really exist, anymore, and I don't see many Dojo guys elevating, to be perfectly honest. So the point I'm trying to make with that is : if you're not elevating the younger guys, then you're pretty much diluting the voting pool with the double crews.

I can understand the argument on double crews. That proposition is more reasonable but IDK. Lets try to up the voting activity first, why not come up with ideas to do that? More rewards for voting.

@Nicholas Isn't @Pugz trying to work on something for that?

@Nicholas Isn't @Pugz trying to work on something for that?

Originally Posted by Lockhart

@Nicholas Isn't @Pugz trying to work on something for that?

IDK hopefully...

Originally Posted by Lockhart

@Nicholas Isn't @Pugz trying to work on something for that?

IDK hopefully...

[Joe MuGGz]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

The voting on battles with Murda is bad, granted. But jesus this isn't the biggest disaster in the world, your proposition means crews like Bakers, Murda and AC's are going to have to destroy their own shit for the sake of a couple of votes on a few slept on battles and your plan not even work, it's just a proposition. I think it's easy for you to say it when you're a member of LOD which doesn't have a large number of members. We've taken months building our crews, personally Bakers is like a family to me I talk to a lot of you guys via IM so to have to pick favourites and kick people because you want a few more votes on your battles is just madness.

Thats tru..

---------- Post added at 08:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:19 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I can understand the argument on double crews. That proposition is more reasonable but IDK. Lets try to up the voting activity first, why not come up with ideas to do that? More rewards for voting.

great idea.. up the rewards for voting..

OR lower the amount of credits u get when u vote to generate more votes, right?

[Joe MuGGz]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

The voting on battles with Murda is bad, granted. But jesus this isn't the biggest disaster in the world, your proposition means crews like Bakers, Murda and AC's are going to have to destroy their own shit for the sake of a couple of votes on a few slept on battles and your plan not even work, it's just a proposition. I think it's easy for you to say it when you're a member of LOD which doesn't have a large number of members. We've taken months building our crews, personally Bakers is like a family to me I talk to a lot of you guys via IM so to have to pick favourites and kick people because you want a few more votes on your battles is just madness.

Thats tru..

---------- Post added at 08:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:19 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I can understand the argument on double crews. That proposition is more reasonable but IDK. Lets try to up the voting activity first, why not come up with ideas to do that? More rewards for voting.

great idea.. up the rewards for voting..

OR lower the amount of credits u get when u vote to generate more votes, right?

We'll see @Nicholas but still. After the Chloro project (which was good while it lasted) and Dojo not showing much of any improvement, the secondary crew thing needs to stop. People should just make their own crews and have the D.I.Y mentality. It would definitely help out with voting and crew activity. I know I may be sounding hypocritical here, considering I'm a member of an already established crew and I get that, but I am not in the position to lead a crew yet. I still have a lot to learn, whereas others can and should lead their own crews and do it their own way.

We'll see @Nicholas but still. After the Chloro project (which was good while it lasted) and Dojo not showing much of any improvement, the secondary crew thing needs to stop. People should just make their own crews and have the D.I.Y mentality. It would definitely help out with voting and crew activity. I know I may be sounding hypocritical here, considering I'm a member of an already established crew and I get that, but I am not in the position to lead a crew yet. I still have a lot to learn, whereas others can and should lead their own crews and do it their own way.