FVC Contests Archives.

[NOBLE]

@JOSH™ vs @GRizzEAT
Battle: Prince wood vs Sick Ritual
GRizzEAT Voted: Prince wood: 3 / Sick Ritual: 5
JOSH™ Voted: Prince wood: 1 / Sick Ritual: 3
You were both spot on in terms of what you pointed out that was wrong with each verse. JOSH went a little bit more into details, which could have been helpful. GRizzEAT, I felt your ratings for the battlers were too high. JOSH, I liked that you offered them ways of improving, but I honestly don't think these guys are at the stage where they can benefit from reading a RULE or UA battle. They have to first understand basic concepts like how to form a punch and add complexity before they'll know what to look for when they read examples from someone who does it well. In this match, I felt JOSH brought more to his vote. Vote: JOSH™

---------- Post added 09-01-2012 at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was 08-31-2012 at 11:44 PM ----------

@Xplissit vs @MadVerbs
Battle: NothingTwoSeaHear vs DrFunny
MadVerbs Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 3 / DrFunny: 4
Xplissit Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 2 / DrFunny: 3
MadVerbs, your expo was short, concise and straight to the point. I kind of wish you had been a bit more direct and personalized though. Xplissit, your expo was way too long. Bar for bar is usually the best type of expo, but in this case where there was an obvious winner and both battlers aren't really that strong or complex, I didn't feel it was necessary. Plus when you do bar for bar breakdowns, copying and pasting the battler's own lines only makes the expo bloated. You could have simply referred to the bars without repeating each one. Decent votes from both, but I felt Xplissit brought a little more to the vote here. Vote: Xplissit

[NOBLE]

@JOSH™ vs @GRizzEAT
Battle: Prince wood vs Sick Ritual
GRizzEAT Voted: Prince wood: 3 / Sick Ritual: 5
JOSH™ Voted: Prince wood: 1 / Sick Ritual: 3
You were both spot on in terms of what you pointed out that was wrong with each verse. JOSH went a little bit more into details, which could have been helpful. GRizzEAT, I felt your ratings for the battlers were too high. JOSH, I liked that you offered them ways of improving, but I honestly don't think these guys are at the stage where they can benefit from reading a RULE or UA battle. They have to first understand basic concepts like how to form a punch and add complexity before they'll know what to look for when they read examples from someone who does it well. In this match, I felt JOSH brought more to his vote. Vote: JOSH™

---------- Post added 09-01-2012 at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was 08-31-2012 at 11:44 PM ----------

@Xplissit vs @MadVerbs
Battle: NothingTwoSeaHear vs DrFunny
MadVerbs Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 3 / DrFunny: 4
Xplissit Voted: NothingTwoSeaHear: 2 / DrFunny: 3
MadVerbs, your expo was short, concise and straight to the point. I kind of wish you had been a bit more direct and personalized though. Xplissit, your expo was way too long. Bar for bar is usually the best type of expo, but in this case where there was an obvious winner and both battlers aren't really that strong or complex, I didn't feel it was necessary. Plus when you do bar for bar breakdowns, copying and pasting the battler's own lines only makes the expo bloated. You could have simply referred to the bars without repeating each one. Decent votes from both, but I felt Xplissit brought a little more to the vote here. Vote: Xplissit

[NOBLE]

@GRizzEAT vs @OSKAR
Battle: UrBaN iNdIaN vs DeftnessTemper
GRizzEAT Voted: Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 4 / DeftnessTemper: 3
OSKAR Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 5 / DeftnessTemper: 5
I felt you both had the right winner and accurate ratings, but your expos could have gone further. I think GRizzEAT had an edge because he at least offered something that might help them improve. Vote: GRizzEAT

[NOBLE]

@GRizzEAT vs @OSKAR
Battle: UrBaN iNdIaN vs DeftnessTemper
GRizzEAT Voted: Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 4 / DeftnessTemper: 3
OSKAR Voted: UrBaN iNdIaN: 5 / DeftnessTemper: 5
I felt you both had the right winner and accurate ratings, but your expos could have gone further. I think GRizzEAT had an edge because he at least offered something that might help them improve. Vote: GRizzEAT

[ILLoKWENT]

OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1


ok, this one both ratings were about on par wit what i wouldve gave, oskar, you were to the point, kept the vote short as usual, but at least you gave the battler somethin to refer to to help him.. although it still would be counter productive if they dont know what to look for in a better verse. i did like the fact you pointed out about the battler talkin bout himself which is a waste of bars.. . josh, your was pretty similar to oskar, but you went slightly more in depth with syllable counts etc.. you also made the same mistake imo , to refer the battler to someone elses verses under the assumption that they would know what to look for... both were about equal this time around, but im edging this one to oskar, because he pointed out a few more elements that needed corrections. my vote oskar

[ILLoKWENT]

OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1


ok, this one both ratings were about on par wit what i wouldve gave, oskar, you were to the point, kept the vote short as usual, but at least you gave the battler somethin to refer to to help him.. although it still would be counter productive if they dont know what to look for in a better verse. i did like the fact you pointed out about the battler talkin bout himself which is a waste of bars.. . josh, your was pretty similar to oskar, but you went slightly more in depth with syllable counts etc.. you also made the same mistake imo , to refer the battler to someone elses verses under the assumption that they would know what to look for... both were about equal this time around, but im edging this one to oskar, because he pointed out a few more elements that needed corrections. my vote oskar

[NOBLE]

@JOSH™ vs @Xplissit
Battle: Ilovehoochies vs ENGINEER
Xplissit Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 3
JOSH™ Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 4
Xplissit, I felt you could have done without pasting the lines from the battle and just delved into the expo. You both gave full critiques. I like the fact that Xplissit showed how he scored each bar along the way. The main difference to me was in tone. I felt that JOSH had more of a balance in mixing negative criticism and positive remarks about what the battlers did right. JOSH also pointed out more things they can do to improve, whereas Xplissit spent more time telling them how not strong they are. My vote for this match goes to JOSH™

---------- Post added at 05:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:51 AM ----------

@JOSH™ vs @OSKAR
Battle: kartoondmv vs buc without the k
OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1
You both mentioned that kartoondmv was lacking punches, but JOSH tried to explain it further by saying he also needed to add a set-up. Although, I did feel those were generic terms. When you told him he needed punches, neither one of you explained what that meant. I'm not saying I expected you to explain it bringing more technical terms that he might not be familiar with. I just wish you guys had explained why its needed in his verse in simpler terms. JOSH added that he should up his multies to 4 syllables, but while doing so, you also seemed to suggest that it was multi-syllables that add complexity, which I don't agree with. OSKAR cautioned him to avoid talking about himself as opposed to his opponent, which JOSH didn't really get into. You both offered suggestions of who he should read. This was pretty close, but I felt OSKAR had the edge in this one. Vote: OSKAR

---------- Post added at 05:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:16 AM ----------

@GRizzEAT vs @MadVerbs
Battle: ~QUANTIZATION~ vs buc without the k
GRizzEAT Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 6 / buc without the k: 5
MadVerbs Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 3 / buc without the k: 1
GRizzEAT offered expos for both battlers, but since buc without the k was disqualified in this battle, I'm only considering the expos you both gave to ~QUANTIZATION~. GRizzEAT was direct and had a personalized bar by bar breakdown, which I felt could have been very useful to the battler. Everything you said was on point. You even had some humor to your expo when you told him " its QUALITY Over KWONTITY." Lol! I think this was your best vote throughout all 3 rounds. MadVerbs, I felt your rating of 3 for ~QUANTIZATION~ was a bit low. I agreed with your assessment and suggestions, but I felt the fact your were indirect made it not as helpful as it could have been. You also didn't cover as many aspects of the battle as GRizzEAT. Vote: GRizzEAT

---------- Post added at 06:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 AM ----------

So all we need is @Dissizit™ to drop 2 more votes: 1 one on StrongSide vs OSKAR and the other on JOSH™ vs OSKAR. Here are the point totals so far:
@GRizzEAT (6 pts)
@JOSH™ (5 pts)+1
@StK StrongSide (5 pts)+1
@Xplissit (4 pts)
@MadVerbs (3 pts)
@OSKAR (2 pts)+2
JOSH and StK StrongSide both have the potential of earning another point. OSKAR has the potential of earning 2 more points. Because we only need 2 Text FVC members at this time, only the top two will be selected. In the event of a tie, I will make the selection. The sooner @Dissizit™ drops his votes, the sooner I can get y'all inducted...hopefully by tomorrow evening. To everyone who didn't make it, thanks for participating. You're more than welcomed to retry next month as we will be holding similar FVC entrace contests at the end of each month.

