Should there be a crew member limit?

I said APOC has alot of ppl in a other thread, ppl should be able to have as many ppl as they want tho, but having a medium or smaller size crew that is actually dope is way better then having a massive crew of wack dudes.. think of the warriors.. ok so theres 9 in there crew here.. though there actual gang was suppose to be bigger but they took 9 into that mission that night.

I said APOC has alot of ppl in a other thread, ppl should be able to have as many ppl as they want tho, but having a medium or smaller size crew that is actually dope is way better then having a massive crew of wack dudes.. think of the warriors.. ok so theres 9 in there crew here.. though there actual gang was suppose to be bigger but they took 9 into that mission that night.

Originally Posted by Supsie

I said APOC has alot of ppl in a other thread, ppl should be able to have as many ppl as they want tho, but having a medium or smaller size crew that is actually dope is way better then having a massive crew of wack dudes.. think of the warriors.. ok so theres 9 in there crew here.. though there actual gang was suppose to be bigger but they took 9 into that mission that night.

Because they had such a small gang that the second the most lethal gang on the planet rolls up in a bus the Warriors had to run for dear life.

Originally Posted by Supsie

I said APOC has alot of ppl in a other thread, ppl should be able to have as many ppl as they want tho, but having a medium or smaller size crew that is actually dope is way better then having a massive crew of wack dudes.. think of the warriors.. ok so theres 9 in there crew here.. though there actual gang was suppose to be bigger but they took 9 into that mission that night.

Because they had such a small gang that the second the most lethal gang on the planet rolls up in a bus the Warriors had to run for dear life.

[X-Calibur]

I personally don’t think our crew is that big but meh I don’t agree with any of this anyway lol

[X-Calibur]

I personally don’t think our crew is that big but meh I don’t agree with any of this anyway lol

If everyone sticks around what they've currently got, it's not the end of the world. It'd be better if someone like Rant decided to start a rival crew and created a viable alternative, but instead of wants people to be handed ready built crews.

If everyone sticks around what they've currently got, it's not the end of the world. It'd be better if someone like Rant decided to start a rival crew and created a viable alternative, but instead of wants people to be handed ready built crews.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Because they had such a small gang that the second the most lethal gang on the planet rolls up in a bus the Warriors had to run for dear life.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

Because they had such a small gang that the second the most lethal gang on the planet rolls up in a bus the Warriors had to run for dear life.

Originally Posted by Supsie

Birdie would have made Swan his bitch.

Originally Posted by Supsie

Birdie would have made Swan his bitch.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

If everyone sticks around what they've currently got, it's not the end of the world. It'd be better if someone like Rant decided to start a rival crew and created a viable alternative, but instead of wants people to be handed ready built crews.

Why do you think this has anything to do with me being in a crew? I'm already in a crew. I wouldn't even be participating if I held a draft/crew league. I don't compete in ANY competition I run.

Originally Posted by UnEtH1CaL

If everyone sticks around what they've currently got, it's not the end of the world. It'd be better if someone like Rant decided to start a rival crew and created a viable alternative, but instead of wants people to be handed ready built crews.

Why do you think this has anything to do with me being in a crew? I'm already in a crew. I wouldn't even be participating if I held a draft/crew league. I don't compete in ANY competition I run.

Careful, he might throw a temper tantrum.

Careful, he might throw a temper tantrum.

[Student]

I voted no, crews make sense as a group not being able to vote on each others battles and limiting the amount of people only affects the members votes, not anyone else, especially if someone's inactive.

Also, there's no reason why people can't use social groups in a draft.

[Student]

I voted no, crews make sense as a group not being able to vote on each others battles and limiting the amount of people only affects the members votes, not anyone else, especially if someone's inactive.

Also, there's no reason why people can't use social groups in a draft.

Originally Posted by Student

I voted no, crews make sense as a group not being able to vote on each others battles and limiting the amount of people only affects the members votes, not anyone else, especially if someone's inactive.



Also, there's no reason why people can't use social groups in a draft.

The problem is that if crews cant vote on each others battles(I agree, they shouldn't be able to), then by having larger crews(20 membersish) you're restricting not only the number of battles a person in that crew can vote on, but, also the number of votes which that person can receive on their battles.

Originally Posted by Student

I voted no, crews make sense as a group not being able to vote on each others battles and limiting the amount of people only affects the members votes, not anyone else, especially if someone's inactive.



Also, there's no reason why people can't use social groups in a draft.

The problem is that if crews cant vote on each others battles(I agree, they shouldn't be able to), then by having larger crews(20 membersish) you're restricting not only the number of battles a person in that crew can vote on, but, also the number of votes which that person can receive on their battles.