|
View Poll Results: Should Mods be allowed to link anyone threw i.m with battle links?
|
Yeah, It's not cheating they won't make a mistake ever!
|
|
3 |
30.00% |
Nahh, thats cheap as fuck and they should all eat dicks and change it
|
|
7 |
70.00% |
04-23-2012, 07:02 PM
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 62 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 75 Won / 24 Lost
|
Spoken like a true Topical Mod.
|
04-23-2012, 07:02 PM
|
#21
|
Ranked Audio Record 62 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 75 Won / 24 Lost
Join Date: Jan 2009
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: 12,716
Mentioned: 616 Post(s)
Tagged: 41 Thread(s)
|
Spoken like a true Topical Mod.
|
Offline
|
|
04-24-2012, 07:57 AM
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,959
Mentioned: 860 Post(s)
Tagged: 49 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 57 Won / 20 Lost
Ranked Text Record 40 Won / 16 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
@ SWAVY don't get on that i hate you shit cause tbh i really don't give a fuck if you get banned or not i just think the rule should be officially changed or what not to make it better and more equal .... Even tho what u did is dickridery imo it doesn't matter if the rule is just changed :S
It is what it is, take it how you wanna take it
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bnas
I have a gay friend
|
|
04-24-2012, 07:57 AM
|
#22
|
Ranked Audio Record 57 Won / 20 Lost
Ranked Text Record 40 Won / 16 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: May 2010
Voted:
188
audio / 156
text
Posts: 3,959
Mentioned: 860 Post(s)
Tagged: 49 Thread(s)
|
@ SWAVY don't get on that i hate you shit cause tbh i really don't give a fuck if you get banned or not i just think the rule should be officially changed or what not to make it better and more equal .... Even tho what u did is dickridery imo it doesn't matter if the rule is just changed :S
It is what it is, take it how you wanna take it
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bnas
I have a gay friend
|
|
Offline
|
|
04-24-2012, 02:18 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 457
Mentioned: 296 Post(s)
Tagged: 58 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 55 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 44 Won / 6 Lost
|
@ FiNAL WoRD lol u know ur a fag right....if u was real about wat u was saying u wulda spoke ya mind upfront instead of tryna slander me...dats wat bitches do....u wulda took it to da mods and let it be handled da proper way...but no u wanna bust out da woodworks with dis bullshit so fuck watchu think dnt play cool wit me and den come out da blue wit sum bs...now dats true bitchassness fuk outta here....if u wanted sum attention all u had 2 do was ask i got some shit 4 ya...
|
04-24-2012, 02:18 PM
|
#23
|
Spits That FIRE
Ranked Audio Record 55 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 44 Won / 6 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2011
Voted:
110
audio / 0 text
Posts: 457
Mentioned: 296 Post(s)
Tagged: 58 Thread(s)
|
@ FiNAL WoRD lol u know ur a fag right....if u was real about wat u was saying u wulda spoke ya mind upfront instead of tryna slander me...dats wat bitches do....u wulda took it to da mods and let it be handled da proper way...but no u wanna bust out da woodworks with dis bullshit so fuck watchu think dnt play cool wit me and den come out da blue wit sum bs...now dats true bitchassness fuk outta here....if u wanted sum attention all u had 2 do was ask i got some shit 4 ya...
|
Offline
|
|
04-24-2012, 02:26 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 505 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 54 Won / 9 Lost
|
uhh I kinda have to lean towards Final's side here. If it contained a link to your own battle, i'd expect one of us to get in trouble for linking to it, even if it's a thread holding the battle link it and I don't think that should be done by the mods. You can't force it to get votes or looked at. If it doesn't, it doesn't just abide by what has always been known as correct to do.
I am not completely against Swavy's side because I don't think he meant to actually cheat on his battles, but if Final never checks out your battles anyways and you know this then why would you Pm or IM him any links in the first place.
|
04-24-2012, 02:26 PM
|
#24
|
Ranked Text Record 54 Won / 9 Lost
Join Date: Aug 2011
Voted:
0 audio / 425
text
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 505 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
uhh I kinda have to lean towards Final's side here. If it contained a link to your own battle, i'd expect one of us to get in trouble for linking to it, even if it's a thread holding the battle link it and I don't think that should be done by the mods. You can't force it to get votes or looked at. If it doesn't, it doesn't just abide by what has always been known as correct to do.
I am not completely against Swavy's side because I don't think he meant to actually cheat on his battles, but if Final never checks out your battles anyways and you know this then why would you Pm or IM him any links in the first place.
|
Offline
|
|
04-24-2012, 02:42 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
No one take sides on beef sites anymore...That's for pussies
|
04-24-2012, 02:42 PM
|
#25
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
No one take sides on beef sites anymore...That's for pussies
|
|
|
04-24-2012, 03:07 PM
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,088
Mentioned: 3617 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
SWAVY has admitted to sending links to forums advertising a battle. That's not exactly the same as IM'ing or PM'ing a direct link to your battle. The rules, as far as I understand them, prohibits sending direct links to one's own battle. There was never anything explicitly prohibiting people linking to forums that advertise battles. As mods, we are expected to follow the rules as much as anyone else. We are also expected to use our own better judgement at times because not every scenario is accounted for by a rule. SWAVY used his own better judgement, which may be different from how others would have seen it, but I have absolutely no doubts that he ever intended to cheat.
