Text Heavyweight Championship - January Roster Sign-Ups

[RULE]

i was thinking Milk Vs Aggo tbh.

Title match is undecided yet but i know who i want to face Esso.

[RULE]

i was thinking Milk Vs Aggo tbh.

Title match is undecided yet but i know who i want to face Esso.

I know Rule hasn't said this you're all just speculating but what would be the point of a first card if someone that isn't 1 - 0 doesn't get the title shot next month?

I know Rule hasn't said this you're all just speculating but what would be the point of a first card if someone that isn't 1 - 0 doesn't get the title shot next month?

[Louie Dawgs]

Originally Posted by Shodan

gb fv vb no h8

kys

[Louie Dawgs]

Originally Posted by Shodan

gb fv vb no h8

kys

Throw me On that Shit

Throw me On that Shit

I think almost all of these cards lack showcase and matchmaking. It was short lived, but my TRBz thing had a lot of people excited because it wasn't JUST a "league" or whatever.

Because DeNiro won't be around long, there's no point in building a shot. Give him the immediate title shot. Either the narrative of returning hall of famer getting the belt is built, or you give your first champ big name win and a fresh opponent.

In this stuff, matchmaking needs to be engaging. People need to be excited, and battling someone they've faced 20times isn't interesting.

Build rookies and prospects from the bottom against on another. When their record is good, use them to pad a more experienced guy's record and to build them to a title shot. Either use "legends" as automatic title shots, or one off attraction pieces ("freakshow fights") to bring more attention to the cards.

I think almost all of these cards lack showcase and matchmaking. It was short lived, but my TRBz thing had a lot of people excited because it wasn't JUST a "league" or whatever.

Because DeNiro won't be around long, there's no point in building a shot. Give him the immediate title shot. Either the narrative of returning hall of famer getting the belt is built, or you give your first champ big name win and a fresh opponent.

In this stuff, matchmaking needs to be engaging. People need to be excited, and battling someone they've faced 20times isn't interesting.

Build rookies and prospects from the bottom against on another. When their record is good, use them to pad a more experienced guy's record and to build them to a title shot. Either use "legends" as automatic title shots, or one off attraction pieces ("freakshow fights") to bring more attention to the cards.

I would agree with you if I didn't think there was a greater than 50% chance of a title no show. That would be 2 in a row. How many more 32 line verses is esso gonna write for no reason. Eventually he gets fed up and stops writing for them as well. How much longer before people stop signing up cuz some "legend" keeps getting bumped ahead of them when they've been putting in work.

I would agree with you if I didn't think there was a greater than 50% chance of a title no show. That would be 2 in a row. How many more 32 line verses is esso gonna write for no reason. Eventually he gets fed up and stops writing for them as well. How much longer before people stop signing up cuz some "legend" keeps getting bumped ahead of them when they've been putting in work.

[Subreal]

Originally Posted by Aggo

I would agree with you if I didn't think there was a greater than 50% chance of a title no show. That would be 2 in a row. How many more 32 line verses is esso gonna write for no reason. Eventually he gets fed up and stops writing for them as well. How much longer before people stop signing up cuz some "legend" keeps getting bumped ahead of them when they've been putting in work.

He ain't a legendddd he lost to Lockhart in a 32 in 2014. What you think Esso 2018 gonna do to him?

[Subreal]

Originally Posted by Aggo

I would agree with you if I didn't think there was a greater than 50% chance of a title no show. That would be 2 in a row. How many more 32 line verses is esso gonna write for no reason. Eventually he gets fed up and stops writing for them as well. How much longer before people stop signing up cuz some "legend" keeps getting bumped ahead of them when they've been putting in work.

He ain't a legendddd he lost to Lockhart in a 32 in 2014. What you think Esso 2018 gonna do to him?

[RULE]

Originally Posted by DavEtH

I think almost all of these cards lack showcase and matchmaking. It was short lived, but my TRBz thing had a lot of people excited because it wasn't JUST a "league" or whatever.

Because DeNiro won't be around long, there's no point in building a shot. Give him the immediate title shot. Either the narrative of returning hall of famer getting the belt is built, or you give your first champ big name win and a fresh opponent.

In this stuff, matchmaking needs to be engaging. People need to be excited, and battling someone they've faced 20times isn't interesting.

Build rookies and prospects from the bottom against on another. When their record is good, use them to pad a more experienced guy's record and to build them to a title shot. Either use "legends" as automatic title shots, or one off attraction pieces ("freakshow fights") to bring more attention to the cards.

Its the booker in you.


If it wasnt for Rican i would probably of given Milk an automatic title shot.

Im still undecided on the title match, But i'll make the card soon so people can prep before the GC kicks in.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by DavEtH

I think almost all of these cards lack showcase and matchmaking. It was short lived, but my TRBz thing had a lot of people excited because it wasn't JUST a "league" or whatever.

Because DeNiro won't be around long, there's no point in building a shot. Give him the immediate title shot. Either the narrative of returning hall of famer getting the belt is built, or you give your first champ big name win and a fresh opponent.

In this stuff, matchmaking needs to be engaging. People need to be excited, and battling someone they've faced 20times isn't interesting.

Build rookies and prospects from the bottom against on another. When their record is good, use them to pad a more experienced guy's record and to build them to a title shot. Either use "legends" as automatic title shots, or one off attraction pieces ("freakshow fights") to bring more attention to the cards.

Its the booker in you.


If it wasnt for Rican i would probably of given Milk an automatic title shot.

Im still undecided on the title match, But i'll make the card soon so people can prep before the GC kicks in.

[RULE]

Will leave up for 1 more day.

[RULE]

Will leave up for 1 more day.

Sorry I didn't know about the no show last time. Completely agree. I'd maybe even use him in a lower match then. Get something that could be fun as fuck if it goes down, but no one really cares about if it doesnt. DaDDiO Vs DeNiro could be awesome.

---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Subreal

He ain't a legendddd he lost to Lockhart in a 32 in 2014. What you think Esso 2018 gonna do to him?

There's pretty much like 2 people on LB right now that Lockhart didn't beat before 2015.

Sorry I didn't know about the no show last time. Completely agree. I'd maybe even use him in a lower match then. Get something that could be fun as fuck if it goes down, but no one really cares about if it doesnt. DaDDiO Vs DeNiro could be awesome.

---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Subreal

He ain't a legendddd he lost to Lockhart in a 32 in 2014. What you think Esso 2018 gonna do to him?

There's pretty much like 2 people on LB right now that Lockhart didn't beat before 2015.