King Titles

Originally Posted by Malishus

i dont know what the fuck u are on about, eth talked to me about it, but there wasnt any concrete agreement on a battle or stipulation for that matter. and besides i agree shit would be corny if i called out rai to put up his title on the line against my multi acct... yes it would be an interesting matchup, but i said it once and ill say it again.. my ILLO acct is retired. . anyone want to battle me can see this acct..

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

Originally Posted by Malishus

i dont know what the fuck u are on about, eth talked to me about it, but there wasnt any concrete agreement on a battle or stipulation for that matter. and besides i agree shit would be corny if i called out rai to put up his title on the line against my multi acct... yes it would be an interesting matchup, but i said it once and ill say it again.. my ILLO acct is retired. . anyone want to battle me can see this acct..

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

[Malishus]

Originally Posted by Rieper

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

[Malishus]

Originally Posted by Rieper

You basically just agreed to what my post was about, though.

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by Malishus

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

^ fair enough. It was just announced as a battle with that stipulation in the LBT thread, is all. But probably a miscommunication then by the sounds of it.

[Edgeworth]

Originally Posted by Malishus

uh, yeah when my posts states that i agree with the corniness,then thats pretty much self explanatory. my initial point was you sounded like u were on some bitch tirade that HOW DARE HE CHALLENGE RAI AND RAI AGREED TO BATTLE HIM ON HIS MULTI ACCT. like the whole shit was based on actual FACT.. im just making it clear that there wont be a battle that will involve rai putting up his LBT KING.. its also fact that in my opinion, as me and eth talked about it in jest, is that rais LBT KING award is illegitamate, only because im basing it on the original parameters... with that being said, RAI definately deserves it under the new rules that was proclimated and he battled under.. currently there is no right or wrong at this point as far as rules goes.. the original intent was to make it next to impossible to achieve the LBT KING title, so that way there would be very few people if any walking around with it. hence the reason for the 7+ straight title defenses in a row... or 10 straight, if your counting noshows... but because times change and in order to create more of an incentive to participate in LBT, the new parameters were created to make the permanent title more achievable. noones wrong , its what ever the person who is making the time and effort to run it, decides. i personally believe it should return to 7 straight defenses at the very least to obtain the title, whether it be LBT KING, or LBT LEGENDS, i honestly dont give a fuck, i simply battle, if the powers that be want to strip my title, so everyone can sleep at night, so be it.

^ fair enough. It was just announced as a battle with that stipulation in the LBT thread, is all. But probably a miscommunication then by the sounds of it.