King Titles

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

You'll be a nice mid-tier warm up

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by RULE

You'll be a nice mid-tier warm up

[Student]

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

[Student]

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Student

I get that 7 (consecutive) title defenses are more impressive then 7 total title defenses BUT what's the point in keeping track of everybody's record if ultimately it's not going to matter?


If the LBA/LBT is a monthly event why not incentivize battlers with the promise of earning a permanent title if they're able to earn and defend their LBA/LBT Champion title 7 times, more then half a year?


Also I reread that thread @RULE originally made and the majority agreed that nobody should have their title stripped so that shouldn't even be in question, this should only be regarding future LBA/LBT Champions.


I think it's stupid @Celsius & @Shodan aren't qualified to, first of all, beat enough opponents to win the LBT Champion title back and defend it until they have 7 total defenses to win the LBT King title.


Also in history there's already's been multiple kings, i.e. King of England, Scotland, Ireland, France, etc. so I don't get y'alls aversions to having multiple ones.

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

[Student]

Originally Posted by RULE

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

So off my whole post that's the only part you respond to?

[Student]

Originally Posted by RULE

I think people wanted it changed to: LBA Legend / LBT Legend

Would make more sense grammatically i guess?

So off my whole post that's the only part you respond to?

[Seul]

I don't care what the criteria is, y'all flip-flopping every other day so come up to your own conclusions.

[Seul]

I don't care what the criteria is, y'all flip-flopping every other day so come up to your own conclusions.

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

Illo had 10 consec defences.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Noir

Criteria is 8 consecutive title defenses, point blank period. Once someone bests ILLo's run in text, he loses the title, unless someone gets 8 defenses and they battle ILLo for the title or something. No one in audio should have the title until they reach 8 consecutive.

Makes the most sense. Let's honor the history that ILLo made, and honor the conception of that title itself.

Illo had 10 consec defences.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

I'm not counting no-shows, nor should anyone else.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

I'm not counting no-shows, nor should anyone else.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

2 of them were no-shows.

Originally Posted by RULE

Illo had 10 consec defences.

2 of them were no-shows.

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Rieper

2 of them were no-shows.

ILLoKWENT
1x LBT Champion
10 Wins (2 Via No Show) - 0 Losses

Battle Record:
Vs Black Book (94%) - Won the LBT Title
Vs Rant (100%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Phroxen (52%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Obey (94%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Dissizit (91%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Erupt (No Show) - Defended LBT Title
Vs ELOH STACKz (81%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs MAN DOWN (No Show) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Rican (83%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs GRizzEAT (76%) - Defended LBT Title


His longest consecutive run was 5

[RULE]

Originally Posted by Rieper

2 of them were no-shows.

ILLoKWENT
1x LBT Champion
10 Wins (2 Via No Show) - 0 Losses

Battle Record:
Vs Black Book (94%) - Won the LBT Title
Vs Rant (100%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Phroxen (52%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Obey (94%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Dissizit (91%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Erupt (No Show) - Defended LBT Title
Vs ELOH STACKz (81%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs MAN DOWN (No Show) - Defended LBT Title
Vs Rican (83%) - Defended LBT Title
Vs GRizzEAT (76%) - Defended LBT Title


His longest consecutive run was 5