should the block function be removed?

It's abused, and possibly(?) broken.

Discuss.

It's abused, and possibly(?) broken.

Discuss.

>voting yes on your own poll to even out the 0-1.
>still being an obese cry bwby

>voting yes on your own poll to even out the 0-1.
>still being an obese cry bwby

Originally Posted by Prince of Dubai

>voting yes on your own poll to even out the 0-1.
>still being an obese cry bwby

I was the first vote.

And I always vote on these polls I post.

I don't even think I'm blocked by anyone important, so, whose behalf am I crying on?

---------- Post added at 09:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 AM ----------

Originally Posted by MC KG

@Row, your verdict please? you got like tha biggest block list on LB

and i think it should have like a limit to how much people you block, for example you ain't gotta block someone with 0 VP cos their vote won't actually count

Blocking people for their voting is a misuse of the block function, in my opinion. As, the primary reason one would do so, would be a vote against themselves. Thus, to block someone for this reason is done to prevent future votes by this person, or a perceived "edge" on the part of the person blocking them.

Blocking should be a function used when, for example, you're being spammed or harassed.

Originally Posted by Prince of Dubai

>voting yes on your own poll to even out the 0-1.
>still being an obese cry bwby

I was the first vote.

And I always vote on these polls I post.

I don't even think I'm blocked by anyone important, so, whose behalf am I crying on?

---------- Post added at 09:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:39 AM ----------

Originally Posted by MC KG

@Row, your verdict please? you got like tha biggest block list on LB

and i think it should have like a limit to how much people you block, for example you ain't gotta block someone with 0 VP cos their vote won't actually count

Blocking people for their voting is a misuse of the block function, in my opinion. As, the primary reason one would do so, would be a vote against themselves. Thus, to block someone for this reason is done to prevent future votes by this person, or a perceived "edge" on the part of the person blocking them.

Blocking should be a function used when, for example, you're being spammed or harassed.

[KG The Prince]

@Row, your verdict please? you got like tha biggest block list on LB

and i think it should have like a limit to how much people you block, for example you ain't gotta block someone with 0 VP cos their vote won't actually count

[KG The Prince]

@Row, your verdict please? you got like tha biggest block list on LB

and i think it should have like a limit to how much people you block, for example you ain't gotta block someone with 0 VP cos their vote won't actually count

Originally Posted by MC KG

@Row, your verdict please? you got like tha biggest block list on LB

and i think it should have like a limit to how much people you block, for example you ain't gotta block someone with 0 VP cos their vote won't actually count

u dont know what the fuck youre talking bout. its you and 2 other dudes. foh kid

@Lizman

Originally Posted by MC KG

@Row, your verdict please? you got like tha biggest block list on LB

and i think it should have like a limit to how much people you block, for example you ain't gotta block someone with 0 VP cos their vote won't actually count

u dont know what the fuck youre talking bout. its you and 2 other dudes. foh kid

@Lizman

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by Row

u dont know what the fuck youre talking bout. its you and 2 other dudes. foh kid

@Lizman

lol what did i do to get blocked? faggot

---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Rant

Generally speaking. Like, for example, I'd block Punk for his repeated attempts at the derailment of these recent threads I've posted. (I can't, because he's a mod.) But, I'd NEVER block someone based on a vote.

I'll posit a secondary question:

Should blocking stop you from voting on that person's battle?

personally i'd say yeh, should be a 2-way thing

and hating in general is different to hating on a battle, because one will affect tha outcome more than tha other

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by Row

u dont know what the fuck youre talking bout. its you and 2 other dudes. foh kid

@Lizman

lol what did i do to get blocked? faggot

---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Rant

Generally speaking. Like, for example, I'd block Punk for his repeated attempts at the derailment of these recent threads I've posted. (I can't, because he's a mod.) But, I'd NEVER block someone based on a vote.

I'll posit a secondary question:

Should blocking stop you from voting on that person's battle?

personally i'd say yeh, should be a 2-way thing

and hating in general is different to hating on a battle, because one will affect tha outcome more than tha other

Originally Posted by MC KG

lol what did i do to get blocked? faggot

for being an ignorant 12 year old loser with a battle IQ equal to jay diamond, unnecessarily and frequently quoting and mentioning me in threads like a groupie. unfortunately blocking doesnt prevent your retarded I.M's. now fuck off. last time i address you

Originally Posted by MC KG

lol what did i do to get blocked? faggot

for being an ignorant 12 year old loser with a battle IQ equal to jay diamond, unnecessarily and frequently quoting and mentioning me in threads like a groupie. unfortunately blocking doesnt prevent your retarded I.M's. now fuck off. last time i address you

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by Row

for being an ignorant 12 year old loser with a battle IQ equal to jay diamond, unnecessarily and frequently quoting and mentioning me in threads like a groupie. unfortunately blocking doesnt prevent your retarded I.M's. now fuck off. last time i address you

you know i can still quote and mention you? you dumb fucka

[KG The Prince]

Originally Posted by Row

for being an ignorant 12 year old loser with a battle IQ equal to jay diamond, unnecessarily and frequently quoting and mentioning me in threads like a groupie. unfortunately blocking doesnt prevent your retarded I.M's. now fuck off. last time i address you

you know i can still quote and mention you? you dumb fucka

[Nerdism]

Originally Posted by Row

for being an ignorant 12 year old loser with a battle IQ equal to jay diamond, unnecessarily and frequently quoting and mentioning me in threads like a groupie. unfortunately blocking doesnt prevent your retarded I.M's. now fuck off. last time i address you

Lmao! Going in on little dude haha
I think the blocking shouldn’t be for votes really kos the VP does it for us but for the people spamming your page an trolling that’s different

[Nerdism]

Originally Posted by Row

for being an ignorant 12 year old loser with a battle IQ equal to jay diamond, unnecessarily and frequently quoting and mentioning me in threads like a groupie. unfortunately blocking doesnt prevent your retarded I.M's. now fuck off. last time i address you

Lmao! Going in on little dude haha
I think the blocking shouldn’t be for votes really kos the VP does it for us but for the people spamming your page an trolling that’s different

Originally Posted by MC KG

because one will affect tha outcome more than tha other

This is exactly the problem.. The block button shouldn't be a feature used to affect the outcomes of the battles AT ALL. This is how's it's being misused. The block button should be a "personal feature." Used to handle any discrepancies you may have with an individual on a personal basis. Therefore, you either shouldn't have the option to block others(because it affects voting/battle outcomes) OR blocking someone should not, then, block them from voting on your battles. But, rather, just you from seeing their posts, their being able to contact you, etc.

Originally Posted by MC KG

because one will affect tha outcome more than tha other

This is exactly the problem.. The block button shouldn't be a feature used to affect the outcomes of the battles AT ALL. This is how's it's being misused. The block button should be a "personal feature." Used to handle any discrepancies you may have with an individual on a personal basis. Therefore, you either shouldn't have the option to block others(because it affects voting/battle outcomes) OR blocking someone should not, then, block them from voting on your battles. But, rather, just you from seeing their posts, their being able to contact you, etc.