Votng is ass on here

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

I feel this conversation always turns into a “so and so got robbed” conversation. Nothing usually comes of this. If you want to have an ACTUAL conversation about lack voting we can.

If anything I think the FVC needs a revamp. Maybe a notification system for members instead of tagging folks and hoping the notice in time. Anything really.

The FVC is just a group of people who vote a little bit more than the average member with longer expos. That don't make them any better of a voter. FVC needs to be gone and stay gone. If I wanted a good vote that completely shits on the entire Fair Voters Club, I'd ask guys like @Manhattan or @EtH.

Honestly hate that people keep pushing this idea for revamps when nothing about it makes any sense.

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

I feel this conversation always turns into a “so and so got robbed” conversation. Nothing usually comes of this. If you want to have an ACTUAL conversation about lack voting we can.

If anything I think the FVC needs a revamp. Maybe a notification system for members instead of tagging folks and hoping the notice in time. Anything really.

The FVC is just a group of people who vote a little bit more than the average member with longer expos. That don't make them any better of a voter. FVC needs to be gone and stay gone. If I wanted a good vote that completely shits on the entire Fair Voters Club, I'd ask guys like @Manhattan or @EtH.

Honestly hate that people keep pushing this idea for revamps when nothing about it makes any sense.

[GOOD GRIEF]

Originally Posted by Punk

The FVC is just a group of people who vote a little bit more than the average member with longer expos. That don't make them any better of a voter. FVC needs to be gone and stay gone. If I wanted a good vote that completely shits on the entire Fair Voters Club, I'd ask guys like @Manhattan or @EtH.

Honestly hate that people keep pushing this idea for revamps when nothing about it makes any sense.

This answer provides nothing. Your basically saying “everyone should like... vote more you guys”. They should but what’s the solution?

[GOOD GRIEF]

Originally Posted by Punk

The FVC is just a group of people who vote a little bit more than the average member with longer expos. That don't make them any better of a voter. FVC needs to be gone and stay gone. If I wanted a good vote that completely shits on the entire Fair Voters Club, I'd ask guys like @Manhattan or @EtH.

Honestly hate that people keep pushing this idea for revamps when nothing about it makes any sense.

This answer provides nothing. Your basically saying “everyone should like... vote more you guys”. They should but what’s the solution?

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

This answer provides nothing. Your basically saying “everyone should like... vote more you guys”. They should but what’s the solution?

Please explain exactly what the Fair Voters Club does and while you're doing that, explain why their voting power should count more than mine

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

This answer provides nothing. Your basically saying “everyone should like... vote more you guys”. They should but what’s the solution?

Please explain exactly what the Fair Voters Club does and while you're doing that, explain why their voting power should count more than mine

[GOOD GRIEF]

Originally Posted by Punk

Please explain exactly what the Fair Voters Club does and while you're doing that, explain why their voting power should count more than mine

The idea behind the FVC is a group of people approved at least by mods who have a great sense of voting. They help slept on battles and They also can aid in balancing out say... a battle you might be in where 2 uneducated voters voted against you. That’s why they’re VP is higher. Why yours is lower... take it up with the mods. Lol

What would you do to FIX this situation my man? I don’t mind if you disagree with me but just pointing out the problem repeatedly won’t do anything

[GOOD GRIEF]

Originally Posted by Punk

Please explain exactly what the Fair Voters Club does and while you're doing that, explain why their voting power should count more than mine

The idea behind the FVC is a group of people approved at least by mods who have a great sense of voting. They help slept on battles and They also can aid in balancing out say... a battle you might be in where 2 uneducated voters voted against you. That’s why they’re VP is higher. Why yours is lower... take it up with the mods. Lol

What would you do to FIX this situation my man? I don’t mind if you disagree with me but just pointing out the problem repeatedly won’t do anything

[Brayne Ded]

I think he picked the potential candidates and then we, as a site, voted.

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169060

[Brayne Ded]

I think he picked the potential candidates and then we, as a site, voted.

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169060

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by Brayne Ded

I think he picked the potential candidates and then we, as a site, voted.

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169060

Ah ok well I stand corrected for #2

Haha but everything else I typed, eat it up!

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by Brayne Ded

I think he picked the potential candidates and then we, as a site, voted.

https://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=169060

Ah ok well I stand corrected for #2

Haha but everything else I typed, eat it up!

[Brayne Ded]

Originally Posted by Punk

Ah ok well I stand corrected for #2

Haha but everything else I typed, eat it up!

Not trying to argue with you, Clippy. Just figured I'd clear that one thing up.

In my opinion, voting is what it is. It will never work as everyone thinks it should work differently. I just accepted it for what it is. Sometimes you get good votes and sometimes you get shafted. That's just LB. Anyways, back to minding my own business.

[Brayne Ded]

Originally Posted by Punk

Ah ok well I stand corrected for #2

Haha but everything else I typed, eat it up!

Not trying to argue with you, Clippy. Just figured I'd clear that one thing up.

In my opinion, voting is what it is. It will never work as everyone thinks it should work differently. I just accepted it for what it is. Sometimes you get good votes and sometimes you get shafted. That's just LB. Anyways, back to minding my own business.

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by Brayne Ded

Not trying to argue with you, Clippy. Just figured I'd clear that one thing up.

In my opinion, voting is what it is. It will never work as everyone thinks it should work differently. I just accepted it for what it is. Sometimes you get good votes and sometimes you get shafted. That's just LB. Anyways, back to minding my own business.

Nah I agree homie g.

Bad voting is something we cant fix, we can only maintain.

[Rowdy]

Originally Posted by Brayne Ded

Not trying to argue with you, Clippy. Just figured I'd clear that one thing up.

In my opinion, voting is what it is. It will never work as everyone thinks it should work differently. I just accepted it for what it is. Sometimes you get good votes and sometimes you get shafted. That's just LB. Anyways, back to minding my own business.

Nah I agree homie g.

Bad voting is something we cant fix, we can only maintain.

It’s funny how OP’s like “y’all vote too low on ratings” but I see one of his battles has “TESTICLE COUCH SNIFF” as the opening multi.

I’m not rating a verse with TESTICLE COUCH SNIFF at a 7 or above. Sorry. Not happening.

It’s funny how OP’s like “y’all vote too low on ratings” but I see one of his battles has “TESTICLE COUCH SNIFF” as the opening multi.

I’m not rating a verse with TESTICLE COUCH SNIFF at a 7 or above. Sorry. Not happening.

[Brayne Ded]

If I had it my way, voting would be simplified. There wouldn't be ratings. There wouldn't be a single "who won." There would be some boxes to check. Maybe 5? One for multis/rhyming, one for punchlines, one for wordplay, one for entertainment and one for flow. You check the box for the battler you think did better on that particular criteria. When you're done, that decides your vote. No expos on votes, no ratings and a crystal clear reason why someone beat you. If everyone votes the other guy better on wordplay, you'd know to work on wordplay. Just a dumb idea that will never be implemented but there it is.

[Brayne Ded]

If I had it my way, voting would be simplified. There wouldn't be ratings. There wouldn't be a single "who won." There would be some boxes to check. Maybe 5? One for multis/rhyming, one for punchlines, one for wordplay, one for entertainment and one for flow. You check the box for the battler you think did better on that particular criteria. When you're done, that decides your vote. No expos on votes, no ratings and a crystal clear reason why someone beat you. If everyone votes the other guy better on wordplay, you'd know to work on wordplay. Just a dumb idea that will never be implemented but there it is.