[NOBLE]

@JOSH™ vs @Xplissit
Battle: Ilovehoochies vs ENGINEER
Xplissit Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 3
JOSH™ Voted: Ilovehoochies: 2 / ENGINEER: 4
Xplissit, I felt you could have done without pasting the lines from the battle and just delved into the expo. You both gave full critiques. I like the fact that Xplissit showed how he scored each bar along the way. The main difference to me was in tone. I felt that JOSH had more of a balance in mixing negative criticism and positive remarks about what the battlers did right. JOSH also pointed out more things they can do to improve, whereas Xplissit spent more time telling them how not strong they are. My vote for this match goes to JOSH™

---------- Post added at 05:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:51 AM ----------

@JOSH™ vs @OSKAR
Battle: kartoondmv vs buc without the k
OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1
You both mentioned that kartoondmv was lacking punches, but JOSH tried to explain it further by saying he also needed to add a set-up. Although, I did feel those were generic terms. When you told him he needed punches, neither one of you explained what that meant. I'm not saying I expected you to explain it bringing more technical terms that he might not be familiar with. I just wish you guys had explained why its needed in his verse in simpler terms. JOSH added that he should up his multies to 4 syllables, but while doing so, you also seemed to suggest that it was multi-syllables that add complexity, which I don't agree with. OSKAR cautioned him to avoid talking about himself as opposed to his opponent, which JOSH didn't really get into. You both offered suggestions of who he should read. This was pretty close, but I felt OSKAR had the edge in this one. Vote: OSKAR

---------- Post added at 05:36 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:16 AM ----------

@GRizzEAT vs @MadVerbs
Battle: ~QUANTIZATION~ vs buc without the k
GRizzEAT Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 6 / buc without the k: 5
MadVerbs Voted: ~QUANTIZATION~: 3 / buc without the k: 1
GRizzEAT offered expos for both battlers, but since buc without the k was disqualified in this battle, I'm only considering the expos you both gave to ~QUANTIZATION~. GRizzEAT was direct and had a personalized bar by bar breakdown, which I felt could have been very useful to the battler. Everything you said was on point. You even had some humor to your expo when you told him " its QUALITY Over KWONTITY." Lol! I think this was your best vote throughout all 3 rounds. MadVerbs, I felt your rating of 3 for ~QUANTIZATION~ was a bit low. I agreed with your assessment and suggestions, but I felt the fact your were indirect made it not as helpful as it could have been. You also didn't cover as many aspects of the battle as GRizzEAT. Vote: GRizzEAT

---------- Post added at 06:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:36 AM ----------

So all we need is @Dissizit™ to drop 2 more votes: 1 one on StrongSide vs OSKAR and the other on JOSH™ vs OSKAR. Here are the point totals so far:
@GRizzEAT (6 pts)
@JOSH™ (5 pts)+1
@StK StrongSide (5 pts)+1
@Xplissit (4 pts)
@MadVerbs (3 pts)
@OSKAR (2 pts)+2
JOSH and StK StrongSide both have the potential of earning another point. OSKAR has the potential of earning 2 more points. Because we only need 2 Text FVC members at this time, only the top two will be selected. In the event of a tie, I will make the selection. The sooner @Dissizit™ drops his votes, the sooner I can get y'all inducted...hopefully by tomorrow evening. To everyone who didn't make it, thanks for participating. You're more than welcomed to retry next month as we will be holding similar FVC entrace contests at the end of each month.

[Phracture]

StrongSide vs OSKAR

OSKAR Voted: chavito: 6 / Merku: 5
StK StrongSide Voted: chavito: 4 / Merku: 4

I Feel Strong Came Of as a Better Vote Because he Got More In Depth with the Battles And Gave Advice On How To Help the Textcee Where Oskar Just Pointed Out What They Lacked In their Bout So Im Gonna Vote STRONG

---------- Post added at 02:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:13 AM ----------

JOSH™ vs OSKAR

OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1

I think that Oskar Dropped A Better Vote Because He Refered them To People They Can Read On In The Transition Of Being a Better Textcee He Broke Down Flaws and Also Exposed One For Biting Which Kind Shows A Level Of In depth Investion On Line for Line In My Opinion It Kind Seems like he was more In tune with the battle But Minus him Exposing him I still Feel Like he Slightly Voted Better . Vote OSKAR

