New FVC team.

[Rai]

Due to the current lack of voting we will be looking for new FVC members. Some are inactive and or not voting regularly. Battles need to close on time. With a new team of FVC we may be able to get alot of good votes out. Post who you think should be in the FVC and why you think they deserve a spot. In my opinion some of the current FVC members like Shodan, Jimmy Hoffa, g u t s, and Griffey are good voters for the FVC, but are not actively voting like they should. There will be a 30 vote minimum monthly. So if you are a current member and would like to be active enough with voting to meet the quota specified , then by all means lay your own name down.

[Rai]

Due to the current lack of voting we will be looking for new FVC members. Some are inactive and or not voting regularly. Battles need to close on time. With a new team of FVC we may be able to get alot of good votes out. Post who you think should be in the FVC and why you think they deserve a spot. In my opinion some of the current FVC members like Shodan, Jimmy Hoffa, g u t s, and Griffey are good voters for the FVC, but are not actively voting like they should. There will be a 30 vote minimum monthly. So if you are a current member and would like to be active enough with voting to meet the quota specified , then by all means lay your own name down.

I'm not sure who is active enough right now, a few months ago i had a solid list. I currently recommend hoffa and shodan.

i also would like to be apart of the fvc, i can meet the 20 vote quota

I'm not sure who is active enough right now, a few months ago i had a solid list. I currently recommend hoffa and shodan.

i also would like to be apart of the fvc, i can meet the 20 vote quota

[REZN]

Is the quota per week, or per month?

Edit:

Also, will there be specified focuses for individual voters? E.G. 1-2 members voting only on battles ending soon with less than 3 votes. 1-2 voters voting on new battles with 0 votes, etc?

[REZN]

Is the quota per week, or per month?

Edit:

Also, will there be specified focuses for individual voters? E.G. 1-2 members voting only on battles ending soon with less than 3 votes. 1-2 voters voting on new battles with 0 votes, etc?

[Rai]

Originally Posted by Wretched

Is the quota per week, or per month?

Edit:

Also, will there be specified focuses for individual voters? E.G. 1-2 members voting only on battles ending soon with less than 3 votes. 1-2 voters voting on new battles with 0 votes, etc?

Monthly quota. No, no member will have certain responsibilities other than meeting quota and voting on ALL tournaments/contests and lbt/lba. But they should know what is vital to vote on.

[Rai]

Originally Posted by Wretched

Is the quota per week, or per month?

Edit:

Also, will there be specified focuses for individual voters? E.G. 1-2 members voting only on battles ending soon with less than 3 votes. 1-2 voters voting on new battles with 0 votes, etc?

Monthly quota. No, no member will have certain responsibilities other than meeting quota and voting on ALL tournaments/contests and lbt/lba. But they should know what is vital to vote on.

[REZN]

Originally Posted by Rai

Monthly quota. No, no member will have certain responsibilities other than meeting quota and voting on ALL tournaments/contests and lbt/lba. But they should know what is vital to vote on.

Not having those responsibilities is a big negative, in my opinion. One of the biggest issues right now, is battles not closing. If you're giving people the option to vote on what they want to vote on, that problem isn't resolved. Closing battles is more important than the tournaments and LBT/LBA.

[REZN]

Originally Posted by Rai

Monthly quota. No, no member will have certain responsibilities other than meeting quota and voting on ALL tournaments/contests and lbt/lba. But they should know what is vital to vote on.

Not having those responsibilities is a big negative, in my opinion. One of the biggest issues right now, is battles not closing. If you're giving people the option to vote on what they want to vote on, that problem isn't resolved. Closing battles is more important than the tournaments and LBT/LBA.

[Rai]

Originally Posted by Wretched

Not having those responsibilities is a big negative, in my opinion. One of the biggest issues right now, is battles not closing. If you're giving people the option to vote on what they want to vote on, that problem isn't resolved. Closing battles is more important than the tournaments and LBT/LBA.

I agree. But a the current members minus a few when FVC was restored a year ago, had no problems with closing out the battles. That's why we have FVC KING usertitles for incentive to vote on every battle they can. I, myself would start there, then go down the latest open battles. Some of the members voted on every battle that month. So no I dont see a point in putting members in certain voting categories, because if everybody is pulling their weight there shouldnt be any issues with battles closing.

[Rai]

Originally Posted by Wretched

Not having those responsibilities is a big negative, in my opinion. One of the biggest issues right now, is battles not closing. If you're giving people the option to vote on what they want to vote on, that problem isn't resolved. Closing battles is more important than the tournaments and LBT/LBA.

I agree. But a the current members minus a few when FVC was restored a year ago, had no problems with closing out the battles. That's why we have FVC KING usertitles for incentive to vote on every battle they can. I, myself would start there, then go down the latest open battles. Some of the members voted on every battle that month. So no I dont see a point in putting members in certain voting categories, because if everybody is pulling their weight there shouldnt be any issues with battles closing.

[REZN]

Cool beans. Hope it goes well.

[REZN]

Cool beans. Hope it goes well.

[EtH]

FVC has always been full of clowns. You cunts get a boner for long expos and don't actually look into the votes themselves. If you can't battle you can't vote, that simple.

[EtH]

FVC has always been full of clowns. You cunts get a boner for long expos and don't actually look into the votes themselves. If you can't battle you can't vote, that simple.

only problem I have with FVC is VP.

Whenever i do vote, I'm hands down one of the most fair nonfriendly beef aside voters here

yet a doofus like guts will have more VP than me. How does that make sense? Like said above, because he types 3 books for 1 vote?

only problem I have with FVC is VP.

Whenever i do vote, I'm hands down one of the most fair nonfriendly beef aside voters here

yet a doofus like guts will have more VP than me. How does that make sense? Like said above, because he types 3 books for 1 vote?

[Aggo]

If FVC members are voting as often as they should then they wouldnt need vp to counter poor voters because they would have the numbers. Just give everyone the same VP but make sure 3 to 4 members are voting on each battle. FVC members are not totally unbiased. Nobody is. But FVC tends to scue the same way. If 2 FCC members vote against me and one votes for me I'm only down 2 regular votes on a clearly split decision instead of 4.

[Aggo]

If FVC members are voting as often as they should then they wouldnt need vp to counter poor voters because they would have the numbers. Just give everyone the same VP but make sure 3 to 4 members are voting on each battle. FVC members are not totally unbiased. Nobody is. But FVC tends to scue the same way. If 2 FCC members vote against me and one votes for me I'm only down 2 regular votes on a clearly split decision instead of 4.