To Whoever "X" Is, Making A New Rule.

[Mindless]

Originally Posted by pULSe

Student has taken many penises in his butt in 2010.

fix'd







post number

[Mindless]

Originally Posted by pULSe

Student has taken many penises in his butt in 2010.

fix'd







post number

[TheStudent]

Originally Posted by Mindless

Quoted for truth

Yeah I Kinda Set Myself Up For That One.

Originally Posted by pULSe

Student has taken many L's in 2010.

Nah. I Become A Mod In 2010 Lol Great Start, Bad Finish.

Originally Posted by Mindless

fix'd







post number

Uh. I'm Honored I Guess.

[TheStudent]

Originally Posted by Mindless

Quoted for truth

Yeah I Kinda Set Myself Up For That One.

Originally Posted by pULSe

Student has taken many L's in 2010.

Nah. I Become A Mod In 2010 Lol Great Start, Bad Finish.

Originally Posted by Mindless

fix'd







post number

Uh. I'm Honored I Guess.

Btw: to the guy who said ima be congressmen one day.... You're Fecking awesome.

Btw: to the guy who said ima be congressmen one day.... You're Fecking awesome.

[TheStudent]

Dude, Just Because They Don't Control What Other Sites Have Doesn't Mean They Can't Limit You From Posting Links To Them Or Posting Content From Them.
Your Not Even An Exclusive Member, Why The Hell Are You Bitching About This? This Site's Free Unless You Decide On Your Own To Upgrade To An Exclusive Membership So If You Don't Like The Rules Then Fucking Leave Lol Otherwise You Just Look Honestly, Retarded.

[TheStudent]

Dude, Just Because They Don't Control What Other Sites Have Doesn't Mean They Can't Limit You From Posting Links To Them Or Posting Content From Them.
Your Not Even An Exclusive Member, Why The Hell Are You Bitching About This? This Site's Free Unless You Decide On Your Own To Upgrade To An Exclusive Membership So If You Don't Like The Rules Then Fucking Leave Lol Otherwise You Just Look Honestly, Retarded.

"Dude, Just Because They Don't Control What Other Sites Have Doesn't Mean They Can't Limit You From Posting Links To Them.."


Links to Other Websites
This site may include links providing direct access to other Internet sites maintained by third parties.


^ your a fucking idiot. in the terms it CLEARLY SAYS THAT THE LINKS ARE ALLOWED. plz....do us a favor...drink bleach slut.

Ps: im just trolling. i honestly...don't give two shits or fucks about the fb rule, cuz i dont battle here lol. i just wanted to stir sum shit up.

"Dude, Just Because They Don't Control What Other Sites Have Doesn't Mean They Can't Limit You From Posting Links To Them.."


Links to Other Websites
This site may include links providing direct access to other Internet sites maintained by third parties.


^ your a fucking idiot. in the terms it CLEARLY SAYS THAT THE LINKS ARE ALLOWED. plz....do us a favor...drink bleach slut.

Ps: im just trolling. i honestly...don't give two shits or fucks about the fb rule, cuz i dont battle here lol. i just wanted to stir sum shit up.

[Mindless]

Even if your post "dissecting" mine were right, which it's not, you're still missing that this site is the equivalent of private property and as such we may dictate what speech is allowed on our property. The same way that if somebody came into your house and demanded that you listen to their spiel about how their religion/political view is better you can tell them to fuck right the hell off.

Which is what I'm telling you. Either abide by our rules or fuck off.



"Links to Other Websites
This site may include links providing direct access to other Internet sites maintained by third parties."

Also, that reference corresponds to the site's placement of links to outside sources like advertisers. Not content posted by the users.

[Mindless]

Even if your post "dissecting" mine were right, which it's not, you're still missing that this site is the equivalent of private property and as such we may dictate what speech is allowed on our property. The same way that if somebody came into your house and demanded that you listen to their spiel about how their religion/political view is better you can tell them to fuck right the hell off.

Which is what I'm telling you. Either abide by our rules or fuck off.



"Links to Other Websites
This site may include links providing direct access to other Internet sites maintained by third parties."

Also, that reference corresponds to the site's placement of links to outside sources like advertisers. Not content posted by the users.

Originally Posted by Mindless

Even if your post "dissecting" mine were right, which it's not, you're still missing that this site is the equivalent of private property and as such we may dictate what speech is allowed on our property..

"Letsbeef" is a private site "OPEN TO THE PUBLIC"... Just Like...A Mall Is Private Property..but It's Open To The Public As Well.. Therefore Since it's Open To The Public, Is Liable For Constitutional Rights.


