The Rican Topic

[RULE]

on my to-do list.

along with 10000000 other things.

LB Site Bible coming 2020

[RULE]

on my to-do list.

along with 10000000 other things.

LB Site Bible coming 2020

Originally Posted by IIAM

From what ii know and what LB history I’ve read
FACT is multis have always existed,
And they always will, even if you ban multis people will make them.

The site claims “Mods can see all multis.”
so what’s the issue?
What needs work clearly is making
Sure these accounts are being fair,
the way the site is policed-
We need to look at-
Accounts that pop up battle once or vote once
And then disappear need to be looked at.
Accounts that HV, accounts that crews
Are using constantly as snipe dummies.

The moderators can very easily see multis, without a doubt.
Every person who creates an account has their IP logged and sent to the moderators, so the moderators know full well who is behind every account, whether you like it or not. So the mods most certainly are lacking, they need to ban multi accounts, i'm completely shocked that it's still within the rules that you can make one? that doesnt make any sense to me.

Originally Posted by IIAM

From what ii know and what LB history I’ve read
FACT is multis have always existed,
And they always will, even if you ban multis people will make them.

The site claims “Mods can see all multis.”
so what’s the issue?
What needs work clearly is making
Sure these accounts are being fair,
the way the site is policed-
We need to look at-
Accounts that pop up battle once or vote once
And then disappear need to be looked at.
Accounts that HV, accounts that crews
Are using constantly as snipe dummies.

The moderators can very easily see multis, without a doubt.
Every person who creates an account has their IP logged and sent to the moderators, so the moderators know full well who is behind every account, whether you like it or not. So the mods most certainly are lacking, they need to ban multi accounts, i'm completely shocked that it's still within the rules that you can make one? that doesnt make any sense to me.

[Aggo]

#banmultis

The thing is you can log in from a library, college, work. You can use vpns. The IP scan obviously isnt perfect. If it were multis would be way easier to police. As it stands, it's difficult to stay on top of.

[Aggo]

#banmultis

The thing is you can log in from a library, college, work. You can use vpns. The IP scan obviously isnt perfect. If it were multis would be way easier to police. As it stands, it's difficult to stay on top of.

[Kiwi Peewee]

Originally Posted by Aggo

#banmultis

The thing is you can log in from a library, college, work. You can use vpns. The IP scan obviously isnt perfect. If it were multis would be way easier to police. As it stands, it's difficult to stay on top of.

That’s why banning multis won’t work. Anyone using one for nefarious reasons still can, and with a basic level of effort and competence can avoid detection. Banning multis will only stop the good guys, who just use them for fun and who bring a lot of humour and activity to the site. I think more comprehensive rules around multis and new accounts, like higher barriers to tournament entry and compulsory registering of multis with staff, is the best way to curb the malevolent multis but keep the innocent ones.

[Kiwi Peewee]

Originally Posted by Aggo

#banmultis

The thing is you can log in from a library, college, work. You can use vpns. The IP scan obviously isnt perfect. If it were multis would be way easier to police. As it stands, it's difficult to stay on top of.

That’s why banning multis won’t work. Anyone using one for nefarious reasons still can, and with a basic level of effort and competence can avoid detection. Banning multis will only stop the good guys, who just use them for fun and who bring a lot of humour and activity to the site. I think more comprehensive rules around multis and new accounts, like higher barriers to tournament entry and compulsory registering of multis with staff, is the best way to curb the malevolent multis but keep the innocent ones.

Y'all out here saying "They change the rules without updating the rules page?" Like this mod team aint out here doin shit. I'm 100% sure they out there doin shit for the site. I know RULE and Auto been doin shit for sure. X always been busy as shit cranking new shit out. This one little thing aint worth it honestly.

Y'all out here saying "They change the rules without updating the rules page?" Like this mod team aint out here doin shit. I'm 100% sure they out there doin shit for the site. I know RULE and Auto been doin shit for sure. X always been busy as shit cranking new shit out. This one little thing aint worth it honestly.

[IIAM]

Why do you keep trying to control
Something you clearly can’t? (This ban multis none sense)
Do your job and moderate battles!

Also some people here don’t see past
Their tournament titles.
@X has a business to run
Explain how less traffic multi or not
Is good for business?

Some of these employees brains
have a flawed code to text ratio lmfaoo

[IIAM]

Why do you keep trying to control
Something you clearly can’t? (This ban multis none sense)
Do your job and moderate battles!

Also some people here don’t see past
Their tournament titles.
@X has a business to run
Explain how less traffic multi or not
Is good for business?

Some of these employees brains
have a flawed code to text ratio lmfaoo

Originally Posted by Kiwi Peewee

That’s why banning multis won’t work. Anyone using one for nefarious reasons still can, and with a basic level of effort and competence can avoid detection. Banning multis will only stop the good guys, who just use them for fun and who bring a lot of humour and activity to the site. I think more comprehensive rules around multis and new accounts, like higher barriers to tournament entry and compulsory registering of multis with staff, is the best way to curb the malevolent multis but keep the innocent ones.

Okay agreed, completely. Everything you said is true.

Butttt, I draw the line when moderators KNOW regardless of VPNs etc, that somebody is another person, then they let is slide.

This isn't a debate on whether or not multis are good/bad, this a debate on whether or not is should be allowed. It's hard to detect people who dont want to be dected, agreed, but some people are very open about this stuff.

Originally Posted by Kiwi Peewee

That’s why banning multis won’t work. Anyone using one for nefarious reasons still can, and with a basic level of effort and competence can avoid detection. Banning multis will only stop the good guys, who just use them for fun and who bring a lot of humour and activity to the site. I think more comprehensive rules around multis and new accounts, like higher barriers to tournament entry and compulsory registering of multis with staff, is the best way to curb the malevolent multis but keep the innocent ones.

Okay agreed, completely. Everything you said is true.

Butttt, I draw the line when moderators KNOW regardless of VPNs etc, that somebody is another person, then they let is slide.

This isn't a debate on whether or not multis are good/bad, this a debate on whether or not is should be allowed. It's hard to detect people who dont want to be dected, agreed, but some people are very open about this stuff.