Yo Admin / mods

Originally Posted by IV

Okay Eth, I mean shown a link with my full name, like the google image search you pasted.

As I said though I thought your second name was posted around before. I wouldn't have posted it had I thought it was a covert thing, which is why I deleted the images when NOBLE asked me.

Originally Posted by IV

Okay Eth, I mean shown a link with my full name, like the google image search you pasted.

As I said though I thought your second name was posted around before. I wouldn't have posted it had I thought it was a covert thing, which is why I deleted the images when NOBLE asked me.

[IV]

Just C, I have BLOCKED Eth from my Facebook page, he can't find it because my privacy setting have chosen to block him, so it's not public to him (the subject)

[IV]

Just C, I have BLOCKED Eth from my Facebook page, he can't find it because my privacy setting have chosen to block him, so it's not public to him (the subject)

[Student]

Originally Posted by Just C

Your not understanding me. Your name is in the link. It's advertised in a link which is public information.

And besides. You've used half of the name for years on here. Thats advertised. Like I said all someone ahs to do is type in Verity in a FB search and they'd find you in 5 minutes. You made that info accessable by using half of your real name as an L.B alias for 6 years.

In A Link For A Website She Didn't Advertise On Here Or On Her Twitter (Which She Does Advertise Here) Moot Point.
Again, NOBLE Or Jason Or Nicholas Could All Be Found (Jason I Don't Know Actually) But Does It Make It Right? No.

Originally Posted by EtH

I do say that I wouldn't have said Verity's full name had I known it was a covert enough thing. I thought it was very well known, and have showed quite a few people my verse for our battle and inadvertently showed them your full name. If it has NEVER been posted on LB before, in that respect then yes, I did break the rules (that I don't agree with, but regardless).

You Just Said You'd Do It Again Cause It Was Funny As Fuck, Why You Back-peddling Eth? Is It Now Sinking In?

[Student]

Originally Posted by Just C

Your not understanding me. Your name is in the link. It's advertised in a link which is public information.

And besides. You've used half of the name for years on here. Thats advertised. Like I said all someone ahs to do is type in Verity in a FB search and they'd find you in 5 minutes. You made that info accessable by using half of your real name as an L.B alias for 6 years.

In A Link For A Website She Didn't Advertise On Here Or On Her Twitter (Which She Does Advertise Here) Moot Point.
Again, NOBLE Or Jason Or Nicholas Could All Be Found (Jason I Don't Know Actually) But Does It Make It Right? No.

Originally Posted by EtH

I do say that I wouldn't have said Verity's full name had I known it was a covert enough thing. I thought it was very well known, and have showed quite a few people my verse for our battle and inadvertently showed them your full name. If it has NEVER been posted on LB before, in that respect then yes, I did break the rules (that I don't agree with, but regardless).

You Just Said You'd Do It Again Cause It Was Funny As Fuck, Why You Back-peddling Eth? Is It Now Sinking In?

[IV]

But Just C I understand that but you can't use the rarity of my name against me lol. I could go and post everybody's Facebook's because they're public and it be ok

[IV]

But Just C I understand that but you can't use the rarity of my name against me lol. I could go and post everybody's Facebook's because they're public and it be ok

[Student]

Originally Posted by Just C

Legally? yes, unless it is copywritten material. Facebook is a public access website. There's a reason they have privacy options. Because if you use them you're safe from this kind of thing, if you don't use them then oh well tough shit.

As far as the L.B rule on this I don't know. If everything he got is accessible through a simple search then I think he's fine, because I'm sure it's only private information gained via a hack or duping a friend request to a private profile.

How can her name be private information when it's pasted on the internet?

No hack of a private page was involved

I Know Rican's Last Name, I Know Mindless's Full Name, Shit I Know X's Full Name. Does Me Posting It On LetsBeef Make It Right Because One Of Them Didn't Have Their Profile Set To Private? NO. Everything He Got Was From A Google Search Using Her Last Name. Google Verity Right Now And I'll Bet Money You Won't Find Anything For 100+ Pages In.

[Student]

Originally Posted by Just C

Legally? yes, unless it is copywritten material. Facebook is a public access website. There's a reason they have privacy options. Because if you use them you're safe from this kind of thing, if you don't use them then oh well tough shit.

As far as the L.B rule on this I don't know. If everything he got is accessible through a simple search then I think he's fine, because I'm sure it's only private information gained via a hack or duping a friend request to a private profile.

