|

10-11-2012, 08:48 AM
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 12,790,265
Mentioned: 2453 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 442 Won / 75 Lost
|
All Staff
The banning of TALLY should be lifted. He has not broke any rules.
You are allowed to use text for audio, it isn't recycling.
@ Pugz @ Mindless @ RULE
http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showt...274#post852274
__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohs
i replied to 14 year old battles to bring back cats who aint around no more
|
|
10-11-2012, 08:48 AM
|
#1
|
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 442 Won / 75 Lost
Join Date: Dec 1969
Voted:
532
audio / 3231
text
Posts: 12,790,265
Mentioned: 2453 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
|
All Staff
The banning of TALLY should be lifted. He has not broke any rules.
You are allowed to use text for audio, it isn't recycling.
@ Pugz @ Mindless @ RULE
http://www.letsbeef.com/forums/showt...274#post852274
__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohs
i replied to 14 year old battles to bring back cats who aint around no more
|
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 10:27 AM
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,541
Mentioned: 1021 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 210 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 1 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 6 Lost
|
What Jason said....
---------- Post added at 10:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:25 AM ----------
Jason has broken it down the best way possible recycling is reusing something again simple as that.
|
10-11-2012, 10:27 AM
|
#2
|
Ranked Audio Record 210 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 1 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 6 Lost
Join Date: Dec 2009
Voted:
1247
audio / 273
text
Posts: 4,541
Mentioned: 1021 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
What Jason said....
---------- Post added at 10:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:25 AM ----------
Jason has broken it down the best way possible recycling is reusing something again simple as that.
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 10:32 AM
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,926
Mentioned: 1840 Post(s)
Tagged: 99 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 6 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 132 Won / 35 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 5 Won / 2 Lost
|
Did you speak to TALLY? @ Murderous Swag
|
10-11-2012, 10:32 AM
|
#3
|
Ranked Audio Record 6 Won / 2 Lost
Ranked Text Record 132 Won / 35 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 5 Won / 2 Lost
Join Date: Dec 2009
Voted:
111
audio / 656
text
Posts: 5,926
Mentioned: 1840 Post(s)
Tagged: 99 Thread(s)
|
Did you speak to TALLY? @ Murderous Swag
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 10:33 AM
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
@ Murderous Swag, I don't see you at fault here in anyway. You did what was proper and consulted a more experienced mod before taking action. @ Jason, I'm with you. Recycling is recycling and I'm not sure how "official" that policy was.
However, Just C and @ Mindless put that out to the public that it was okay to re-use verses/lines across formats. I don't know if or what type of collective staff discussion was held at that time about this or if there was ever any consensus or if it was something that just those two decided.
But the point is A LOT of people on the site as a result are under the impression that this is the policy.
We can decide now whether or not it is okay to recycle across formats (text/audio), but I think TALLY might have been under the impression that it was okay due to the thread by Just C and Mindless referred to above. His ban should be lifted because his confusion on the issue is partly our (staff) fault.
Last edited by NOBLE; 10-11-2012 at 10:35 AM.
|
10-11-2012, 10:33 AM
|
#4
|
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: May 2011
Voted:
408
audio / 1061
text
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
|
@ Murderous Swag, I don't see you at fault here in anyway. You did what was proper and consulted a more experienced mod before taking action. @ Jason, I'm with you. Recycling is recycling and I'm not sure how "official" that policy was.
However, Just C and @ Mindless put that out to the public that it was okay to re-use verses/lines across formats. I don't know if or what type of collective staff discussion was held at that time about this or if there was ever any consensus or if it was something that just those two decided.
But the point is A LOT of people on the site as a result are under the impression that this is the policy.
We can decide now whether or not it is okay to recycle across formats (text/audio), but I think TALLY might have been under the impression that it was okay due to the thread by Just C and Mindless referred to above. His ban should be lifted because his confusion on the issue is partly our (staff) fault.
Last edited by NOBLE; 10-11-2012 at 10:35 AM.
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 11:51 AM
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,541
Mentioned: 1021 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 210 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 1 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 6 Lost
|
Text for video.someone lift his ban I'm at work and let's get some clarity on this asap
|
10-11-2012, 11:51 AM
|
#5
|
Ranked Audio Record 210 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 1 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 6 Lost
Join Date: Dec 2009
Voted:
1247
audio / 273
text
Posts: 4,541
Mentioned: 1021 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
Text for video.someone lift his ban I'm at work and let's get some clarity on this asap
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 12:11 PM
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,923
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
|
Yeah Just C & Mindless brought in that "Text-audio recycling is OK" rule to help increase the audio activity levels.
No-ones really at fault here, although Swag that status is a lil childish lol.
We need to decide whether to continue allowing text-to audio recycling and then publically making a statement either way.
Holla!
|
10-11-2012, 12:11 PM
|
#6
|
Ranked Text Record 99 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Mar 2010
Voted:
67
audio / 906
text
Posts: 24,923
Mentioned: 1635 Post(s)
Tagged: 89 Thread(s)
|
Yeah Just C & Mindless brought in that "Text-audio recycling is OK" rule to help increase the audio activity levels.
No-ones really at fault here, although Swag that status is a lil childish lol.
We need to decide whether to continue allowing text-to audio recycling and then publically making a statement either way.
Holla!
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 12:13 PM
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,541
Mentioned: 1021 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 210 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 1 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 6 Lost
|
I'm voicing my opinion. So u allow recycling to try and boost audio activity....... it didn't work plan failed
|
10-11-2012, 12:13 PM
|
#7
|
Ranked Audio Record 210 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Audio Record 1 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 13 Won / 6 Lost
Join Date: Dec 2009
Voted:
1247
audio / 273
text
Posts: 4,541
Mentioned: 1021 Post(s)
Tagged: 25 Thread(s)
|
I'm voicing my opinion. So u allow recycling to try and boost audio activity....... it didn't work plan failed
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 12:22 PM
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
|
I've actually seen a few people do it recently, including S1 The Sick...so I don't know how much increase in audio/text activity can be attributed to people re-using lines across formats. I agree with RULE. Whatever decision we come up with, we should put out a public statement to let people know.
Cause let's be perfectly honest...
A lot of people that we respect have re-used their written text material in other formats like live battling...including Real Talk, Conceited and Illimit. Personally, I'm with it either way. And if we decide that this form of recycling is no longer permitted, the punishment should not be retroactive...as in anyone caught swapping audio/text verses before the day we state its no longer permissible should not be punished.
|
10-11-2012, 12:22 PM
|
#8
|
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 0 Lost
Ranked Text Record 30 Won / 8 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 1 Won / 1 Lost
Join Date: May 2011
Voted:
408
audio / 1061
text
Posts: 6,105
Mentioned: 3633 Post(s)
Tagged: 76 Thread(s)
|
I've actually seen a few people do it recently, including S1 The Sick...so I don't know how much increase in audio/text activity can be attributed to people re-using lines across formats. I agree with RULE. Whatever decision we come up with, we should put out a public statement to let people know.
Cause let's be perfectly honest...
A lot of people that we respect have re-used their written text material in other formats like live battling...including Real Talk, Conceited and Illimit. Personally, I'm with it either way. And if we decide that this form of recycling is no longer permitted, the punishment should not be retroactive...as in anyone caught swapping audio/text verses before the day we state its no longer permissible should not be punished.
|
Offline
|
|

