|
12-23-2019, 04:25 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musashi
I find it hard to believe given they've both been on the site since like '06. They would have had to pretend to be separate people for like 14 years. Seems unlikely. I guess Rican could have got access to Swift's account at some point though.
|
It’s Rican we’re talking about. Are you aware of how many accounts that dude has on here????
I don’t think it’s fair that you’re now standing up for the guy now that he’s banned but dudes been under fire legit for the last few months. You could’ve slid in at anytime and said he’s not swift but you didn’t.
|
12-23-2019, 04:25 PM
|
#21
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musashi
I find it hard to believe given they've both been on the site since like '06. They would have had to pretend to be separate people for like 14 years. Seems unlikely. I guess Rican could have got access to Swift's account at some point though.
|
It’s Rican we’re talking about. Are you aware of how many accounts that dude has on here????
I don’t think it’s fair that you’re now standing up for the guy now that he’s banned but dudes been under fire legit for the last few months. You could’ve slid in at anytime and said he’s not swift but you didn’t.
|
|
|
12-23-2019, 04:29 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 28,184
Mentioned: 3426 Post(s)
Tagged: 69 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 32 Won / 5 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 3 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 187 Won / 34 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 11 Won / 5 Lost
|
Im certain the people who created Rican & Swift were two different human beings.
But we know for a fact that Rican logged onto the Swift account multiple times since october.
Amongst other things lol
|
12-23-2019, 04:29 PM
|
#22
|
Ranked Audio Record 32 Won / 5 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 3 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 187 Won / 34 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 11 Won / 5 Lost
Join Date: Aug 2009
Voted:
241
audio / 1977
text
Posts: 28,184
Mentioned: 3426 Post(s)
Tagged: 69 Thread(s)
|
Im certain the people who created Rican & Swift were two different human beings.
But we know for a fact that Rican logged onto the Swift account multiple times since october.
Amongst other things lol
|
Offline
|
|
12-23-2019, 04:43 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
nic just plays the devils advocate. legit has no real thoughts of his own.
|
12-23-2019, 04:43 PM
|
#23
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
nic just plays the devils advocate. legit has no real thoughts of his own.
|
|
|
12-23-2019, 04:57 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 688
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 5 Won / 3 Lost
|
There goes half of LB’s active accounts
__________________
I am the Ray of light which appears at your door and goes where it wishes.
|
12-23-2019, 04:57 PM
|
#24
|
Ranked Text Record 5 Won / 3 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2019
Voted:
16
audio / 41
text
Posts: 688
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
There goes half of LB’s active accounts
__________________
I am the Ray of light which appears at your door and goes where it wishes.
|
Offline
|
|
12-23-2019, 05:12 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 7 Thread(s)
|
About time.
Props to the staff.
|
12-23-2019, 05:12 PM
|
#25
|
Join Date: Mar 2019
Voted:
0 audio / 36
text
Posts: 354
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 7 Thread(s)
|
About time.
Props to the staff.
|
Offline
|
|
12-23-2019, 07:03 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punk
I don’t think it’s fair that you’re now standing up for the guy now that he’s banned but dudes been under fire legit for the last few months. You could’ve slid in at anytime and said he’s not swift but you didn’t.
|
I'm not really sticking up for him. I don't know the evidence against him and I don't pay attention to those "exposed" threads because 99% of the time they're bullshit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RULE
Im certain the people who created Rican & Swift were two different human beings.
|
This was my point. That's all.
|
12-23-2019, 07:03 PM
|
#26
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punk
I don’t think it’s fair that you’re now standing up for the guy now that he’s banned but dudes been under fire legit for the last few months. You could’ve slid in at anytime and said he’s not swift but you didn’t.
|
I'm not really sticking up for him. I don't know the evidence against him and I don't pay attention to those "exposed" threads because 99% of the time they're bullshit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RULE
Im certain the people who created Rican & Swift were two different human beings.
|
This was my point. That's all.
|
|
|
12-23-2019, 07:13 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,405
Mentioned: 543 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 17 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 47 Won / 6 Lost
|
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.
In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @ Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
__________________
seul
adjective
1. on one’s own ⧫ alone
|
12-23-2019, 07:13 PM
|
#27
|
Ranked Audio Record 17 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 47 Won / 6 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2017
Voted:
105
audio / 603
text
Posts: 1,405
Mentioned: 543 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)
|
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.
In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @ Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
__________________
seul
adjective
1. on one’s own ⧫ alone
|
Offline
|
|
12-23-2019, 07:19 PM
|
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 556
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 10 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seul
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.