[Phracture]

StrongSide vs OSKAR

OSKAR Voted: chavito: 6 / Merku: 5
StK StrongSide Voted: chavito: 4 / Merku: 4

I Feel Strong Came Of as a Better Vote Because he Got More In Depth with the Battles And Gave Advice On How To Help the Textcee Where Oskar Just Pointed Out What They Lacked In their Bout So Im Gonna Vote STRONG

---------- Post added at 02:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:13 AM ----------

JOSH™ vs OSKAR

OSKAR Voted: kartoondmv: 4 / buc without the k: 1
JOSH™ Voted: kartoondmv: 3 / buc without the k: 1

I think that Oskar Dropped A Better Vote Because He Refered them To People They Can Read On In The Transition Of Being a Better Textcee He Broke Down Flaws and Also Exposed One For Biting Which Kind Shows A Level Of In depth Investion On Line for Line In My Opinion It Kind Seems like he was more In tune with the battle But Minus him Exposing him I still Feel Like he Slightly Voted Better . Vote OSKAR

[NOBLE]

I'd like to thank the judges for committing to this and sharing insight and experience. I'd also like to thank everyone who showed up and dropped reasoned votes. If you didn't make it in this time, I will ensure that there's always an opportunity for any fair voter to be apart of the FVC. The next recruitment drive will take place around the end of September and you are all welcome to sign up.
Here are the final standings:
@GRizzEAT (6 pts)
@StK StrongSide (6 pts)
@JOSH™ (5 pts)
@Xplissit (4 pts)
@MadVerbs (3 pts)
@OSKAR (3 pts)
GRizzEAT and StK StrongSide will be inducted into the Fair Voters Club.
Thread closed.

[NOBLE]

I'd like to thank the judges for committing to this and sharing insight and experience. I'd also like to thank everyone who showed up and dropped reasoned votes. If you didn't make it in this time, I will ensure that there's always an opportunity for any fair voter to be apart of the FVC. The next recruitment drive will take place around the end of September and you are all welcome to sign up.
Here are the final standings:
@GRizzEAT (6 pts)
@StK StrongSide (6 pts)
@JOSH™ (5 pts)
@Xplissit (4 pts)
@MadVerbs (3 pts)
@OSKAR (3 pts)
GRizzEAT and StK StrongSide will be inducted into the Fair Voters Club.
Thread closed.

[NOBLE]

WELCOME TO THE OCTOBER BRACKETS FOR The Text Fair Voter's Club MEMBERSHIP SELECTION

BRACKETS

<img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=890609&dateline=1349822649" width="118" height="106" alt="Enfinite" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=890417&dateline=1348604259" width="118" height="106" alt="Path" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=872284&dateline=1345180552" width="118" height="106" alt="Dissizit™" />

JUDGES

@Enfinite, @Path, @Dissizit™

ROUND 1 BATTLES(OCT02ND)

@DeathWiSHeZ vs @Jimmy Dean™ VOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447010)

VOTED@Inception vs @MadVerbsVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447006)

VOTED@Ray BaRz™ vs @The GeneralizationVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=446996)

ROUND 2 BATTLES(OCT04TH)

(3 pts)VOTED@Inception vs @DeathWiSHeZVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447132)

(3 pts)VOTED@Ray BaRz™ vs @MadVerbsVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447126)

(3 pts)VOTED@Jimmy Dean™ vs @The GeneralizationVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447120)

ROUND 3 BATTLES(OCT06TH)

(3 pts)VOTED@Jimmy Dean™ vs @InceptionVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447294)

@MadVerbs vs @The GeneralizationVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447289)

VOTED@DeathWiSHeZ vs @Ray BaRz™VOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447293)

