Heaven....nah yo

Originally Posted by Godbody

That's what I'm saying @BLNK

But Philosophy exists because we haven't been able to answer our questions

Think of a fork in the road... philosophy is one option and science is another

but those can lead you to danger...you can rack your brain forever with philosophy and die a confused madman... You can rack your brain forever trying to prove things through science and die a confused madman

therefore you don't pick either route and you go straight to "there's a creator, period"

It is actually the most logical explanation because logic dictates that nothing logical we've tried has yielded the results that can answer all of our existential questions

Or you do what people have done for centuries, and view philosophy, and science as cooperative pursuits.

Side note: Nothing YET. Does that mean that the pursuit should be abandoned in entirety?

---------- Post added at 04:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:00 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

Are you being petty? lol Is it because I used the word build?

Nah, I'm schooling you, homie.

BITCH I HATE YOU!!!!!

Originally Posted by Godbody

That's what I'm saying @BLNK

But Philosophy exists because we haven't been able to answer our questions

Think of a fork in the road... philosophy is one option and science is another

but those can lead you to danger...you can rack your brain forever with philosophy and die a confused madman... You can rack your brain forever trying to prove things through science and die a confused madman

therefore you don't pick either route and you go straight to "there's a creator, period"

It is actually the most logical explanation because logic dictates that nothing logical we've tried has yielded the results that can answer all of our existential questions

Or you do what people have done for centuries, and view philosophy, and science as cooperative pursuits.

Side note: Nothing YET. Does that mean that the pursuit should be abandoned in entirety?

---------- Post added at 04:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:00 PM ----------

Originally Posted by SpookyDeep

Are you being petty? lol Is it because I used the word build?

Nah, I'm schooling you, homie.

BITCH I HATE YOU!!!!!

[Godbody]

cooperative in what sense

they haven't answered the existential questions. You said so yourself, we've been around for centuries. By now a people that have managed to create lasers, crafts that can reach outside of our own atmosphere, and create clones through stem cells surely should have the knowledge as to why we're here, what got us here, what happens after, etc


& the funny thing is we should've found out why we here before we found out how to build spaceships and lasers and create clones

I'm pretty sure people have been asking "Why are we here?" "Who put us here?" "What happens next?" waaaaay before they were like "Shit, can we build lasers, spaceships, and clones?"

lol

[Godbody]

cooperative in what sense

they haven't answered the existential questions. You said so yourself, we've been around for centuries. By now a people that have managed to create lasers, crafts that can reach outside of our own atmosphere, and create clones through stem cells surely should have the knowledge as to why we're here, what got us here, what happens after, etc


& the funny thing is we should've found out why we here before we found out how to build spaceships and lasers and create clones

I'm pretty sure people have been asking "Why are we here?" "Who put us here?" "What happens next?" waaaaay before they were like "Shit, can we build lasers, spaceships, and clones?"

lol

Originally Posted by Godbody

cooperative in what sense

they haven't answered the existential questions. You said so yourself, we've been around for centuries. By now a people that have managed to create lasers, crafts that can reach outside of our own atmosphere, and create clones through stem cells surely should have the knowledge as to why we're here, what got us here, what happens after, etc


& the funny thing is we should've found out why we here before we found out how to build spaceships and lasers and create clones

I'm pretty sure people have been asking "Why are we here?" "Who put us here?" "What happens next?" waaaaay before they were like "Shit, can we build lasers, spaceships, and clones?"

lol

Cooperative in the sense that without one another there would be neither.

Originally Posted by Godbody

cooperative in what sense

they haven't answered the existential questions. You said so yourself, we've been around for centuries. By now a people that have managed to create lasers, crafts that can reach outside of our own atmosphere, and create clones through stem cells surely should have the knowledge as to why we're here, what got us here, what happens after, etc


& the funny thing is we should've found out why we here before we found out how to build spaceships and lasers and create clones

I'm pretty sure people have been asking "Why are we here?" "Who put us here?" "What happens next?" waaaaay before they were like "Shit, can we build lasers, spaceships, and clones?"

lol

Cooperative in the sense that without one another there would be neither.

[Godbody]

Philosophy will always exist as people will always ask these existential questions

Its in our nature to question how we came to inhabit this vast environment and what put us here

Maybe when we have the answer one, or both, will cease to exist. But Philosophy can exist without science.

