anyone wondering about the trayvon martin case

i never said assuming or not assuming is the right way to go.

im saying jason is wrong to assume anything based on black crime rates if he isnt going to assume zimmerman is guilty of murder based on parole violations, direct disobedience of authority, and video of no visible physical injury. If STATISTICS are enough for you to assume blacks are more likely to commit a crime, then the evidence at hand should be more than enough for you too assume zimmermans guilty. but you choose not to, in this situation.. and im wondering why. you have to choose, are you one to assume the motives of another human being on limited/interpretted evidence (misc. object in a mans pocket/black crime rates) or are you one of equal and just fairness in all scenarios

i never said assuming or not assuming is the right way to go.

im saying jason is wrong to assume anything based on black crime rates if he isnt going to assume zimmerman is guilty of murder based on parole violations, direct disobedience of authority, and video of no visible physical injury. If STATISTICS are enough for you to assume blacks are more likely to commit a crime, then the evidence at hand should be more than enough for you too assume zimmermans guilty. but you choose not to, in this situation.. and im wondering why. you have to choose, are you one to assume the motives of another human being on limited/interpretted evidence (misc. object in a mans pocket/black crime rates) or are you one of equal and just fairness in all scenarios