EtH Banned.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Agonize

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

I cannot remember a single instance of that rule being used tbh.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Agonize

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

I cannot remember a single instance of that rule being used tbh.

Thanks to all of the non-staff members who voted on a staff only poll.

I appreciate your eagerness to voice your opinion, however idiotic it may be.

Thanks to all of the non-staff members who voted on a staff only poll.

I appreciate your eagerness to voice your opinion, however idiotic it may be.

Originally Posted by Agonize

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

Agreeed.

Originally Posted by Agonize

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

Agreeed.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Agonize

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

But I've never banned anyone for disrespecting me, I've never enforced that rule so you can stop that hypocrite bulshit right now. I know I'm an obnoxious faggot but I can take whats dished out in return so fall the fuck back with that shit.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Agonize

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

But I've never banned anyone for disrespecting me, I've never enforced that rule so you can stop that hypocrite bulshit right now. I know I'm an obnoxious faggot but I can take whats dished out in return so fall the fuck back with that shit.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

He didn't disrespect anyone he gave his opinion on the current staff. I've done exactly the same in this thread and I'm sure dozens of other people have done in separate threads and yet we remain unbanned. It's always to fit the agenda.

He went around slandering staff. Thats disrespect. Look I don't give a flying fuck what he says but if were gonna be technical about it. which you are. Rule was right to ban him. If you have a problem with the rules in place you're talking to the wrong people. We didn't make them.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

He didn't disrespect anyone he gave his opinion on the current staff. I've done exactly the same in this thread and I'm sure dozens of other people have done in separate threads and yet we remain unbanned. It's always to fit the agenda.

He went around slandering staff. Thats disrespect. Look I don't give a flying fuck what he says but if were gonna be technical about it. which you are. Rule was right to ban him. If you have a problem with the rules in place you're talking to the wrong people. We didn't make them.

Originally Posted by Just C

But I've never banned anyone for disrespecting me, I've never enforced that rule so you can stop that hypocrite bulshit right now. I know I'm an obnoxious faggot but I can take whats dished out in return so fall the fuck back with that shit.

But you were defending the rule and saying RULE was right for enforcing it. But RULE says that that isn't the case. What is the case, im confused by the difference of opinions being presented.

Originally Posted by Just C

But I've never banned anyone for disrespecting me, I've never enforced that rule so you can stop that hypocrite bulshit right now. I know I'm an obnoxious faggot but I can take whats dished out in return so fall the fuck back with that shit.

But you were defending the rule and saying RULE was right for enforcing it. But RULE says that that isn't the case. What is the case, im confused by the difference of opinions being presented.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Fidel Z

Agreeed.

and you can stfu to you weasily little leech.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Fidel Z

Agreeed.

and you can stfu to you weasily little leech.

Originally Posted by RULE

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

"EtH's perma-ban status has been reinforced by me due to his constant lies about the actions of the sites staff" - Rule

No Rule, I can read and I can read critically and that's the problem. People don't tend to like criticism and there lies the source of your disappointment.

Originally Posted by RULE

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

"EtH's perma-ban status has been reinforced by me due to his constant lies about the actions of the sites staff" - Rule

No Rule, I can read and I can read critically and that's the problem. People don't tend to like criticism and there lies the source of your disappointment.

Originally Posted by Just C

He went around slandering staff. Thats disrespect. Look I don't give a flying fuck what he says but if were gonna be technical about it. which you are. Rule was right to ban him. If you have a problem with the rules in place you're talking to the wrong people. We didn't make them.

So you do support the rule that you admit was blatent faggotry?

Originally Posted by Just C

He went around slandering staff. Thats disrespect. Look I don't give a flying fuck what he says but if were gonna be technical about it. which you are. Rule was right to ban him. If you have a problem with the rules in place you're talking to the wrong people. We didn't make them.

So you do support the rule that you admit was blatent faggotry?

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Agonize

But you were defending the rule and saying RULE was right for enforcing it. But RULE says that that isn't the case. What is the case, im confused by the difference of opinions being presented.

I'm not saying whether he was right or wrong morrally.

But Eth was slandering staff
Thats a form of disrespecting staff.
Thats a bannable offence

So technically/ethically he was right. banned by the rules.

[J u s T C]

Originally Posted by Agonize

But you were defending the rule and saying RULE was right for enforcing it. But RULE says that that isn't the case. What is the case, im confused by the difference of opinions being presented.

I'm not saying whether he was right or wrong morrally.

But Eth was slandering staff
Thats a form of disrespecting staff.
Thats a bannable offence

So technically/ethically he was right. banned by the rules.