Public Callout (Fuel vs Rowdy)

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

Odin is mad that I beat him and am better than he is so he takes it out on me through bad voting. Like a bitch

Errr... you came in here crying foul play over your inability to stay on scheme (in an 8 liner) and proceed to vent your feelings over it.

But attempt to call me 'mad' over you and your inability to rhyme with the word Chase in your opening multi set...?

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

Odin is mad that I beat him and am better than he is so he takes it out on me through bad voting. Like a bitch

Errr... you came in here crying foul play over your inability to stay on scheme (in an 8 liner) and proceed to vent your feelings over it.

But attempt to call me 'mad' over you and your inability to rhyme with the word Chase in your opening multi set...?

Oh no I didn’t call you mad because of your nit picky double standard vote.

I called you mad because I beat that ass in a battle, and I’m just all around better than you are. That’s why I think you’re mad. That’s why you hate vote me. It’s the only way you can get back at me

Oh no I didn’t call you mad because of your nit picky double standard vote.

I called you mad because I beat that ass in a battle, and I’m just all around better than you are. That’s why I think you’re mad. That’s why you hate vote me. It’s the only way you can get back at me

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

Oh no I didn’t call you mad because of your nit picky double standard vote.

I called you mad because I beat that ass in a battle, and I’m just all around better than you are. That’s why I think you’re mad. That’s why you hate vote me. It’s the only way you can get back at me

Oh i see. You're attempting a 'Red Herring' here by trying to divert away from the original topic at hand.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

Oh no I didn’t call you mad because of your nit picky double standard vote.

I called you mad because I beat that ass in a battle, and I’m just all around better than you are. That’s why I think you’re mad. That’s why you hate vote me. It’s the only way you can get back at me

Oh i see. You're attempting a 'Red Herring' here by trying to divert away from the original topic at hand.

I mean, think about it from my perspective for one second:

The first sentence of your vote calls me out for several words(not just one word like you’re claiming now) that apparently don’t slant with the scheme, but then you turn around and Basically tell Kiwi “at least you stayed on scheme” even though we used majority of the same slant types. I get if you thought his punches/concepts were better but to pretend I was off scheme while he was on scheme even though we used the same words is absolutely ridiculous man.

So you either didn’t properly word your vote, or you just flat out wanted to be picky with my verse and not apply that same standard to my opponent- the question is why?

I mean, think about it from my perspective for one second:

The first sentence of your vote calls me out for several words(not just one word like you’re claiming now) that apparently don’t slant with the scheme, but then you turn around and Basically tell Kiwi “at least you stayed on scheme” even though we used majority of the same slant types. I get if you thought his punches/concepts were better but to pretend I was off scheme while he was on scheme even though we used the same words is absolutely ridiculous man.

So you either didn’t properly word your vote, or you just flat out wanted to be picky with my verse and not apply that same standard to my opponent- the question is why?

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

I mean, think about it from my perspective for one second:

The first sentence of your vote calls me out for several words(not just one word like you’re claiming now) that apparently don’t slant with the scheme, but then you turn around and Basically tell Kiwi “at least you stayed on scheme” even though we used majority of the same slant types. I get if you thought his punches/concepts were better but to pretend I was off scheme while he was on scheme even though we used the same words is absolutely ridiculous man.

So you either didn’t properly word your vote, or you just flat out wanted to be picky with my verse and not apply that same standard to my opponent- the question is why?

Culp: Opening bar set isn't on scheme: DANK, PLAYED, MADE = CHASE.

^The odd one out of this is Dank. The reason i put all three of the words in your first bar's Multis in there with the = sign was to indicate the fact that It doesn't fit. Your very first multi set is nowhere near the Scheme you both decided to use. It's a scheme battle. I stand by my vote and my comment.