This will be a 3-round contest where candidates will be paired and each pair is given the same link to an actual current battle to vote on, and you will then be judged on who dropped the better overall vote/expo/rating. In each round, you will be paired with a different opponent that is chosen by an online randomizer. There will be 3 FVC judges assigned to assess each pair's votes, and you will receive 1 point for every judge vote you get. A no-show will earn you 0 points. After the 3 rounds, the top 2 text voters who have accumulated the most points will be the ones inducted into the Fair Voter's Club. The maximum points a voter may amass is 9. For any voter who amasses 7 or more points, you will be awarded an emcee item.
A random text battle will be assigned to each pair by me. The battles will have at least 48 hours before they close to give you the maximum amount of time to get your votes in. You will know the battles you must vote on the same day that the round opens, and I will also PM everyone to let them know when the rounds open. The rounds will open on these specific days:

ROUND 1: OCT 02nd
ROUND 2: OCT 04TH
ROUND 3: OCT 06TH

For each voter, consider your round closed when the battle you are assigned has closed. The judges will cast their votes on who won between each pair after both have voted and the assigned battle has closed. The points will be tallied later and updated once the judges have spoken.

Either left or right may vote first, however, both contestants must vote before the battle closes, otherwise you will earn 0 points. You will be assigned battles that open on the same day as the round to give you the maximum time to vote (up to 3 days).
Battles close after all 3 judges have dropped their analyses, and they will do so in this thread after both people in the pair have voted and the assigned battle has closed. Judges are encouraged to give an explanation behind their decisions, but if they don't, you may ask them privately. If one judge no-shows, I may step in as a replacement judge or find another mod or FVC member to judge the votes, especially in cases where a voter and a judge are in the same crew.[PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:] You may use more than one comment to drop your vote, but if you do, they must be successive (one right after the other) and I will use the timestamp to validate "successiveness". You shouldn't drop a comment then come back hours later after your opponent or someone else has dropped their feedback to come include something you priorly forgot in your expo. That will get you disqualified. Also, DO NOT refer to your opponent or anything your opponent has said in his expo in your own. If you cannot vote on your assigned battle for whatever reason, (the person has you blocked or is a member of the same crew as your multi account, etc) let me know ASAP and I will try to assign you another battle. I wish you all Good luck!

[NOBLE]

WELCOME TO THE OCTOBER BRACKETS FOR The Text Fair Voter's Club MEMBERSHIP SELECTION

BRACKETS

<img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=890609&dateline=1349822649" width="118" height="106" alt="Enfinite" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=890417&dateline=1348604259" width="118" height="106" alt="Path" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=872284&dateline=1345180552" width="118" height="106" alt="Dissizit™" />

JUDGES

@Enfinite, @Path, @Dissizit™

ROUND 1 BATTLES(OCT02ND)

@DeathWiSHeZ vs @Jimmy Dean™ VOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447010)

VOTED@Inception vs @MadVerbsVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447006)

VOTED@Ray BaRz™ vs @The GeneralizationVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=446996)

ROUND 2 BATTLES(OCT04TH)

(3 pts)VOTED@Inception vs @DeathWiSHeZVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447132)

(3 pts)VOTED@Ray BaRz™ vs @MadVerbsVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447126)

(3 pts)VOTED@Jimmy Dean™ vs @The GeneralizationVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447120)

ROUND 3 BATTLES(OCT06TH)

(3 pts)VOTED@Jimmy Dean™ vs @InceptionVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447294)

@MadVerbs vs @The GeneralizationVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447289)

VOTED@DeathWiSHeZ vs @Ray BaRz™VOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=tb&id=447293)

This will be a 3-round contest where candidates will be paired and each pair is given the same link to an actual current battle to vote on, and you will then be judged on who dropped the better overall vote/expo/rating. In each round, you will be paired with a different opponent that is chosen by an online randomizer. There will be 3 FVC judges assigned to assess each pair's votes, and you will receive 1 point for every judge vote you get. A no-show will earn you 0 points. After the 3 rounds, the top 2 text voters who have accumulated the most points will be the ones inducted into the Fair Voter's Club. The maximum points a voter may amass is 9. For any voter who amasses 7 or more points, you will be awarded an emcee item.
A random text battle will be assigned to each pair by me. The battles will have at least 48 hours before they close to give you the maximum amount of time to get your votes in. You will know the battles you must vote on the same day that the round opens, and I will also PM everyone to let them know when the rounds open. The rounds will open on these specific days:

ROUND 1: OCT 02nd
ROUND 2: OCT 04TH
ROUND 3: OCT 06TH

For each voter, consider your round closed when the battle you are assigned has closed. The judges will cast their votes on who won between each pair after both have voted and the assigned battle has closed. The points will be tallied later and updated once the judges have spoken.