10-11-2012, 01:50 PM
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 12,790,265
Mentioned: 2453 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 442 Won / 75 Lost
|
There is no one to blame for TALLY being banned, both Swag & Jay acted accordingly.
I just want to make sure we're all on board/up to speed on all rules. Think a proper new thread needs to be made for all this type of stuff, so any new rules/new staff members can read up on it.
__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohs
i replied to 14 year old battles to bring back cats who aint around no more
|
|
10-11-2012, 01:50 PM
|
#9
|
Ranked Audio Record 31 Won / 3 Lost
Ranked Text Record 442 Won / 75 Lost
Join Date: Dec 1969
Voted:
532
audio / 3231
text
Posts: 12,790,265
Mentioned: 2453 Post(s)
Tagged: 114 Thread(s)
|
There is no one to blame for TALLY being banned, both Swag & Jay acted accordingly.
I just want to make sure we're all on board/up to speed on all rules. Think a proper new thread needs to be made for all this type of stuff, so any new rules/new staff members can read up on it.
|
Offline
|
|

10-18-2012, 08:12 AM
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,958
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 51 Thread(s)
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 153 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 3 Won / 0 Lost
|
I was always under the impression you were allowed to, I remember seeing it in the threads a lot of times AND after asking about it I got told I was allowed and I've been here since '06 lol
|
10-18-2012, 08:12 AM
|
#10
|
Live Battler
Ranked Audio Record 4 Won / 1 Lost
Ranked Text Record 153 Won / 28 Lost
Exclusive Text Record 3 Won / 0 Lost
Join Date: Oct 2006
Voted:
0 audio / 1239
text
Posts: 5,958
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 51 Thread(s)
|
I was always under the impression you were allowed to, I remember seeing it in the threads a lot of times AND after asking about it I got told I was allowed and I've been here since '06 lol
|
Offline
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 PM.
|
|
|