In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @ Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
|
Banning multis isn't the move, chief. Think of how much fun you're preventing for people who don't use them nefariously. Consider Danny Tanner, as an example. Or any of Brayne Ded's multis. That's why no one's jumping on board the ban multis train.
|
12-23-2019, 07:19 PM
|
#28
|
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 10 Lost
Join Date: Jul 2019
Voted:
1
audio / 54
text
Posts: 556
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seul
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.
In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @ Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
|
Banning multis isn't the move, chief. Think of how much fun you're preventing for people who don't use them nefariously. Consider Danny Tanner, as an example. Or any of Brayne Ded's multis. That's why no one's jumping on board the ban multis train.
|
Offline
|
|
12-23-2019, 07:32 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seul
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.
In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @ Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
|
I agree that decisions to ban people that aren't entirely clear cut need to be decided by a jury of moderators, that's what the mods have always done.
I think I'm being misinterpreted here as being anti-banning Rican. I'm not, I haven't seen any of the evidence. And, maybe if I had one gripe it would be that staff has always taken a policy of being far too much of an in-crowd. The facts daren't be shared with the userbase and if I had it my way it would be a lot more open but it is what it is. I'll just take your word for it.
As for multi-accounts I'm definitely not for banning multi-accounts. The reason being that I've seen it, it's been past policy. It doesn't work. Plus, some of the absolute best moments on LB have been as a result of multi-accounts.
- YOU WISH winning multiple titles, including audio and then being revealed as UA.
- Meta4 being revealed as MahVulus.
- Rican, Swiftkeys, Jimmy Backhandz and all of the multies that were around back in the SMACK days... and it was actually entertaining. Not a source of bad blood.
It didn't work before, it won't work now. If people want to cheat, they will and in reality people don't cheat that much. This site is easy as hell to moderate when X & Pugz are ghost so let's roll with the punches and have fun.
|
12-23-2019, 07:32 PM
|
#29
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seul
What-up, Nicholas. Friend here, the thing is, you're right, the exposed threads are bullshit, 99% of the time the man in question get's away with whatever bullshit he pulled, as a former mod, and veteran of the site, you are completely aware that it's virtually impossible to get stone cold evidence against someone, which is what these people prey on, in Rican's case, he fucked up and gave himself away, but I truly believe, going forward, for future cases, it should be done the way a jury decides a mans fate, with deliberation, factoring in all the information they have (in a lot of real life cases, not all details are known) factor in their intentions, their previous tendencies, and come up with a verdict.
In my honest and humble opinion, and I don't know why no ones actually giving any attention to @ Aggo or my posts about this, we need to ban multis, I can literally say, 99% of all cheating cases (other than obvious bites and what not) stem from Multis. We need to remove them, there really is no need, I can't figure out one reason for a multi, thats a strong enough point, that would withhold them from being banned.
|
I agree that decisions to ban people that aren't entirely clear cut need to be decided by a jury of moderators, that's what the mods have always done.
I think I'm being misinterpreted here as being anti-banning Rican. I'm not, I haven't seen any of the evidence. And, maybe if I had one gripe it would be that staff has always taken a policy of being far too much of an in-crowd. The facts daren't be shared with the userbase and if I had it my way it would be a lot more open but it is what it is. I'll just take your word for it.
As for multi-accounts I'm definitely not for banning multi-accounts. The reason being that I've seen it, it's been past policy. It doesn't work. Plus, some of the absolute best moments on LB have been as a result of multi-accounts.
- YOU WISH winning multiple titles, including audio and then being revealed as UA.
- Meta4 being revealed as MahVulus.
- Rican, Swiftkeys, Jimmy Backhandz and all of the multies that were around back in the SMACK days... and it was actually entertaining. Not a source of bad blood.
It didn't work before, it won't work now. If people want to cheat, they will and in reality people don't cheat that much. This site is easy as hell to moderate when X & Pugz are ghost so let's roll with the punches and have fun.
|
|
|
12-23-2019, 07:32 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,405
Mentioned: 543 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 17 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 47 Won / 6 Lost
|
Then the issue continues, if there's a multi that wants to fuck around for fun, just message a member of staff and prove you're who you say you are by sending a PM on your main, its not difficult to get around.
__________________
seul
adjective
1. on one’s own ⧫ alone
|
12-23-2019, 07:32 PM
|
#30
|
Ranked Audio Record 17 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 47 Won / 6 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2017
Voted:
105
audio / 603
text
Posts: 1,405
Mentioned: 543 Post(s)
Tagged: 21 Thread(s)
|
Then the issue continues, if there's a multi that wants to fuck around for fun, just message a member of staff and prove you're who you say you are by sending a PM on your main, its not difficult to get around.
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.
|
|
|