Either left or right may vote first, however, both contestants must vote before the battle closes, otherwise you will earn 0 points. You will be assigned battles that open on the same day as the round to give you the maximum time to vote (up to 3 days).
Battles close after all 3 judges have dropped their analyses, and they will do so in this thread after both people in the pair have voted and the assigned battle has closed. Judges are encouraged to give an explanation behind their decisions, but if they don't, you may ask them privately. If one judge no-shows, I may step in as a replacement judge or find another mod or FVC member to judge the votes, especially in cases where a voter and a judge are in the same crew.[PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:] You may use more than one comment to drop your vote, but if you do, they must be successive (one right after the other) and I will use the timestamp to validate "successiveness". You shouldn't drop a comment then come back hours later after your opponent or someone else has dropped their feedback to come include something you priorly forgot in your expo. That will get you disqualified. Also, DO NOT refer to your opponent or anything your opponent has said in his expo in your own. If you cannot vote on your assigned battle for whatever reason, (the person has you blocked or is a member of the same crew as your multi account, etc) let me know ASAP and I will try to assign you another battle. I wish you all Good luck!

[izayamoorman]

Let's Get This Show On The Road, Folks!

[izayamoorman]

Let's Get This Show On The Road, Folks!

Got.my 1st round vote in.

Got.my 1st round vote in.

[NOBLE]

WELCOME TO THE OCTOBER BRACKETS FOR The Audio Fair Voter's Club MEMBERSHIP SELECTION

BRACKETS

<img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=863605&dateline=1331075156" width="118" height="106" alt="Murderous Swag" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=64737" width="118" height="106" alt="2FUEL" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=880334&dateline=1337044637" width="118" height="106" alt="NOBLE" />

JUDGES

@Murderous Swag, @2FUEL, @NOBLE

ROUND 1 BATTLES(OCT02ND)

(3 pts)VETO@Veto vs @Chemist The MenaceVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586256)

(3 pts)VOTED@Just C vs @~SHINIGAMI~
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586147)

(2 pts)VOTED@S1 The Sick vs @striccVOTED(1 pts)
((http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586174))

ROUND 2 BATTLES(OCT04TH)

@~SHINIGAMI~ vs @Veto
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586369)

(3 pts)VOTED@S1 The Sick vs @Chemist The MenaceVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586403)

VOTED@stricc vs @Just CVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586298)

ROUND 3 BATTLES(OCT06TH)

@~SHINIGAMI~ vs @striccVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586747)

@Veto vs @S1 The SickVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586753)

(3 pts)VOTED@Chemist The Menace vs @Just C
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586718)

This will be a 3-round contest where candidates will be paired and each pair is given the same link to an actual current battle to vote on, and you will then be judged on who dropped the better overall vote/expo/rating. In each round, you will be paired with a different opponent that is chosen by an online randomizer. There will be 3 FVC judges assigned to assess each pair's votes, and you will receive 1 point for every judge vote you get. A no-show will earn you 0 points. After the 3 rounds, the top 2 audio voters who have accumulated the most points will be the ones inducted into the Fair Voter's Club. The maximum points a voter may amass is 9. For any voter who amasses 7 or more points, you will be awarded an emcee item.
A random audio battle will be assigned to each pair by me. The battles will have at least 48 hours before they close to give you the maximum amount of time to get your votes in. You will know the battles you must vote on the same day that the round opens, and I will also PM everyone to let them know when the rounds open. The rounds will open on these specific days:

ROUND 1: OCT 02nd
ROUND 2: OCT 04TH
ROUND 3: OCT 06TH

For each voter, consider your round closed when the battle you are assigned has closed. The judges will cast their votes on who won between each pair after both have voted and the assigned battle has closed. The points will be tallied later and updated once the judges have spoken.