I've literally no reason to 'hate vote' or be specifically 'nit-picky' with you at all. I can understand that you may feel that in fact that's what is going on due to so many on LB who are like this, i am not one of them. I simply vote and comment on what is wrong with a piece and where someone can improve. Same if someone uses WP that is forced and or doesn't work grammatically etc etc.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

I mean, think about it from my perspective for one second:

The first sentence of your vote calls me out for several words(not just one word like you’re claiming now) that apparently don’t slant with the scheme, but then you turn around and Basically tell Kiwi “at least you stayed on scheme” even though we used majority of the same slant types. I get if you thought his punches/concepts were better but to pretend I was off scheme while he was on scheme even though we used the same words is absolutely ridiculous man.

So you either didn’t properly word your vote, or you just flat out wanted to be picky with my verse and not apply that same standard to my opponent- the question is why?

Culp: Opening bar set isn't on scheme: DANK, PLAYED, MADE = CHASE.

^The odd one out of this is Dank. The reason i put all three of the words in your first bar's Multis in there with the = sign was to indicate the fact that It doesn't fit. Your very first multi set is nowhere near the Scheme you both decided to use. It's a scheme battle. I stand by my vote and my comment.

I've literally no reason to 'hate vote' or be specifically 'nit-picky' with you at all. I can understand that you may feel that in fact that's what is going on due to so many on LB who are like this, i am not one of them. I simply vote and comment on what is wrong with a piece and where someone can improve. Same if someone uses WP that is forced and or doesn't work grammatically etc etc.

That explanation doesn’t make sense though- because if you thought it was just the word “dank” you would have said that. But by listing all 3 of those together you tried to imply that it was in fact all 3 of those that didn’t work... until I pointed out that Kiwi used the same word/slant in 2/3 words you listed.

That explanation doesn’t make sense though- because if you thought it was just the word “dank” you would have said that. But by listing all 3 of those together you tried to imply that it was in fact all 3 of those that didn’t work... until I pointed out that Kiwi used the same word/slant in 2/3 words you listed.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

That explanation doesn’t make sense though- because if you thought it was just the word “dank” you would have said that. But by listing all 3 of those together you tried to imply that it was in fact all 3 of those that didn’t work... until I pointed out that Kiwi used the same word/slant in 2/3 words you listed.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

That explanation doesn’t make sense though- because if you thought it was just the word “dank” you would have said that. But by listing all 3 of those together you tried to imply that it was in fact all 3 of those that didn’t work... until I pointed out that Kiwi used the same word/slant in 2/3 words you listed.

Forreal man, How did you make it known in your original vote that “dank” was the one odd one out?

The answer is you didn’t. You listed all 3 of those words together purposely to make it seem like I was off scheme, and after I pointed out how we used similar words/slants you’re only focused on one of those words listed because it happens to be the only one Kiwi didn’t also use.

Not a good look at all for you.

Forreal man, How did you make it known in your original vote that “dank” was the one odd one out?

The answer is you didn’t. You listed all 3 of those words together purposely to make it seem like I was off scheme, and after I pointed out how we used similar words/slants you’re only focused on one of those words listed because it happens to be the only one Kiwi didn’t also use.

Not a good look at all for you.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

Forreal man, How did you make it known in your original vote that “dank” was the one odd one out?

The answer is you didn’t. You listed all 3 of those words together purposely to make it seem like I was off scheme, and after I pointed out how we used similar words/slants you’re only focused on one of those words listed because it happens to be the only one Kiwi didn’t also use.

Not a good look at all for you.

Once again, it is not my fault that you posses the inability to understand my comment. I wonder how many pages of this thread shall we use to continue saying the same thing?

Your opening bar in the SCHEME battle was off. End of.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by CulpritT

Forreal man, How did you make it known in your original vote that “dank” was the one odd one out?

The answer is you didn’t. You listed all 3 of those words together purposely to make it seem like I was off scheme, and after I pointed out how we used similar words/slants you’re only focused on one of those words listed because it happens to be the only one Kiwi didn’t also use.

Not a good look at all for you.

Once again, it is not my fault that you posses the inability to understand my comment. I wonder how many pages of this thread shall we use to continue saying the same thing?

Your opening bar in the SCHEME battle was off. End of.

[EtH]

Crazy how Fuel has an excuse for all 68 losses.

[EtH]

Crazy how Fuel has an excuse for all 68 losses.