EtH Banned.

Originally Posted by Just C

you don't know anything and you've just admited you're talking out of your ass.

Shall we continue?

Misinformation at work, I've never said that. You have put something into my words which isn't there.

Originally Posted by Just C

you don't know anything and you've just admited you're talking out of your ass.

Shall we continue?

Misinformation at work, I've never said that. You have put something into my words which isn't there.

[J u s T C]

You said misinformation. You do know the meaning of that word?

doesn't matter if it's at work or complete you have nothing to reference my "workings" too.

Shall we continue?

[J u s T C]

You said misinformation. You do know the meaning of that word?

doesn't matter if it's at work or complete you have nothing to reference my "workings" too.

Shall we continue?

[The Ghost of Freak]

Originally Posted by UhMAZING

I forgot who you are?...who are you again?.....
Oh yeah, the one with an incredibly shitty negative record talking about how he's going to "Murder" someone with bars. Smh.

Hilarious… find a quote and post it where I ever said seriously that I would "Murder" someone with bars….

get outta here with your funny self.

Last time I checked you were the horror core rapper monster character…. lmao.

[The Ghost of Freak]

Originally Posted by UhMAZING

I forgot who you are?...who are you again?.....
Oh yeah, the one with an incredibly shitty negative record talking about how he's going to "Murder" someone with bars. Smh.

Hilarious… find a quote and post it where I ever said seriously that I would "Murder" someone with bars….

get outta here with your funny self.

Last time I checked you were the horror core rapper monster character…. lmao.

[J u s T C]

"it's the best I can put together with the misinformation and secretive nature of the small group of moderators that have been involved in this stupidity."

[J u s T C]

"it's the best I can put together with the misinformation and secretive nature of the small group of moderators that have been involved in this stupidity."

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Jason

I dont know everything about this situation with Eth so I cant give my opinion on whether or not he should have been banned but I will say this ..
If i ever owned a website the first and probably only guy id give the red name to is RULE, hes about as fair as impartial as they come
if your theory is that RULE banned Eth cus of some personal vendetta that can be debunked by the fact that he chose to let Eth back on here even when he didnt have to.
the reality is that none of you including myself could even do half as good a job as him. He made a judgment call and thats what he felt was best for the site.
all your mods are corrupt blah blah talk is tiring and played out. why would he ban Eth for no reason? its totally against RULE's character to do that and you all know it
people just like to fight for the sake of fighting

Im not the type to use a sig with quotes in it, but if i was... lol.

Appreciate it Jase.

1/

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Jason

I dont know everything about this situation with Eth so I cant give my opinion on whether or not he should have been banned but I will say this ..
If i ever owned a website the first and probably only guy id give the red name to is RULE, hes about as fair as impartial as they come
if your theory is that RULE banned Eth cus of some personal vendetta that can be debunked by the fact that he chose to let Eth back on here even when he didnt have to.
the reality is that none of you including myself could even do half as good a job as him. He made a judgment call and thats what he felt was best for the site.
all your mods are corrupt blah blah talk is tiring and played out. why would he ban Eth for no reason? its totally against RULE's character to do that and you all know it
people just like to fight for the sake of fighting

Im not the type to use a sig with quotes in it, but if i was... lol.

Appreciate it Jase.

1/

Originally Posted by RULE

@Nicholas, try giving this thread a read.

http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136719

1/

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

Originally Posted by RULE

@Nicholas, try giving this thread a read.

http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136719

1/

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

[J u s T C]

Actually disrespecting staff is a rule.

What now you're gonna 180 and complain that this is a stupid rule rather than accept that it is a rule and Rule was within his rights to enforce that rule?

[J u s T C]

Actually disrespecting staff is a rule.

What now you're gonna 180 and complain that this is a stupid rule rather than accept that it is a rule and Rule was within his rights to enforce that rule?

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

That is a stupid fucking rule. Especially coming from a mod such as yourself who disrespects the shit out of people on the reg. That rule reeks of faggotry.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

Originally Posted by Just C

Actually disrespecting staff is a rule.

What now you're gonna 180 and complain that this is a stupid rule rather than accept that it is a rule and Rule was within his rights to enforce that rule?

He didn't disrespect anyone he gave his opinion on the current staff. I've done exactly the same in this thread and I'm sure dozens of other people have done in separate threads and yet we remain unbanned. It's always to fit the agenda.

Originally Posted by Just C

Actually disrespecting staff is a rule.

What now you're gonna 180 and complain that this is a stupid rule rather than accept that it is a rule and Rule was within his rights to enforce that rule?

He didn't disrespect anyone he gave his opinion on the current staff. I've done exactly the same in this thread and I'm sure dozens of other people have done in separate threads and yet we remain unbanned. It's always to fit the agenda.