King Titles

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

You've seen the thread. I asked for peoples feedback, for clarity.

They didnt want anyone stripped so we changed it to 7 successful LBA title matches, including no shows. As thats the only criteria that allows me and Seul to keep the title.

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Edgeworth

See this is part of the problem man. We STILL have no clear criteria for the shit. Rai’s gotta earn it with another defence but because you’ve beat Phil
Banks (which is a great win, that’s not my point) you just get it off that alone? Shits too inconsistent to be taken seriously

You've seen the thread. I asked for peoples feedback, for clarity.

They didnt want anyone stripped so we changed it to 7 successful LBA title matches, including no shows. As thats the only criteria that allows me and Seul to keep the title.

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

I disagree with this. Me and Kiwi are probably going forward with this but youre talking about putting the legacy of something pretty dope in the hands of a non democratic decision

[EtH]

Originally Posted by RULE

What we need really is a new LBA host, and let them pick the achievement.

I disagree with this. Me and Kiwi are probably going forward with this but youre talking about putting the legacy of something pretty dope in the hands of a non democratic decision