Either left or right may vote first, however, both contestants must vote before the battle closes, otherwise you will earn 0 points. You will be assigned battles that open on the same day as the round to give you the maximum time to vote (up to 3 days).
Battles close after all 3 judges have dropped their analyses, and they will do so in this thread after both people in the pair have voted and the assigned battle has closed. Judges are encouraged to give an explanation behind their decisions, but if they don't, you may ask them privately. If one judge no-shows, I may step in as a replacement judge or find another mod or FVC member to judge the votes, especially in cases where a voter and a judge are in the same crew.[PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:] You may use more than one comment to drop your vote, but if you do, they must be successive (one right after the other) and I will use the timestamp to validate "successiveness". You shouldn't drop a comment then come back hours later after your opponent or someone else has dropped their feedback to come include something you priorly forgot in your expo. That will get you disqualified. Also, DO NOT refer to your opponent or anything your opponent has said in his expo in your own. If you cannot vote on your assigned battle for whatever reason, (the person has you blocked or is a member of the same crew as your multi account, etc) let me know ASAP and I will try to assign you another battle. I wish you all Good luck!

[NOBLE]

WELCOME TO THE OCTOBER BRACKETS FOR The Audio Fair Voter's Club MEMBERSHIP SELECTION

BRACKETS

<img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=863605&dateline=1331075156" width="118" height="106" alt="Murderous Swag" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=64737" width="118" height="106" alt="2FUEL" /><img src="http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/image.php?u=880334&dateline=1337044637" width="118" height="106" alt="NOBLE" />

JUDGES

@Murderous Swag, @2FUEL, @NOBLE

ROUND 1 BATTLES(OCT02ND)

(3 pts)VETO@Veto vs @Chemist The MenaceVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586256)

(3 pts)VOTED@Just C vs @~SHINIGAMI~
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586147)

(2 pts)VOTED@S1 The Sick vs @striccVOTED(1 pts)
((http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586174))

ROUND 2 BATTLES(OCT04TH)

@~SHINIGAMI~ vs @Veto
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586369)

(3 pts)VOTED@S1 The Sick vs @Chemist The MenaceVOTED
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586403)

VOTED@stricc vs @Just CVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586298)

ROUND 3 BATTLES(OCT06TH)

@~SHINIGAMI~ vs @striccVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586747)

@Veto vs @S1 The SickVOTED(3 pts)
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586753)

(3 pts)VOTED@Chemist The Menace vs @Just C
(http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...n=lb&id=586718)

This will be a 3-round contest where candidates will be paired and each pair is given the same link to an actual current battle to vote on, and you will then be judged on who dropped the better overall vote/expo/rating. In each round, you will be paired with a different opponent that is chosen by an online randomizer. There will be 3 FVC judges assigned to assess each pair's votes, and you will receive 1 point for every judge vote you get. A no-show will earn you 0 points. After the 3 rounds, the top 2 audio voters who have accumulated the most points will be the ones inducted into the Fair Voter's Club. The maximum points a voter may amass is 9. For any voter who amasses 7 or more points, you will be awarded an emcee item.
A random audio battle will be assigned to each pair by me. The battles will have at least 48 hours before they close to give you the maximum amount of time to get your votes in. You will know the battles you must vote on the same day that the round opens, and I will also PM everyone to let them know when the rounds open. The rounds will open on these specific days:

ROUND 1: OCT 02nd
ROUND 2: OCT 04TH
ROUND 3: OCT 06TH

For each voter, consider your round closed when the battle you are assigned has closed. The judges will cast their votes on who won between each pair after both have voted and the assigned battle has closed. The points will be tallied later and updated once the judges have spoken.

Either left or right may vote first, however, both contestants must vote before the battle closes, otherwise you will earn 0 points. You will be assigned battles that open on the same day as the round to give you the maximum time to vote (up to 3 days).
Battles close after all 3 judges have dropped their analyses, and they will do so in this thread after both people in the pair have voted and the assigned battle has closed. Judges are encouraged to give an explanation behind their decisions, but if they don't, you may ask them privately. If one judge no-shows, I may step in as a replacement judge or find another mod or FVC member to judge the votes, especially in cases where a voter and a judge are in the same crew.[PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:] You may use more than one comment to drop your vote, but if you do, they must be successive (one right after the other) and I will use the timestamp to validate "successiveness". You shouldn't drop a comment then come back hours later after your opponent or someone else has dropped their feedback to come include something you priorly forgot in your expo. That will get you disqualified. Also, DO NOT refer to your opponent or anything your opponent has said in his expo in your own. If you cannot vote on your assigned battle for whatever reason, (the person has you blocked or is a member of the same crew as your multi account, etc) let me know ASAP and I will try to assign you another battle. I wish you all Good luck!