"In the 1940s, the Supreme Court took on the issue of "companytowns" with regard to the First Amendment. Although the company townwas private property owned by the company, the fact that it had beenopened up to use by the public generally made it subject to theconstitutional requirements of the First Amendment. Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946)."


http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-gui...ivate-property


"..the court determined that the open and public areas of the mall effectively functioned as a public place, thus allowing the distribution of political pamphlets and the solicitation of signatures..(Aka Freedom Of Expression)"


Court Order Reference's:



Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. Logan Valley Plaza (1968)

Marsh v. Alabama (1946)

Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner (1972)

State v. Schmid (1980)

City of Jamestown v. Beneda

Kings Mall v. Wenk

State of Florida v. Wood (2004)

Wall-Mart V. Crayton (2006)





^ lrn2law faggator.




btw: to the guy who said this...


"The subject of defamation, within the bounds of United States and Canadian law is entirely placed at the feet of LB administration. The stipulative nature of this is reserved within the rights of the site administration to change or modify the rules at any given time."


^ while that is true.. you also have to remember that Freedom Of Speech / Expression IS within the bounds of United States And Canadian Law. so attempting to change and govern what you can and cant say isn't constitutional.

Originally Posted by Mindless

Even if your post "dissecting" mine were right, which it's not, you're still missing that this site is the equivalent of private property and as such we may dictate what speech is allowed on our property..

"Letsbeef" is a private site "OPEN TO THE PUBLIC"... Just Like...A Mall Is Private Property..but It's Open To The Public As Well.. Therefore Since it's Open To The Public, Is Liable For Constitutional Rights.


"In the 1940s, the Supreme Court took on the issue of "companytowns" with regard to the First Amendment. Although the company townwas private property owned by the company, the fact that it had beenopened up to use by the public generally made it subject to theconstitutional requirements of the First Amendment. Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946)."


http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-gui...ivate-property


"..the court determined that the open and public areas of the mall effectively functioned as a public place, thus allowing the distribution of political pamphlets and the solicitation of signatures..(Aka Freedom Of Expression)"


Court Order Reference's:



Amalgamated Food Employees Union v. Logan Valley Plaza (1968)

Marsh v. Alabama (1946)

Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner (1972)

State v. Schmid (1980)

City of Jamestown v. Beneda

Kings Mall v. Wenk

State of Florida v. Wood (2004)

Wall-Mart V. Crayton (2006)





^ lrn2law faggator.




btw: to the guy who said this...


"The subject of defamation, within the bounds of United States and Canadian law is entirely placed at the feet of LB administration. The stipulative nature of this is reserved within the rights of the site administration to change or modify the rules at any given time."


^ while that is true.. you also have to remember that Freedom Of Speech / Expression IS within the bounds of United States And Canadian Law. so attempting to change and govern what you can and cant say isn't constitutional.

[Mindless]

Originally Posted by Skizzo

Hurp durp I still don't understand that the first amendment only applies to government and not private business plus I think that LetsBeef is a mall.

HA HA HA HA No.

LetsBeef is a privately owned and operated business and as such has the right to determine what is and is not appropriate speech within its confines. The TOS allows us to remove any content we see objectionable. If you don't think we can then go post some porn on YouTube and come back and tell me what happens.


http://www.debate.org/debates/Profes...rking-sites/1/

http://www.broowaha.com/articles/7944/freedom-of-speech

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...3080628AAflikd

http://www.findlegaladvice.org/forum...ube-634567.htm

http://www.theadminzone.com/forums/a...rticle&aid=845

[Mindless]

Originally Posted by Skizzo

Hurp durp I still don't understand that the first amendment only applies to government and not private business plus I think that LetsBeef is a mall.

HA HA HA HA No.

LetsBeef is a privately owned and operated business and as such has the right to determine what is and is not appropriate speech within its confines. The TOS allows us to remove any content we see objectionable. If you don't think we can then go post some porn on YouTube and come back and tell me what happens.


http://www.debate.org/debates/Profes...rking-sites/1/

http://www.broowaha.com/articles/7944/freedom-of-speech

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...3080628AAflikd

http://www.findlegaladvice.org/forum...ube-634567.htm

http://www.theadminzone.com/forums/a...rticle&aid=845

[DESSA]

Originally Posted by Mindless

HA HA HA HA No.

