Ideas For A Better LB(v4?)

[DonAiRE]

this is not a bad idea, but this is only a temporary fix.. theres a few aspects of LB that needs some sorta revitalization..

[DonAiRE]

this is not a bad idea, but this is only a temporary fix.. theres a few aspects of LB that needs some sorta revitalization..

[Heavy Verbz]

Originally Posted by T_N

...n LB Dollars are nice...that would be dope ..you could buy shit for emcee n other stuff..everybody would be interested for site if that shit happen ! nice idea.....

WIN

[Heavy Verbz]

Originally Posted by T_N

...n LB Dollars are nice...that would be dope ..you could buy shit for emcee n other stuff..everybody would be interested for site if that shit happen ! nice idea.....

WIN

[Trademark]

This seems like all gravy but reality is, when you are raising prices people will then leave to a free site, Goldmic trying doing this in 03, and hasn't been the same since, charging people more money for an premium account, they finally took it away in 05 and everyone whom left returned to battle... What seems like a good idea, sometimes works out for the worse, think about it, I MEAN WHO IN A LOGICAL MIND, is going to pay 10$ a month for something? the majority of this site is BASIC MEMBERS, what makes you think they'll pay 120 a year, when they wont even pay what, 50? Co'mon son... A lot of the kids on this site, are either, broke, attending school and don't work, or work, and are living pay check to pay check, Maybe their are a few that can throw some money away, but I highly doubt it... Pulse, why don't you create a site an apply that, see where it takes you...

Not throwing shots at you bro, just trying to be logical here...

[Trademark]

This seems like all gravy but reality is, when you are raising prices people will then leave to a free site, Goldmic trying doing this in 03, and hasn't been the same since, charging people more money for an premium account, they finally took it away in 05 and everyone whom left returned to battle... What seems like a good idea, sometimes works out for the worse, think about it, I MEAN WHO IN A LOGICAL MIND, is going to pay 10$ a month for something? the majority of this site is BASIC MEMBERS, what makes you think they'll pay 120 a year, when they wont even pay what, 50? Co'mon son... A lot of the kids on this site, are either, broke, attending school and don't work, or work, and are living pay check to pay check, Maybe their are a few that can throw some money away, but I highly doubt it... Pulse, why don't you create a site an apply that, see where it takes you...

Not throwing shots at you bro, just trying to be logical here...

[Los Briggs]

Originally Posted by MASTR

Only problem with betting though is it would probably increase riders. If there was a reward for being honest or something maybe. Then again people would know who the cheats were and probably not battle them for money.

Exactly. There cheating / dickriding on this site is ridiculous.

But it is a good idea if we can get some truthworthy people behind it.

[Los Briggs]

Originally Posted by MASTR

Only problem with betting though is it would probably increase riders. If there was a reward for being honest or something maybe. Then again people would know who the cheats were and probably not battle them for money.

Exactly. There cheating / dickriding on this site is ridiculous.

But it is a good idea if we can get some truthworthy people behind it.

[Los Briggs]

There was an idea that was thrown about a few months back, where crews were record labels and they earned LB $ for their crew members (artists) wins and there would then be a value for each artist in which you would have to stay within your cap to be able to keep all your members and winning crew battles would pay out the most LB $. Which could be used to ugrade your emcee also crew pages could be upgradeable. Meaning that Super Crews that have Heavyweight emcees would have to remain active to keep all their emcees or they will have to start releasing members due to LB $ restrictions.

What do you guys think?

[Los Briggs]

There was an idea that was thrown about a few months back, where crews were record labels and they earned LB $ for their crew members (artists) wins and there would then be a value for each artist in which you would have to stay within your cap to be able to keep all your members and winning crew battles would pay out the most LB $. Which could be used to ugrade your emcee also crew pages could be upgradeable. Meaning that Super Crews that have Heavyweight emcees would have to remain active to keep all their emcees or they will have to start releasing members due to LB $ restrictions.

What do you guys think?

[Trademark]

Nah, just fix the damn crew battles and so crews can battle for wins an losses... Crew battle set up should be like this,

Crew 1:

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

[vs]

Crew 2:

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

^^^^

So it's more of a collab type shit, the way it's set up as if it's a 1 on 1 sort of thing which IMO, is stupid, crew is supposed to work together in a crew battle which is why the verses should be collaborated. Fixing that shit, will also allow more success to the site, crew vs crew and wins an losses distributed will also provide more comp, and bragging rights as well as more shit talking to claim that NUMBER 1 crew spot...

[Trademark]

Nah, just fix the damn crew battles and so crews can battle for wins an losses... Crew battle set up should be like this,

Crew 1:

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

[vs]

Crew 2:

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

Name:

verse

^^^^

So it's more of a collab type shit, the way it's set up as if it's a 1 on 1 sort of thing which IMO, is stupid, crew is supposed to work together in a crew battle which is why the verses should be collaborated. Fixing that shit, will also allow more success to the site, crew vs crew and wins an losses distributed will also provide more comp, and bragging rights as well as more shit talking to claim that NUMBER 1 crew spot...

[Los Briggs]

its already set up like this, i believe there is a bug that doesnt allow them to close.

[Los Briggs]

its already set up like this, i believe there is a bug that doesnt allow them to close.

[Trademark]

From what I've seen it's not set up in that fashion...

It's more like...

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

--------

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

^^^^^

Basically 1 vs 1 in crew battle format.

[Trademark]

From what I've seen it's not set up in that fashion...

It's more like...

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

--------

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

^^^^^

Basically 1 vs 1 in crew battle format.

[Los Briggs]

Originally Posted by Siccness

From what I've seen it's not set up in that fashion...

It's more like...

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

--------

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

^^^^^

Basically 1 vs 1 in crew battle format.

peep here

http://www.letsbeef.com/crew_battle_...438&section=tb

[Los Briggs]

Originally Posted by Siccness

From what I've seen it's not set up in that fashion...

It's more like...

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

--------

Crew 1

vs

Crew 2

^^^^^

Basically 1 vs 1 in crew battle format.

peep here

http://www.letsbeef.com/crew_battle_...438&section=tb

[Trademark]

niGGa, that's just like I said it was...

It isn't COLLABORATED, which it should be if it's a CREW BATTLE.

[Trademark]

niGGa, that's just like I said it was...

It isn't COLLABORATED, which it should be if it's a CREW BATTLE.