|
View Poll Results: Should Letsbeef be 18+?
|
Yes
|
|
4 |
28.57% |
No
|
|
10 |
71.43% |
Undecided
|
|
0 |
0% |
12-05-2018, 10:19 PM
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,501
Mentioned: 730 Post(s)
Tagged: 19 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 278 Won / 31 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 3 Won / 3 Lost
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant
Regardless of the age in question, 18, 13, 25, etc, I think the underlying issue is primarily the lack of age VERIFICATION. Restrictions totally aside. As I've previously expressed, without a verification system of some sort, there's no deterrent for the data collection from minors. Which is something that the privacy policy explicitly states the site doesn't do. In order to maintain that standing, it's important that there's some determinant of the age of the members, at least to administration. Even if that verification isn't publicly available information.
Edit: I, personally, still think the site should be 18+. But, my personal opinion aside, the previous remarks do still denote a pretty gaping hole in the site's policy. Even if I were to concede from my own standing.
|
NAH YOU DO RAISE A VALID POINT THAT X OR NOBLE MIGHT NOT OF ACTUALLY CONSIDERED...... DEFINATELY WORTH A DISCUSSION, THA LAW MAY CHANGE SOON ANYWAY WHERE WE ''HAVE'' TO DO AGE RESTRICTIONS, SHIT CHANGES ALL THA TIME AS X RECENTLY HAD TO ADD THA INFAMOUS ''DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT'' BUTTON LMAO
__________________
|
12-05-2018, 10:19 PM
|
#26
|
Ranked Text Record 278 Won / 31 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 3 Won / 3 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2006
Voted:
139
audio / 3320
text
Posts: 3,501
Mentioned: 730 Post(s)
Tagged: 19 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rant
Regardless of the age in question, 18, 13, 25, etc, I think the underlying issue is primarily the lack of age VERIFICATION. Restrictions totally aside. As I've previously expressed, without a verification system of some sort, there's no deterrent for the data collection from minors. Which is something that the privacy policy explicitly states the site doesn't do. In order to maintain that standing, it's important that there's some determinant of the age of the members, at least to administration. Even if that verification isn't publicly available information.
Edit: I, personally, still think the site should be 18+. But, my personal opinion aside, the previous remarks do still denote a pretty gaping hole in the site's policy. Even if I were to concede from my own standing.
|
NAH YOU DO RAISE A VALID POINT THAT X OR NOBLE MIGHT NOT OF ACTUALLY CONSIDERED...... DEFINATELY WORTH A DISCUSSION, THA LAW MAY CHANGE SOON ANYWAY WHERE WE ''HAVE'' TO DO AGE RESTRICTIONS, SHIT CHANGES ALL THA TIME AS X RECENTLY HAD TO ADD THA INFAMOUS ''DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT'' BUTTON LMAO
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.
|
|
|