Heaven....nah yo

[Krhyme Killz]

word...everyone go peep pULSe's thread about a video game....

---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

H



What about how shit was before shit is?

back then shit was how it was before this...things are just in a state of being..

[Krhyme Killz]

word...everyone go peep pULSe's thread about a video game....

---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

H



What about how shit was before shit is?

back then shit was how it was before this...things are just in a state of being..

@Obey there are several accounts of earth like planets billions of light years away from us, which, in theory, are capable of supporting life. The universe is infinitely expanding at exponential rates, and has been for billions and billions of years. To assume that no other planet can support life, only because we have not observed such a planet is ignorant.

@Obey there are several accounts of earth like planets billions of light years away from us, which, in theory, are capable of supporting life. The universe is infinitely expanding at exponential rates, and has been for billions and billions of years. To assume that no other planet can support life, only because we have not observed such a planet is ignorant.

[Godbody]

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

[Godbody]

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

[Krhyme Killz]

Originally Posted by Godbody

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

why does not knowing exactly how space was created equate to the requirement of a creator?

[Krhyme Killz]

Originally Posted by Godbody

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

why does not knowing exactly how space was created equate to the requirement of a creator?

Originally Posted by Godbody

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

Because science has yet to answer your questions, it cannot answer your questions?

Originally Posted by Godbody

There could be tons of planets with beings living on them, you're stupid as fuck if you don't think so

The Pope himself acknowledges UFO's, which in a sense trumps the Bible.

The Pope is also reforming the church to accept homosexuality. Again, trumping his own religious book. This of course only applies if you're Catholic. Since Christians don't have a Pope.

We can't reach a lot of these planets but we can pick up images from telescopes and advanced technology that can.

& There is a creator because science itself is created. That's why EVERY scientist has to come to a dead end. They rack their brains with "this created this, so we gotta found out what created that"

Eventually they get stumped and realize divine intervention took place because for space to exist there had to be a creator. Whether you want to personify that creator (which I dont) is up to you. But to say there isn't a creator is extremely foolish. If there wasn't a creator we'd have all the answers we need through science. Science cannot answer everything

Because science has yet to answer your questions, it cannot answer your questions?

[Obey]

IMO, Science will never-ever be able to determine whether the Earth was created/naturally unfolded. I know your stance on religion @BLNK/@Godbody is it's to control the masses, correct? But what makes it so hard for me to understand is why would they make-up the Bible? So long ago.. Why would they take time to write all that shit with their fucking dipping-ink (probably developed the worst arthritis ever lmao.) Just to tell a fake story? There's something missing.. I feel like it's in front of us, but we can't grasp it. Idk it's weird to me, but this thread is interesting. I'm learning a lot.

[Obey]

IMO, Science will never-ever be able to determine whether the Earth was created/naturally unfolded. I know your stance on religion @BLNK/@Godbody is it's to control the masses, correct? But what makes it so hard for me to understand is why would they make-up the Bible? So long ago.. Why would they take time to write all that shit with their fucking dipping-ink (probably developed the worst arthritis ever lmao.) Just to tell a fake story? There's something missing.. I feel like it's in front of us, but we can't grasp it. Idk it's weird to me, but this thread is interesting. I'm learning a lot.

Originally Posted by Obey

IMO, Science will never-ever be able to determine whether the Earth was created/naturally unfolded. I know your stance on religion @BLNK/@Godbody is it's to control the masses, correct? But what makes it so hard for me to understand is why would they make-up the Bible? So long ago.. Why would they take time to write all that shit with their fucking dipping-ink (probably developed the worst arthritis ever lmao.) Just to tell a fake story? There's something missing.. I feel like it's in front of us, but we can't grasp it. Idk it's weird to me, but this thread is interesting. I'm learning a lot.

@Obey, the bible was nothing but a collective work of literary fiction. It was written for the same reason that authors(s/o @RULE) spend countless hours writing to this day. For the interest, and entertainment of a societal structure. Also, it is not the place of religion to control the masses, it is the place of the church to control the masses through an irrational belief in a religious system. The church SPECIFICALLY chose the stories included in the bible by hand.

Originally Posted by Obey

IMO, Science will never-ever be able to determine whether the Earth was created/naturally unfolded. I know your stance on religion @BLNK/@Godbody is it's to control the masses, correct? But what makes it so hard for me to understand is why would they make-up the Bible? So long ago.. Why would they take time to write all that shit with their fucking dipping-ink (probably developed the worst arthritis ever lmao.) Just to tell a fake story? There's something missing.. I feel like it's in front of us, but we can't grasp it. Idk it's weird to me, but this thread is interesting. I'm learning a lot.

