are u fucking kidding me ??

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Hastur

Steve, apart from the whole "open battle swaying," I voted against you because your "bars," while their construction was better than your opponents, were basically meaningless, as far as I am concerned.

"seriously I don't know what this MAN PREACHES but this FAG REACHES ! more confusing than one of 'RANTS' SPEECHES !"

"what ya talkin bout fool ? I should rip out this NIGGAS BLADDER for chatting all that JIBBER JABBER ! if ya want to elevat ya should by a BIGGER LADDER ! "

Lolwat? These ain't bars, fam. Where are the punches? Where are the concepts? Rant/rant is a concept now? No, it ain't. Your "bars" were so bad that your opponent won this battle solely on the basis of the fact that he didn't try to punch. .

remember the point of a punch is to diss your opponent whether straight forward..ex.so and so is a sheep fucker....or. using similes/metas/analogies etc...as a means to up the creativity of ones insult... in this case i see two types of figures of speech..simile and metaphor.... although very very rudimentary are still apparent... first one is him insulting his opponents bars as confusing and comparing it rants speeches using like or 'as'.....so his c9ncept here is 'confusing'..his setup was also relevant that led to his conclusion....next concept is 'elevate further' connecting with bigger ladder...the setup here was a fail. It didnt sculpt out why the opponent wants to elevate further..ex.. dude asking for advice in the threads or anything else that setsup the concept......bottomline is although they arent exactly cutting edge HOF material ..they still utilize imagry and allusion
that works at insulting his opponent..

[ILLoKWENT]

Originally Posted by Hastur

Steve, apart from the whole "open battle swaying," I voted against you because your "bars," while their construction was better than your opponents, were basically meaningless, as far as I am concerned.

"seriously I don't know what this MAN PREACHES but this FAG REACHES ! more confusing than one of 'RANTS' SPEECHES !"

"what ya talkin bout fool ? I should rip out this NIGGAS BLADDER for chatting all that JIBBER JABBER ! if ya want to elevat ya should by a BIGGER LADDER ! "

Lolwat? These ain't bars, fam. Where are the punches? Where are the concepts? Rant/rant is a concept now? No, it ain't. Your "bars" were so bad that your opponent won this battle solely on the basis of the fact that he didn't try to punch. .

remember the point of a punch is to diss your opponent whether straight forward..ex.so and so is a sheep fucker....or. using similes/metas/analogies etc...as a means to up the creativity of ones insult... in this case i see two types of figures of speech..simile and metaphor.... although very very rudimentary are still apparent... first one is him insulting his opponents bars as confusing and comparing it rants speeches using like or 'as'.....so his c9ncept here is 'confusing'..his setup was also relevant that led to his conclusion....next concept is 'elevate further' connecting with bigger ladder...the setup here was a fail. It didnt sculpt out why the opponent wants to elevate further..ex.. dude asking for advice in the threads or anything else that setsup the concept......bottomline is although they arent exactly cutting edge HOF material ..they still utilize imagry and allusion
that works at insulting his opponent..