Would you participate in a crew draft/league?

Originally Posted by Rant

Cut the fat then.

How does ACs having inactive guys who don't vote anyways affect the rest of the site?

Originally Posted by Rant

Cut the fat then.

How does ACs having inactive guys who don't vote anyways affect the rest of the site?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

How does ACs having inactive guys who don't vote anyways affect the rest of the site?

How does kicking them affect ACs? Anbu has 11 members. All active. APOC has 16 MEMBERS. All active. This is affecting the voting. But, you can't expect them to want to contribute to YOUR crew members' battles voting wise by trimming their numbers, if you won't do it yourself.

You have this "I put my crew first" facade, man. But, reality is, you're hurting their battles because you won't cut the numbers back, in order to facilitate change on the part of others so that there are more votes to be spread around.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

How does ACs having inactive guys who don't vote anyways affect the rest of the site?

How does kicking them affect ACs? Anbu has 11 members. All active. APOC has 16 MEMBERS. All active. This is affecting the voting. But, you can't expect them to want to contribute to YOUR crew members' battles voting wise by trimming their numbers, if you won't do it yourself.

You have this "I put my crew first" facade, man. But, reality is, you're hurting their battles because you won't cut the numbers back, in order to facilitate change on the part of others so that there are more votes to be spread around.

Originally Posted by Rant

How does kicking them affect ACs?

Not relevant to the question. If I feel like having Letum in the crew, and it doesn't have a single negative impact on the site, what about that feels that you should be up in arms about it or call for his removal?

Originally Posted by Rant

How does kicking them affect ACs?

Not relevant to the question. If I feel like having Letum in the crew, and it doesn't have a single negative impact on the site, what about that feels that you should be up in arms about it or call for his removal?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Not relevant to the question. If I feel like having Letum in the crew, and it doesn't have a single negative impact on the site, what about that feels that you should be up in arms about it or call for his removal?

Go look at the math I did early. 60 votes. That's 60 votes you're costing your crew collectively. Compare it to 24. Wouldn't YOU want those other 36 votes?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Not relevant to the question. If I feel like having Letum in the crew, and it doesn't have a single negative impact on the site, what about that feels that you should be up in arms about it or call for his removal?

Go look at the math I did early. 60 votes. That's 60 votes you're costing your crew collectively. Compare it to 24. Wouldn't YOU want those other 36 votes?

Originally Posted by Rant

Go look at the math I did early. 60 votes. That's 60 votes you're costing your crew collectively. Compare it to 24. Wouldn't YOU want those other 36 votes?

You said that the limit you'd go for is between 5 and 9. ACs has 9 active members, therefore would fully fall into those guidelines.

If Letum is kicked from ACs, the crew members aren't going to suddenly start seeing votes from him...because he's not voting in the first place. It's irrelevant.

Originally Posted by Rant

Go look at the math I did early. 60 votes. That's 60 votes you're costing your crew collectively. Compare it to 24. Wouldn't YOU want those other 36 votes?

You said that the limit you'd go for is between 5 and 9. ACs has 9 active members, therefore would fully fall into those guidelines.

If Letum is kicked from ACs, the crew members aren't going to suddenly start seeing votes from him...because he's not voting in the first place. It's irrelevant.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

You said that the limit you'd go for is between 5 and 9. ACs has 9 active members, therefore would fully fall into those guidelines.

If Letum is kicked from ACs, the crew members aren't going to suddenly start seeing votes from him...because he's not voting in the first place. It's irrelevant.

What about those 60 votes from APOC, though, who are all active? If they have to kick members to meet a limit, you should to. It's that simple.

What if one of your inactive members has a spurt of activity? That puts you over the limit, right? Because based on your logic, they only fall into the realm of play based on their activity.

What if Dirty Work, as a mod decides he wants to drop a few votes, but all of the currently open battles are ACs battles?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

You said that the limit you'd go for is between 5 and 9. ACs has 9 active members, therefore would fully fall into those guidelines.

If Letum is kicked from ACs, the crew members aren't going to suddenly start seeing votes from him...because he's not voting in the first place. It's irrelevant.

What about those 60 votes from APOC, though, who are all active? If they have to kick members to meet a limit, you should to. It's that simple.

What if one of your inactive members has a spurt of activity? That puts you over the limit, right? Because based on your logic, they only fall into the realm of play based on their activity.

What if Dirty Work, as a mod decides he wants to drop a few votes, but all of the currently open battles are ACs battles?

Originally Posted by Rant

What about those 60 votes from APOC, though, who are all active? If they have to kick members to meet a limit, you should to. It's that simple.

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

Originally Posted by Rant

What about those 60 votes from APOC, though, who are all active? If they have to kick members to meet a limit, you should to. It's that simple.

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Well it's a good thing they don't have to then eh?

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

Originally Posted by Rant

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

Originally Posted by Rant

They should have to, though. And a lot of the people in your crew seem to agree. Lol.

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

The point is that activity doesn't determine membership. Being a member in the crew does.

The premise: Crew's should be limited to 6-9 members.

Not: 6-9 active members.

Because activity isn't definite, nor is inactivity. An inactive member has the capacity to become active, this would then supersede the initially defined limit in the supposed hypothetical.

ALL of the crews have too many members. Yours included.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

But your point is one of function. There are definitely personal reasons for ACs to perhaps attempt to remove some inactive members. But if your point is that Apoc has too many crew members so ACs has to release inactive members, it doesn't really add up.

The point is that activity doesn't determine membership. Being a member in the crew does.

The premise: Crew's should be limited to 6-9 members.

Not: 6-9 active members.

Because activity isn't definite, nor is inactivity. An inactive member has the capacity to become active, this would then supersede the initially defined limit in the supposed hypothetical.

ALL of the crews have too many members. Yours included.