This has been brought up in the staff forums, and I think if staff at this moment clarify and establish as a rule that PM'ing and IM'ing folks links to forums that advertise one's own battles is to be prohibited, then SWAVY will abide by that.
|
04-24-2012, 03:07 PM
|
#26
|
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: May 2011
Voted:
407
audio / 1061
text
Posts: 6,088
Mentioned: 3617 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
|
SWAVY has admitted to sending links to forums advertising a battle. That's not exactly the same as IM'ing or PM'ing a direct link to your battle. The rules, as far as I understand them, prohibits sending direct links to one's own battle. There was never anything explicitly prohibiting people linking to forums that advertise battles. As mods, we are expected to follow the rules as much as anyone else. We are also expected to use our own better judgement at times because not every scenario is accounted for by a rule. SWAVY used his own better judgement, which may be different from how others would have seen it, but I have absolutely no doubts that he ever intended to cheat.
This has been brought up in the staff forums, and I think if staff at this moment clarify and establish as a rule that PM'ing and IM'ing folks links to forums that advertise one's own battles is to be prohibited, then SWAVY will abide by that.
|
Offline
|
|
04-24-2012, 04:05 PM
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 505 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 54 Won / 9 Lost
|
It's the same thing as a direct link technically. You are still linking them to your battle and basically asking a specific person for a fair vote or to check it out. If you weren't intending that to them you wouldn't have sent them the link.
No matter what we will never know his intentions and can never believe without a proven truth, it will always be he/she said. But to fix the whole debate and PM's and IM's that put any members in a place where they are felt they have to vote or are asked to vote should be prohibited. Because just linking someone to a forum post that directly links to their battle to get a vote is just another way around and is bullshit.
To sum it up.. In A round about way that is the same fucking thing as a direct link. And in any case shouldn't go unnoticed. I'm not saying to punish him or anything but IMO this should def. be know known to not be allowed.
|
04-24-2012, 04:05 PM
|
#27
|
Ranked Text Record 54 Won / 9 Lost
Join Date: Aug 2011
Voted:
0 audio / 425
text
Posts: 1,513
Mentioned: 505 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
It's the same thing as a direct link technically. You are still linking them to your battle and basically asking a specific person for a fair vote or to check it out. If you weren't intending that to them you wouldn't have sent them the link.
No matter what we will never know his intentions and can never believe without a proven truth, it will always be he/she said. But to fix the whole debate and PM's and IM's that put any members in a place where they are felt they have to vote or are asked to vote should be prohibited. Because just linking someone to a forum post that directly links to their battle to get a vote is just another way around and is bullshit.
To sum it up.. In A round about way that is the same fucking thing as a direct link. And in any case shouldn't go unnoticed. I'm not saying to punish him or anything but IMO this should def. be know known to not be allowed.
|
Offline
|
|
04-24-2012, 07:31 PM
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,959
Mentioned: 860 Post(s)
Tagged: 49 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 57 Won / 20 Lost
Ranked Text Record 40 Won / 16 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ill Phenom
It's the same thing as a direct link technically. You are still linking them to your battle and basically asking a specific person for a fair vote or to check it out. If you weren't intending that to them you wouldn't have sent them the link.
No matter what we will never know his intentions and can never believe without a proven truth, it will always be he/she said. But to fix the whole debate and PM's and IM's that put any members in a place where they are felt they have to vote or are asked to vote should be prohibited. Because just linking someone to a forum post that directly links to their battle to get a vote is just another way around and is bullshit.
To sum it up.. In A round about way that is the same fucking thing as a direct link. And in any case shouldn't go unnoticed. I'm not saying to punish him or anything but IMO this should def. be know known to not be allowed.
|
That ^^^^^^^^^^
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bnas
I have a gay friend
|
|
04-24-2012, 07:31 PM
|
#28
|
Ranked Audio Record 57 Won / 20 Lost
Ranked Text Record 40 Won / 16 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: May 2010
Voted:
188
audio / 156
text
Posts: 3,959
Mentioned: 860 Post(s)
Tagged: 49 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ill Phenom
It's the same thing as a direct link technically. You are still linking them to your battle and basically asking a specific person for a fair vote or to check it out. If you weren't intending that to them you wouldn't have sent them the link.
No matter what we will never know his intentions and can never believe without a proven truth, it will always be he/she said. But to fix the whole debate and PM's and IM's that put any members in a place where they are felt they have to vote or are asked to vote should be prohibited. Because just linking someone to a forum post that directly links to their battle to get a vote is just another way around and is bullshit.
To sum it up.. In A round about way that is the same fucking thing as a direct link. And in any case shouldn't go unnoticed. I'm not saying to punish him or anything but IMO this should def. be know known to not be allowed.
|
That ^^^^^^^^^^
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 PM.
|
|
|