The same way science can exist without philosophy

If Science proved everything we needed answered, we wouldnt have Philosophy

[Godbody]

Philosophy will always exist as people will always ask these existential questions

Its in our nature to question how we came to inhabit this vast environment and what put us here

Maybe when we have the answer one, or both, will cease to exist. But Philosophy can exist without science.

The same way science can exist without philosophy

If Science proved everything we needed answered, we wouldnt have Philosophy

Philosophy is the question, science is the answer. Without questions, there are no answers. Without answers there are no questions. Therefore without either science, or philosophy, there would be neither.

Philosophy is the question, science is the answer. Without questions, there are no answers. Without answers there are no questions. Therefore without either science, or philosophy, there would be neither.

Originally Posted by BLNK

Philosophy is the question, science is the answer. Without questions, there are no answers. Without answers there are no questions. Therefore without either science, or philosophy, there would be neither.

^This.

Originally Posted by BLNK

Philosophy is the question, science is the answer. Without questions, there are no answers. Without answers there are no questions. Therefore without either science, or philosophy, there would be neither.

^This.

[Louie Dawgs]

Originally Posted by BLNK

Philosophy is the question, science is the answer. Without questions, there are no answers. Without answers there are no questions. Therefore without either science, or philosophy, there would be neither.

This is not entirely true.

Science is a very broad term, and desires to explain the phenomena of the universe through testable means.

Philosophy helps to give meaning to science, and vice versa, but it neither requires the other. A guy stuck on a deserted island can perform some measure of science in order to understand how to build a bigger bonfire without any philosophical inclinations.

Likewise, someone can build an entire philosophical system without doing any science, ever reading a scientific textbook, or knowing a single thing about science.

They are not symbiotic.

[Louie Dawgs]

Originally Posted by BLNK

Philosophy is the question, science is the answer. Without questions, there are no answers. Without answers there are no questions. Therefore without either science, or philosophy, there would be neither.

This is not entirely true.

Science is a very broad term, and desires to explain the phenomena of the universe through testable means.

Philosophy helps to give meaning to science, and vice versa, but it neither requires the other. A guy stuck on a deserted island can perform some measure of science in order to understand how to build a bigger bonfire without any philosophical inclinations.

Likewise, someone can build an entire philosophical system without doing any science, ever reading a scientific textbook, or knowing a single thing about science.

They are not symbiotic.

Originally Posted by Louie Dawgs

This is not entirely true.

Science is a very broad term, and desires to explain the phenomena of the universe through testable means.

Philosophy helps to give meaning to science, and vice versa, but it neither requires the other. A guy stuck on a deserted island can perform some measure of science in order to understand how to build a bigger bonfire without any philosophical inclinations.

Likewise, someone can build an entire philosophical system without doing any science, ever reading a scientific textbook, or knowing a single thing about science.

They are not symbiotic.

In their earliest forms, did not philosophy facilitate science? Also, to understand, must one not question? Is curiosity not one of the foundational attributes of Philosophy? Wouldn't, then, the questions that the man on the deserted island were to ask be philosophical in nature?

Originally Posted by Louie Dawgs

This is not entirely true.

Science is a very broad term, and desires to explain the phenomena of the universe through testable means.

Philosophy helps to give meaning to science, and vice versa, but it neither requires the other. A guy stuck on a deserted island can perform some measure of science in order to understand how to build a bigger bonfire without any philosophical inclinations.

Likewise, someone can build an entire philosophical system without doing any science, ever reading a scientific textbook, or knowing a single thing about science.

They are not symbiotic.

In their earliest forms, did not philosophy facilitate science? Also, to understand, must one not question? Is curiosity not one of the foundational attributes of Philosophy? Wouldn't, then, the questions that the man on the deserted island were to ask be philosophical in nature?

Just found water on Mars.

http://gizmodo.com/nasas-curiosity-r...oil-1403908591

Just found water on Mars.

http://gizmodo.com/nasas-curiosity-r...oil-1403908591

[Obey]

"We heat [the soil] up to 835C and drive off all the volatiles and measure them," Was a quote from @Agonize's article. Nigga this thing is a walking easy-bake oven somewhere in the Mexico desert.

[Obey]

"We heat [the soil] up to 835C and drive off all the volatiles and measure them," Was a quote from @Agonize's article. Nigga this thing is a walking easy-bake oven somewhere in the Mexico desert.