@Obey, the bible was nothing but a collective work of literary fiction. It was written for the same reason that authors(s/o @RULE) spend countless hours writing to this day. For the interest, and entertainment of a societal structure. Also, it is not the place of religion to control the masses, it is the place of the church to control the masses through an irrational belief in a religious system. The church SPECIFICALLY chose the stories included in the bible by hand.

[Obey]

Originally Posted by BLNK

@Obey, the bible was nothing but a collective work of literary fiction. It was written for the same reason that authors(s/o @RULE) spend countless hours writing to this day. For the interest, and entertainment of a societal structure. Also, it is not the place of religion to control the masses, it is the place of the church to control the masses through an irrational belief in a religious system. The church SPECIFICALLY chose the stories included in the bible by hand.

But there's different accounts of the Bible from different times, almost the same thing.

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Agonize

But what isn't hard for me to believe is that if you think about the almost infinite expanse of the universe, there was one instance (and I guarantee more) where that happened by chance. I've flipped a lot of coins, never has one landed on its edge, but if I flipped coins everyday for 100 years, eventually it would probably happen.

Yeah, but.. how many explosions to create the universe can their be lol?

[Obey]

Originally Posted by BLNK

@Obey, the bible was nothing but a collective work of literary fiction. It was written for the same reason that authors(s/o @RULE) spend countless hours writing to this day. For the interest, and entertainment of a societal structure. Also, it is not the place of religion to control the masses, it is the place of the church to control the masses through an irrational belief in a religious system. The church SPECIFICALLY chose the stories included in the bible by hand.

But there's different accounts of the Bible from different times, almost the same thing.

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Agonize

But what isn't hard for me to believe is that if you think about the almost infinite expanse of the universe, there was one instance (and I guarantee more) where that happened by chance. I've flipped a lot of coins, never has one landed on its edge, but if I flipped coins everyday for 100 years, eventually it would probably happen.

Yeah, but.. how many explosions to create the universe can their be lol?

Originally Posted by Obey

But there's different accounts of the Bible from different times, almost the same thing.

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------



Yeah, but.. how many explosions to create the universe can their be lol?

So, someone read someone else's work, and incorporated it into their own? Haven't you seen the Sherlock adaptations. Different times, same generically based story.

---------- Post added at 03:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:27 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

lol I haven't made an argument

Reread everything I've wrote

Let's list a few "things" a dog, for instance, is a thing. Is a dog capable of creating? A tree is a thing. Is a tree capable of creating? The act of creating in itself, inherently implies an anthropomorphism, as previously stated.

---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:29 PM ----------

Also, as a side note, @Obey, the earth's formation has been answered by science.

Originally Posted by Obey

But there's different accounts of the Bible from different times, almost the same thing.

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:24 PM ----------



Yeah, but.. how many explosions to create the universe can their be lol?

So, someone read someone else's work, and incorporated it into their own? Haven't you seen the Sherlock adaptations. Different times, same generically based story.

---------- Post added at 03:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:27 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

lol I haven't made an argument

Reread everything I've wrote

Let's list a few "things" a dog, for instance, is a thing. Is a dog capable of creating? A tree is a thing. Is a tree capable of creating? The act of creating in itself, inherently implies an anthropomorphism, as previously stated.

---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:29 PM ----------

Also, as a side note, @Obey, the earth's formation has been answered by science.

[Spooky Deep]

Originally Posted by BLNK

Let's list a few "things" a dog, for instance, is a thing. Is a dog capable of creating? A tree is a thing. Is a tree capable of creating? The act of creating in itself, inherently implies an anthropomorphism, as previously stated.

You haven't proved the act or creating implies an anthropomorphism.

A 6 year old kid could make you look silly saying...

A bird builds a nest
Bees build honeycombs

lol

[Spooky Deep]

Originally Posted by BLNK

Let's list a few "things" a dog, for instance, is a thing. Is a dog capable of creating? A tree is a thing. Is a tree capable of creating? The act of creating in itself, inherently implies an anthropomorphism, as previously stated.

You haven't proved the act or creating implies an anthropomorphism.

A 6 year old kid could make you look silly saying...

A bird builds a nest
Bees build honeycombs

lol