How can her name be private information when it's pasted on the internet?

No hack of a private page was involved

I Know Rican's Last Name, I Know Mindless's Full Name, Shit I Know X's Full Name. Does Me Posting It On LetsBeef Make It Right Because One Of Them Didn't Have Their Profile Set To Private? NO. Everything He Got Was From A Google Search Using Her Last Name. Google Verity Right Now And I'll Bet Money You Won't Find Anything For 100+ Pages In.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Student

In A Link For A Website She Didn't Advertise On Here Or On Her Twitter (Which She Does Advertise Here) Moot Point.
Again, NOBLE Or Jason Or Nicholas Could All Be Found (Jason I Don't Know Actually) But Does It Make It Right? No.

WHO CARES? IT ISN'T PRIVATE, ENCRYPTED INFORMATION. THIS ISN'T THE DARK NET OR THE FBI DATABASE AND THE INFORMATION WASN'T OBTAINED VIA A HACK. ONCE YOUR SHIT IS OUT THERE IT'S PUBLIC PROPERTY UNLESS COPYWRITTEN AND THUS CEASES BEING IN A WAY SHAPE OR FORM ...PRIVATE. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE WORD PRIVACY MEANS?

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Student

In A Link For A Website She Didn't Advertise On Here Or On Her Twitter (Which She Does Advertise Here) Moot Point.
Again, NOBLE Or Jason Or Nicholas Could All Be Found (Jason I Don't Know Actually) But Does It Make It Right? No.

WHO CARES? IT ISN'T PRIVATE, ENCRYPTED INFORMATION. THIS ISN'T THE DARK NET OR THE FBI DATABASE AND THE INFORMATION WASN'T OBTAINED VIA A HACK. ONCE YOUR SHIT IS OUT THERE IT'S PUBLIC PROPERTY UNLESS COPYWRITTEN AND THUS CEASES BEING IN A WAY SHAPE OR FORM ...PRIVATE. DO YOU KNOW WHAT THE WORD PRIVACY MEANS?

[Student]

Originally Posted by Just C

But If I FB searched the name Jason I would have a billion results. You're cool but you're reaching extremely far.

Either Way It's Posting Personal Information Verity Choose Not To Disclose. If XplicitKontent Posts A Picture Of Himself That's Fine Because It His Doing. You Can't Post A Picture Of Someone Without Their Consent. It's Internet Privacy 101

[Student]

Originally Posted by Just C

But If I FB searched the name Jason I would have a billion results. You're cool but you're reaching extremely far.

Either Way It's Posting Personal Information Verity Choose Not To Disclose. If XplicitKontent Posts A Picture Of Himself That's Fine Because It His Doing. You Can't Post A Picture Of Someone Without Their Consent. It's Internet Privacy 101

@Student, I wouldn't go onto her FB and take images, because I'm sure she's got stuff with family members and shit, and I surprisingly toe the line at that stuff. I thought she'd revealed her second name here, which is why I said it. I'd still have no problem posting images that I'd found before. Mindless once posted his picture during an FG and LB pic battle. I'd have no moral dispute with using it here if it came up.

@IV, that's what I mean. Your Twitter picture, I have no problem with using whenever. The only thing I personally feel I shouldn't have done was post your second name. The rest? Your stupidity.

@Student, I wouldn't go onto her FB and take images, because I'm sure she's got stuff with family members and shit, and I surprisingly toe the line at that stuff. I thought she'd revealed her second name here, which is why I said it. I'd still have no problem posting images that I'd found before. Mindless once posted his picture during an FG and LB pic battle. I'd have no moral dispute with using it here if it came up.

@IV, that's what I mean. Your Twitter picture, I have no problem with using whenever. The only thing I personally feel I shouldn't have done was post your second name. The rest? Your stupidity.

CONVERSATION OVER...

Curtousy of an anonymous tipster...

*PROOF THAT I DID NOTHING WRONG*

CONVERSATION OVER...

Curtousy of an anonymous tipster...

*PROOF THAT I DID NOTHING WRONG*

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by EtH

CONVERSATION OVER...

Curtousy of an anonymous tipster...

*PROOF THAT I DID NOTHING WRONG*

Case closed, Good job Rule.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by EtH

CONVERSATION OVER...

Curtousy of an anonymous tipster...

*PROOF THAT I DID NOTHING WRONG*

Case closed, Good job Rule.