Survey: Capitol Punishment

I think everyone should allow it, for example in the case of the two Muslim guys who killed the soldier (or the poor guy being made the official face of racial profiling). They did that and were caught red handed, that's 100% fine to kill them over.

But a Judge or Jury are mere men. To hold someone's life in your hands when there is a % chance you are wrong, it doesn't work out imo.

I think everyone should allow it, for example in the case of the two Muslim guys who killed the soldier (or the poor guy being made the official face of racial profiling). They did that and were caught red handed, that's 100% fine to kill them over.

But a Judge or Jury are mere men. To hold someone's life in your hands when there is a % chance you are wrong, it doesn't work out imo.

Originally Posted by Erebus

I think everyone should allow it, for example in the case of the two Muslim guys who killed the soldier (or the poor guy being made the official face of racial profiling). They did that and were caught red handed, that's 100% fine to kill them over.

But a Judge or Jury are mere men. To hold someone's life in your hands when there is a % chance you are wrong, it doesn't work out imo.

good point but at the same time thats what makes it hard to decipher. what if you are killing an innocent person

Originally Posted by Erebus

I think everyone should allow it, for example in the case of the two Muslim guys who killed the soldier (or the poor guy being made the official face of racial profiling). They did that and were caught red handed, that's 100% fine to kill them over.

But a Judge or Jury are mere men. To hold someone's life in your hands when there is a % chance you are wrong, it doesn't work out imo.

good point but at the same time thats what makes it hard to decipher. what if you are killing an innocent person