If you want to be considered for a Wild Card entry to the Text OR Audio GC...

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

Can you though? Answer my question.

I absolutely can. I'm just not a big fan of trying to deceive a group of people when they clearly aren't buying it.

Maybe try your hand in politics sometimes. You might get away with self-voting then, or maybe you can blame it on the Russians (Stalin specifically).

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

Can you though? Answer my question.

I absolutely can. I'm just not a big fan of trying to deceive a group of people when they clearly aren't buying it.

Maybe try your hand in politics sometimes. You might get away with self-voting then, or maybe you can blame it on the Russians (Stalin specifically).

[Aggo]

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

Can you though? Answer my question.

Why not answer my question about why you made a lock biting thread (in the same "Biting accusation thread 3339" style that lock and rican were going back and forth with) when locks battle came before the one you accused him of biting from?

You wont say why. So I will.

I fed rican the false info that lock was biting. I knew rican would turn right around and make a thread about it. What I couldnt have predicted is that you would do it from a multi account of someone who seemingly had no beef with lock. But boom. Literally minutes after I gave rican the info, Hawtlanta had made the accusation. Weird.

And now that Rican is "Self banned" for 2 weeks (which isnt suspect at all) hawtlantas multi is all up in the forums hella active. That's weird too because I've been here for years and have never known swift or hawt to be very active in the forums.

Also strange that you use the same exact ignore and deflect tactics that Rican does in the forums. And that you use the same dismissive "are you okay, buddy" that rican likes to use.

How many times have you written chico and had to go back and correct yourself?

Not fooling anyone chico

[Aggo]

Originally Posted by swiftkeys

Can you though? Answer my question.

Why not answer my question about why you made a lock biting thread (in the same "Biting accusation thread 3339" style that lock and rican were going back and forth with) when locks battle came before the one you accused him of biting from?

You wont say why. So I will.

I fed rican the false info that lock was biting. I knew rican would turn right around and make a thread about it. What I couldnt have predicted is that you would do it from a multi account of someone who seemingly had no beef with lock. But boom. Literally minutes after I gave rican the info, Hawtlanta had made the accusation. Weird.

And now that Rican is "Self banned" for 2 weeks (which isnt suspect at all) hawtlantas multi is all up in the forums hella active. That's weird too because I've been here for years and have never known swift or hawt to be very active in the forums.

Also strange that you use the same exact ignore and deflect tactics that Rican does in the forums. And that you use the same dismissive "are you okay, buddy" that rican likes to use.

How many times have you written chico and had to go back and correct yourself?

Not fooling anyone chico

[swiftkeys]

Can you?

---------- Post added at 01:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 AM ----------

Let's start now.

[swiftkeys]

Can you?

---------- Post added at 01:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:42 AM ----------

Let's start now.

Sure. Go write for your next live battle. Make sure you don't bite text bars from 2007 this time, though.

Sure. Go write for your next live battle. Make sure you don't bite text bars from 2007 this time, though.

[swiftkeys]

Okay, 2 weeks. Deal?

[swiftkeys]

Okay, 2 weeks. Deal?

Nah you'll somehow vote for yourself on our deal.

Nah you'll somehow vote for yourself on our deal.

[swiftkeys]

So you can't go 2 weeks without bringing that up nor being obsessed with the dude?

Are you okay, buddy?

Can you really?

[swiftkeys]

So you can't go 2 weeks without bringing that up nor being obsessed with the dude?

Are you okay, buddy?

Can you really?

[Seul]

Regardless, the fact these accounts show up before GCs make's me question the validity of their votes and intentions. Multi's shouldn't be allowed to enter tourneys / should be banned.

[Seul]

Regardless, the fact these accounts show up before GCs make's me question the validity of their votes and intentions. Multi's shouldn't be allowed to enter tourneys / should be banned.

You should be happy you're being brought up this much here, cause no one else outside of this site brings you up anywhere near this amount.

You should be happy you're being brought up this much here, cause no one else outside of this site brings you up anywhere near this amount.

[swiftkeys]

Can you, @Rieper?

---------- Post added at 01:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Seul

Regardless, the fact these accounts show up before GCs make's me question the validity of their votes and intentions. Multi's shouldn't be allowed to enter tourneys / should be banned.

I don't think there is multis qualifying so you should be at ease

[swiftkeys]

Can you, @Rieper?

---------- Post added at 01:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:51 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Seul

Regardless, the fact these accounts show up before GCs make's me question the validity of their votes and intentions. Multi's shouldn't be allowed to enter tourneys / should be banned.

I don't think there is multis qualifying so you should be at ease