Weed smokers get into this thread

Originally Posted by Catharsis

Maybe a joint of mexican brick pack is equal to one can of beer. .... The "regs" I smoke is pretty decent weed, never bricked or anything like that, usually some backyard boogie chrons.
Idk...weed and booze are too different to compare.
Coke a heroin... ya know?

truth.

the only things you can compare are their potential physical damage

in moderation they are both pretty much harmless. (the hairs in your respiratory system shouldn't be burned/singed, if they are you will feel that "harsh" pain, which means ur doing something wrong... only if ur concerned with that kinda pussy shit)


in abuse. they aren't even in the same ballpark

Originally Posted by Catharsis

Maybe a joint of mexican brick pack is equal to one can of beer. .... The "regs" I smoke is pretty decent weed, never bricked or anything like that, usually some backyard boogie chrons.
Idk...weed and booze are too different to compare.
Coke a heroin... ya know?

truth.

the only things you can compare are their potential physical damage

in moderation they are both pretty much harmless. (the hairs in your respiratory system shouldn't be burned/singed, if they are you will feel that "harsh" pain, which means ur doing something wrong... only if ur concerned with that kinda pussy shit)


in abuse. they aren't even in the same ballpark

[Just C]

No physically in abuse they Rent in the same ball park. refer to population control. But Im saying SMOKING Damages the lungs. Thats what the initial debate was. And you can't argue with that. As far as the bammer weed comment is concerned. Are you refering to feeds/yeild enhancers? The chemicles that alter DNA structure?

[Just C]

No physically in abuse they Rent in the same ball park. refer to population control. But Im saying SMOKING Damages the lungs. Thats what the initial debate was. And you can't argue with that. As far as the bammer weed comment is concerned. Are you refering to feeds/yeild enhancers? The chemicles that alter DNA structure?

[Just C]

aint* not rent

[Just C]

aint* not rent

[Phroxen]

Originally Posted by Jason

increases your risk of cancer...

lmao, if this is the captain of the counter-argument, they failed miserably.

Originally Posted by Jason

weed > alcohol for negative effects. Your more likely to be sick or get into an accident.

lmao, again. Failed miserably. Liver failure. Alcohol poisoning. Kidney damage. Whatever that bumpy nasty looking nose disorder (for lack of a better word) is that severe long term alcoholics get. Blacking out. Vomiting. [all side effects of heavy alcohol use]

The list goes on for alcohol. But weed? You can't name one proven negative side effect, unless you consider occasional paranoia, abstract thoughts, or running out of junk food a negative side effect.

There is no counter-argument. Team anti-weed fails.



/thread

[Phroxen]

Originally Posted by Jason

increases your risk of cancer...

lmao, if this is the captain of the counter-argument, they failed miserably.

Originally Posted by Jason

weed > alcohol for negative effects. Your more likely to be sick or get into an accident.

lmao, again. Failed miserably. Liver failure. Alcohol poisoning. Kidney damage. Whatever that bumpy nasty looking nose disorder (for lack of a better word) is that severe long term alcoholics get. Blacking out. Vomiting. [all side effects of heavy alcohol use]

The list goes on for alcohol. But weed? You can't name one proven negative side effect, unless you consider occasional paranoia, abstract thoughts, or running out of junk food a negative side effect.

There is no counter-argument. Team anti-weed fails.



/thread

[Ray Zeus]

^^^ agrees... but Huey is sonning everybody in this thread lmaooo and alcohol and weed is no comparison in damaging effects... look at it like this... when you smoke JUST enough to get you high... and drink JUST enough to get you drunk... which is fucking you up more??? you can get high off a couple puffs... its gonna take like 5 cans of bear to get you drunk...

[Ray Zeus]

^^^ agrees... but Huey is sonning everybody in this thread lmaooo and alcohol and weed is no comparison in damaging effects... look at it like this... when you smoke JUST enough to get you high... and drink JUST enough to get you drunk... which is fucking you up more??? you can get high off a couple puffs... its gonna take like 5 cans of bear to get you drunk...

[Just C]

Dreadz says hueys sonning everyone then proves me right over huey in the same post without even realizing it. Meh. Can't be fucked. Its like talking to a brick wall. I'll leave Huey to see if he can spot the contradiction I did. Have fun.

[Just C]

Dreadz says hueys sonning everyone then proves me right over huey in the same post without even realizing it. Meh. Can't be fucked. Its like talking to a brick wall. I'll leave Huey to see if he can spot the contradiction I did. Have fun.

[Ray Zeus]

im pretty sure taking 3 puffs of weed is healthier than 5 cans of bear... smh...

[Ray Zeus]

im pretty sure taking 3 puffs of weed is healthier than 5 cans of bear... smh...

[Just C]

Wasnt talking about that. But you're close. Try again.

[Just C]

Wasnt talking about that. But you're close. Try again.

[Ray Zeus]

what that they're no comparison in damaging effects???

[Ray Zeus]

what that they're no comparison in damaging effects???

which contradiction are you talking about? lol @ you and jason backpedaling and pretending like you were talking about smoking anything. i smell you cuz

yo get out of my thread

which contradiction are you talking about? lol @ you and jason backpedaling and pretending like you were talking about smoking anything. i smell you cuz

yo get out of my thread