If you want to be considered for a Wild Card entry to the Text OR Audio GC...

[Seul]

Lmao, yo. Staff was removed because X said he spoke to his lawyer and he said we all needed contracts if we are considered "staff". Let's get that clear. If there was another reason, provide some proof before dragging our names through the mud. What a complete waste of our time and effort for you motherfuckers to suggest we weren't doing our jobs correctly.

[Seul]

Lmao, yo. Staff was removed because X said he spoke to his lawyer and he said we all needed contracts if we are considered "staff". Let's get that clear. If there was another reason, provide some proof before dragging our names through the mud. What a complete waste of our time and effort for you motherfuckers to suggest we weren't doing our jobs correctly.

Originally Posted by RULE

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers) got ALL staff removed. Something that has never happened in 10 years on LB.

this is not true. how many times do i have to say that X removed staff because of legal threats against the site. and who provoked that? pugz and rant. none of us had anything to do with that.

he said to all previous staff, this is nothing personal, i am only removing staff because i've been legally advised to do so.

Originally Posted by RULE

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers) got ALL staff removed. Something that has never happened in 10 years on LB.

this is not true. how many times do i have to say that X removed staff because of legal threats against the site. and who provoked that? pugz and rant. none of us had anything to do with that.

he said to all previous staff, this is nothing personal, i am only removing staff because i've been legally advised to do so.

[RULE]

Guess thats why you were re-modded then

[RULE]

Guess thats why you were re-modded then

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

Lmao, yo. Staff was removed because X said he spoke to his lawyer and he said we all needed contracts if we are considered "staff". Let's get that clear. If there was another reason, provide some proof before dragging our names through the mud. What a complete waste of our time and effort for you motherfuckers to suggest we weren't doing our jobs correctly.

Wanna show me where the fuck i said your name?

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

Lmao, yo. Staff was removed because X said he spoke to his lawyer and he said we all needed contracts if we are considered "staff". Let's get that clear. If there was another reason, provide some proof before dragging our names through the mud. What a complete waste of our time and effort for you motherfuckers to suggest we weren't doing our jobs correctly.

Wanna show me where the fuck i said your name?

[Seul]

Originally Posted by RULE

Wanna show me where the fuck i said your name?

Man you said staff as a whole, I was apart of that. I'm sure you can understand its infuriating when this seems to be the widespread consensus for a reason that is beyond me.

[Seul]

Originally Posted by RULE

Wanna show me where the fuck i said your name?

Man you said staff as a whole, I was apart of that. I'm sure you can understand its infuriating when this seems to be the widespread consensus for a reason that is beyond me.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

Man you said staff as a whole, I was apart of that. I'm sure you can understand its infuriating when this seems to be the widespread consensus for a reason that is beyond me.

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers)

^

This is word for word copy and pasted what i said.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

Man you said staff as a whole, I was apart of that. I'm sure you can understand its infuriating when this seems to be the widespread consensus for a reason that is beyond me.

The last group of mods actions (and i wasnt here so im not pointing fingers)

^

This is word for word copy and pasted what i said.

[Seul]

Originally Posted by RULE

^

This is word for word copy and pasted what i said.

Okay, I'm not here to argue with you. You can agree that, that may lead people to believe the reason the last group was dismissed was due to nefarious reasons.

---------- Post added at 12:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:35 PM ----------

I know how it feels to be on your end, and staff constantly being attacked. Just want this "last group of mods were corrupt" shit to be dropped.

[Seul]

Originally Posted by RULE

^

This is word for word copy and pasted what i said.

Okay, I'm not here to argue with you. You can agree that, that may lead people to believe the reason the last group was dismissed was due to nefarious reasons.

---------- Post added at 12:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:35 PM ----------

I know how it feels to be on your end, and staff constantly being attacked. Just want this "last group of mods were corrupt" shit to be dropped.

why don't you ask X? @RULE

the truth is, we were told one thing, so if it's another? we were lied to.

why don't you ask X? @RULE

the truth is, we were told one thing, so if it's another? we were lied to.

We didn't get removed for nefarious reasons. We got told by X individually that we had to be removed because of him trying to turn LB in to a legitimate business venture of sorts, and that we weren't under any kind of "contract" to be working as Moderators for his business, so we had to be removed.

We didn't get removed for nefarious reasons. We got told by X individually that we had to be removed because of him trying to turn LB in to a legitimate business venture of sorts, and that we weren't under any kind of "contract" to be working as Moderators for his business, so we had to be removed.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

Okay, I'm not here to argue with you. You can agree that, that may lead people to believe the reason the last group was dismissed was due to nefarious reasons.

I was told Guts was the sole reason.

And something with Lock and Boro but i dont understand that situation tbh.

I dont even know who the staff line up was then.


What i DO know is suggesting that im doing a shit job for wanting PROOF is insulting.

Cuz if you day its one of you accused of something you didnt do you will sure as shit want me being the one still running this.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Seul

Okay, I'm not here to argue with you. You can agree that, that may lead people to believe the reason the last group was dismissed was due to nefarious reasons.

I was told Guts was the sole reason.

And something with Lock and Boro but i dont understand that situation tbh.

I dont even know who the staff line up was then.


What i DO know is suggesting that im doing a shit job for wanting PROOF is insulting.

Cuz if you day its one of you accused of something you didnt do you will sure as shit want me being the one still running this.