LetsBeef is a privately owned and operated business and as such has the right to determine what is and is not appropriate speech within its confines. The TOS allows us to remove any content we see objectionable. If you don't think we can then go post some porn on YouTube and come back and tell me what happens.


http://www.debate.org/debates/Profes...rking-sites/1/

http://www.broowaha.com/articles/7944/freedom-of-speech

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...3080628AAflikd

http://www.findlegaladvice.org/forum...ube-634567.htm

http://www.theadminzone.com/forums/a...rticle&aid=845

I like that u handle yo Job.

[DESSA]

Originally Posted by Mindless

HA HA HA HA No.

LetsBeef is a privately owned and operated business and as such has the right to determine what is and is not appropriate speech within its confines. The TOS allows us to remove any content we see objectionable. If you don't think we can then go post some porn on YouTube and come back and tell me what happens.


http://www.debate.org/debates/Profes...rking-sites/1/

http://www.broowaha.com/articles/7944/freedom-of-speech

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...3080628AAflikd

http://www.findlegaladvice.org/forum...ube-634567.htm

http://www.theadminzone.com/forums/a...rticle&aid=845

I like that u handle yo Job.

Originally Posted by Mindless

HA HA HA HA No.

Letsbeef is my private, and by exposing my vajay jay's with facebook links you're going against womens rights.

Well If That's How You feel, I Guess I Cant Say Your Wrong There Lol.


"If you don't think we can then go post some porn on YouTube and come back and tell me what happens."


Ok...Your Taking Extremes Now. Porn And Facebook Links Are two WAYY Different Things. This Is The Issue Of One Crybaby Ass Nigga Who Got Exposed with one link... And Your Attempting To Make It InTo "Go On Youtube Flashing Your PeePee Stick And try To Tell Them About Freedom Of Expression." Cmon Kid....Be Realistic.


thats like saying... "i have freedom of speech, im going to phone my homie and tell him how ima bomb the senator tomorrow at 6 O'Clock"

^ obviously... taking it to extremes makes it an entirely different situation.



"The TOS allows us to remove any content we see objectionable."

The T.O.S / Terms Of Service or "Privacy Policy", I Have Thus Far ALREADY Counter'd that argument, proving you wrong lol. Although Removing The Links Or Information Is Solely Up To Whoever Runs The Site, In your Own Terms and conditions there IS NO RULE AGAINST IT, Nay.. Its The OPPOSITE. Your Own Terms Of Service State That The Links ARE in Fact allowed And Warns Users Of the Potential Risk That They may Be Posted + accepting no responsibility for them. so now your becoming repetitive & dodging my recent claims to explain your lack of consistency with those rules.




Before My trolling goes any further i jus wana say.........



wow. its gone a whole 8 pages of me pulling rabbit shit out of a hat, talking mess that i no nothing about... talking shit to mods and admins... owning random cheerleaders that jump into conversations......


and im still not banned..... thats fecking awesome btw.



Ok .... Continue The Trollage.

Originally Posted by Mindless

HA HA HA HA No.

Letsbeef is my private, and by exposing my vajay jay's with facebook links you're going against womens rights.

Well If That's How You feel, I Guess I Cant Say Your Wrong There Lol.


"If you don't think we can then go post some porn on YouTube and come back and tell me what happens."


Ok...Your Taking Extremes Now. Porn And Facebook Links Are two WAYY Different Things. This Is The Issue Of One Crybaby Ass Nigga Who Got Exposed with one link... And Your Attempting To Make It InTo "Go On Youtube Flashing Your PeePee Stick And try To Tell Them About Freedom Of Expression." Cmon Kid....Be Realistic.


thats like saying... "i have freedom of speech, im going to phone my homie and tell him how ima bomb the senator tomorrow at 6 O'Clock"

^ obviously... taking it to extremes makes it an entirely different situation.



"The TOS allows us to remove any content we see objectionable."

The T.O.S / Terms Of Service or "Privacy Policy", I Have Thus Far ALREADY Counter'd that argument, proving you wrong lol. Although Removing The Links Or Information Is Solely Up To Whoever Runs The Site, In your Own Terms and conditions there IS NO RULE AGAINST IT, Nay.. Its The OPPOSITE. Your Own Terms Of Service State That The Links ARE in Fact allowed And Warns Users Of the Potential Risk That They may Be Posted + accepting no responsibility for them. so now your becoming repetitive & dodging my recent claims to explain your lack of consistency with those rules.




Before My trolling goes any further i jus wana say.........



wow. its gone a whole 8 pages of me pulling rabbit shit out of a hat, talking mess that i no nothing about... talking shit to mods and admins... owning random cheerleaders that jump into conversations......


and im still not banned..... thats fecking awesome btw.



Ok .... Continue The Trollage.