EtH Banned.

[The Ghost of Freak]

Originally Posted by UhMAZING

I forgot who you are?...who are you again?.....
Oh yeah, the one with an incredibly shitty negative record talking about how he's going to "Murder" someone with bars. Smh.

Hilarious… find a quote and post it where I ever said seriously that I would "Murder" someone with bars….

get outta here with your funny self.

Last time I checked you were the horror core rapper monster character…. lmao.

[The Ghost of Freak]

Originally Posted by UhMAZING

I forgot who you are?...who are you again?.....
Oh yeah, the one with an incredibly shitty negative record talking about how he's going to "Murder" someone with bars. Smh.

Hilarious… find a quote and post it where I ever said seriously that I would "Murder" someone with bars….

get outta here with your funny self.

Last time I checked you were the horror core rapper monster character…. lmao.

sometimes when i go to sleep i get naked and picture myself as a rabbit

sometimes when i go to sleep i get naked and picture myself as a rabbit

[J u s T C]

misinformation?

and this is misinformation how?

you don't have anything to reference it to, idiot

[J u s T C]

misinformation?

and this is misinformation how?

you don't have anything to reference it to, idiot

[J u s T C]

you don't know anything and you've just admited you're talking out of your ass.

Shall we continue?

[J u s T C]

you don't know anything and you've just admited you're talking out of your ass.

Shall we continue?

Originally Posted by Just C

you don't know anything and you've just admited you're talking out of your ass.

Shall we continue?

Misinformation at work, I've never said that. You have put something into my words which isn't there.

Originally Posted by Just C

you don't know anything and you've just admited you're talking out of your ass.

Shall we continue?

Misinformation at work, I've never said that. You have put something into my words which isn't there.

[RULE]

@Nicholas, try giving this thread a read.

http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136719

1/

[RULE]

@Nicholas, try giving this thread a read.

http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136719

1/

Originally Posted by RULE

@Nicholas, try giving this thread a read.

http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136719

1/

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

Originally Posted by RULE

@Nicholas, try giving this thread a read.

http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136719

1/

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned. Lieing about a staff member is not a rule, and yet you banned him for it.

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

Originally Posted by RULE

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

"EtH's perma-ban status has been reinforced by me due to his constant lies about the actions of the sites staff" - Rule

No Rule, I can read and I can read critically and that's the problem. People don't tend to like criticism and there lies the source of your disappointment.

Originally Posted by RULE

If you think he was banned for lying about a staff member, you either didnt read the thread or cannot read period.

In the 4+ years ive spent on this site i dont think ive been more disappointed in a person more than i am in you right now.

1/

"EtH's perma-ban status has been reinforced by me due to his constant lies about the actions of the sites staff" - Rule

No Rule, I can read and I can read critically and that's the problem. People don't tend to like criticism and there lies the source of your disappointment.

[Askari]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned

I disagree with this entirely. If you can provide some fair examples I'll concede; I can assure you that never once have any of the current staff (to my knowledge) acted in such a way.

By that reasoning I'd have banned Erupt when he and I were beefing. Just C would've banned damn near the whole site. Shit, EtH would've had a few people struck off himself no doubt.

But that never happened, and there's no real evidence to support otherwise. Anyone who has been or is currently banned is banned because they've committed infractions and amassed enough infraction points to justify that; be it through cheating, disrespecting staff or any other offence. As a highly experienced member of Letsbeef I can safely say that corruption at staff level has never been a widespread issue, nor has it been - at any time I can recall - a significant or even evident issue. Sometimes tough judgements must be made. Unfortunately, outcomes will never satisfy everyone.

I can appreciate your desire to look beneath the surface @Nicholas I genuinely do, you argue your point coherently and maturely. However, an executive decision was made by a long-standing, trusted and widely respected senior member of staff to enforce a ban - that had been lifted in the first place - as the member broke the rules again.

It may be trivial to some of you, but it's happened and it will not un-happen. I stand by @RULE's decision, regardless of what other mods or members would have done had they been in the same situation.

EDIT: EtH was essentially on probation after having a perma-ban lifted. You must bear that in mind when trying to defend him.

[Askari]

Originally Posted by Nicholas

I did, I don't agree with your actions and it seems like whenever a moderator or admin takes a dislike to someone that person always ends up banned

I disagree with this entirely. If you can provide some fair examples I'll concede; I can assure you that never once have any of the current staff (to my knowledge) acted in such a way.

By that reasoning I'd have banned Erupt when he and I were beefing. Just C would've banned damn near the whole site. Shit, EtH would've had a few people struck off himself no doubt.

But that never happened, and there's no real evidence to support otherwise. Anyone who has been or is currently banned is banned because they've committed infractions and amassed enough infraction points to justify that; be it through cheating, disrespecting staff or any other offence. As a highly experienced member of Letsbeef I can safely say that corruption at staff level has never been a widespread issue, nor has it been - at any time I can recall - a significant or even evident issue. Sometimes tough judgements must be made. Unfortunately, outcomes will never satisfy everyone.

I can appreciate your desire to look beneath the surface @Nicholas I genuinely do, you argue your point coherently and maturely. However, an executive decision was made by a long-standing, trusted and widely respected senior member of staff to enforce a ban - that had been lifted in the first place - as the member broke the rules again.

It may be trivial to some of you, but it's happened and it will not un-happen. I stand by @RULE's decision, regardless of what other mods or members would have done had they been in the same situation.

EDIT: EtH was essentially on probation after having a perma-ban lifted. You must bear that in mind when trying to defend him.