TRBz 2: Fallout

^Next time, next time .

I can't decide whether or not to allow Ws for no shows or not.

^Next time, next time .

I can't decide whether or not to allow Ws for no shows or not.

[Subreal]

Originally Posted by Dave

^Next time, next time .

I can't decide whether or not to allow Ws for no shows or not.

If you put someone in the card, and their opponent no shows, and if u don't give them a win, that delays their rising up in the card. Not their fault their opponent no-showed imo, they shouldn't be punished by acting like they never signed up, because then it takes longer for them to climb the card if their opponents keep no-showing

[Subreal]

Originally Posted by Dave

^Next time, next time .

I can't decide whether or not to allow Ws for no shows or not.

If you put someone in the card, and their opponent no shows, and if u don't give them a win, that delays their rising up in the card. Not their fault their opponent no-showed imo, they shouldn't be punished by acting like they never signed up, because then it takes longer for them to climb the card if their opponents keep no-showing

[ELOH STACKz]

I agree with @Subreal... I had half a verse ready for Jack, not my fault he no-showed @Dave... However, I have a suggestion. If there are an even amount if No-Shows, you can match up the battlers & give them a day or two to prepare a verse for the other dude.

That way, everybody on the card gets a battle. If it takes longer, so what. Atleast it cuts down on the No-Show rates. Just a thought

---------- Post added at 04:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:03 PM ----------

For example, take me & @Dysfuntional... Our opponents no-Showed. You can put us up against eachother & that'll take the place of our original matches (that aren't taking place anymore)... I dunno if that fucks up the whole flow of the tourbey or not, u can be the judge of that...

[ELOH STACKz]

I agree with @Subreal... I had half a verse ready for Jack, not my fault he no-showed @Dave... However, I have a suggestion. If there are an even amount if No-Shows, you can match up the battlers & give them a day or two to prepare a verse for the other dude.

That way, everybody on the card gets a battle. If it takes longer, so what. Atleast it cuts down on the No-Show rates. Just a thought

---------- Post added at 04:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:03 PM ----------

For example, take me & @Dysfuntional... Our opponents no-Showed. You can put us up against eachother & that'll take the place of our original matches (that aren't taking place anymore)... I dunno if that fucks up the whole flow of the tourbey or not, u can be the judge of that...

@Subreal, exactly what made me think of it. If that's the case, Fidel Z will have another W on his record. I might just give them the win, but I'll not use it in my decision making when moving people towards title shots.

@Subreal, exactly what made me think of it. If that's the case, Fidel Z will have another W on his record. I might just give them the win, but I'll not use it in my decision making when moving people towards title shots.

[Wonderbred]

@Dave, the battle's live.

http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...491&section=tb

[Wonderbred]

@Dave, the battle's live.

http://www.letsbeef.com/battle_detai...491&section=tb

@Dean I swear if your faggot ass no-show me

@Dean I swear if your faggot ass no-show me

[Obey]

Still waiting on Ascension..

[Obey]

Still waiting on Ascension..

LOL If agonize no shows Im retiring

LOL If agonize no shows Im retiring

[Phe]

Uh ooh its about that time for David..

[Phe]

Uh ooh its about that time for David..

I was told my internet would be fixed in 24 hours. I would have no showed had that been the case. I made this picture in fear.



Battle will be up in 2 mins.

I was told my internet would be fixed in 24 hours. I would have no showed had that been the case. I made this picture in fear.



Battle will be up in 2 mins.