Why hasn't RULE been banned already? - Page 3 - Lets Beef

**Louie Dawgs** · #21 05-10-2012, 07:33 PM

No, if he did that the percentages would change.

---------- Post added at 05:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------

If you can go back and the percentages now show taht he lost, you may have a point. I doubt it though.

**Louie Dawgs** · 05-10-2012, 07:33 PM

No, if he did that the percentages would change.

---------- Post added at 05:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:32 PM ----------

If you can go back and the percentages now show taht he lost, you may have a point. I doubt it though.

**Revan** · #22 05-10-2012, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

I see some hella fishy shit and I'm supposed to figure out that RULE's life is so non-existent outside of LB that he has to create aliases and "fake vote" for himself (if that's even what happened)... because his itch to get attention is that deprived? Fuck that.

Brainwashed groupies scared to raise a tone with Rule, lmmfao. Fuckin closet Net Nerd with forced gun bars. Way to go, Phroxen's Bitch.

Yeah.. old ass first and second battles off of multi accounts. That'd be my guess.

Your obsession with me is kinda cute. And im the one with no life lol.

You know how quick it is to load up chrome and post a comment? That 10 second didnt interfere with my life too much thanks for the concern tho.

& remarK was mod at the time and i ran by the comment idea by him so holla if you want it vouched for.

lmao stay stalking me tho, RULE's bitch. Even your homie knows you making yourself look mad dumb.

Grow up child.

**Revan** · 05-10-2012, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

I see some hella fishy shit and I'm supposed to figure out that RULE's life is so non-existent outside of LB that he has to create aliases and "fake vote" for himself (if that's even what happened)... because his itch to get attention is that deprived? Fuck that.

Brainwashed groupies scared to raise a tone with Rule, lmmfao. Fuckin closet Net Nerd with forced gun bars. Way to go, Phroxen's Bitch.

Yeah.. old ass first and second battles off of multi accounts. That'd be my guess.

Your obsession with me is kinda cute. And im the one with no life lol.

You know how quick it is to load up chrome and post a comment? That 10 second didnt interfere with my life too much thanks for the concern tho.

& remarK was mod at the time and i ran by the comment idea by him so holla if you want it vouched for.

lmao stay stalking me tho, RULE's bitch. Even your homie knows you making yourself look mad dumb.

Grow up child.

**Phroxen** · #23 05-10-2012, 07:48 PM

@Ad Hominem From whatever they were a few months ago to whatever they are now.. no one would know the difference. Plus, one of those battles is 100%-0%.

**Phroxen** · 05-10-2012, 07:48 PM

@Ad Hominem From whatever they were a few months ago to whatever they are now.. no one would know the difference. Plus, one of those battles is 100%-0%.

**Insuppressible** · #24 05-10-2012, 07:49 PM

and i thought i made bad judgments

**Insuppressible** · 05-10-2012, 07:49 PM

and i thought i made bad judgments

**Louie Dawgs** · #25 05-10-2012, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

@Ad Hominem From whatever they were a few months ago to whatever they are now.. no one would know the difference. Plus, one of those battles is 100%-0%.

Perhaps, but if the voting was even somewhat close the strength of a moderator vote would tip the scales significantly in one direction. With that removed, it could easily go back to the other guy. It will still show as a win for RULE, but the percentages will show that he lost.

**Louie Dawgs** · 05-10-2012, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phroxen

@Ad Hominem From whatever they were a few months ago to whatever they are now.. no one would know the difference. Plus, one of those battles is 100%-0%.

Perhaps, but if the voting was even somewhat close the strength of a moderator vote would tip the scales significantly in one direction. With that removed, it could easily go back to the other guy. It will still show as a win for RULE, but the percentages will show that he lost.

**Phroxen** · #26 05-10-2012, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ad Hominem

Perhaps, but if the voting was even somewhat close the strength of a moderator vote would tip the scales significantly in one direction. With that removed, it could easily go back to the other guy. It will still show as a win for RULE, but the percentages will show that he lost.

C'mon, stop being stupid. How the fuck do you tip the scale in a 100% - 0% battle if you removed a vote for yourself? Think before you type.

**Phroxen** · 05-10-2012, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ad Hominem

Perhaps, but if the voting was even somewhat close the strength of a moderator vote would tip the scales significantly in one direction. With that removed, it could easily go back to the other guy. It will still show as a win for RULE, but the percentages will show that he lost.

C'mon, stop being stupid. How the fuck do you tip the scale in a 100% - 0% battle if you removed a vote for yourself? Think before you type.

**Louie Dawgs** · #27 05-10-2012, 07:56 PM

Well it wouldn't have to be that one, I'm assuming there are several battles you are referring to. I didn't read the whole thread.

**Louie Dawgs** · 05-10-2012, 07:56 PM

Well it wouldn't have to be that one, I'm assuming there are several battles you are referring to. I didn't read the whole thread.

**Just C** · #28 05-10-2012, 07:57 PM

Why hasn't anybody touched on he obvious flaw in all his being.

Why would RULE say "Votes in" in public view hen actually vote?

Nobody would do that. It would make much more sense to type up "Good Battle" and then vote, so it's subtle.

Nobody dickriding. If he voted for himself it would be addressed but he was obviously being sarcastic and you don't need to know that well to realise that.

**Just C** · 05-10-2012, 07:57 PM

Why hasn't anybody touched on he obvious flaw in all his being.

Why would RULE say "Votes in" in public view hen actually vote?

Nobody would do that. It would make much more sense to type up "Good Battle" and then vote, so it's subtle.

Nobody dickriding. If he voted for himself it would be addressed but he was obviously being sarcastic and you don't need to know that well to realise that.

**Krhyme Killz** · #29 05-11-2012, 09:00 AM

lmao...Prho you cool with me yo, but this was the ultimate failed snitching yo...

you shoulda addressed this in a pm or something...

**Krhyme Killz** · 05-11-2012, 09:00 AM

lmao...Prho you cool with me yo, but this was the ultimate failed snitching yo...

you shoulda addressed this in a pm or something...

Phonocide · #30 05-11-2012, 09:14 AM

Yeah, I think it's pretty obvious that RULE didn't/wouldn't vote on his own battles. He seems like a cool cat. However, that doesn't dismiss the fact that it's kinda awkward to give props to your own battles in third person. That's new to me... lol.

Phonocide · 05-11-2012, 09:14 AM

Yeah, I think it's pretty obvious that RULE didn't/wouldn't vote on his own battles. He seems like a cool cat. However, that doesn't dismiss the fact that it's kinda awkward to give props to your own battles in third person. That's new to me... lol.


	Start a battle Audio or Text or Video Vote on a battle to earn +1 credit!