Do you think the next LBT Card...? (Mods/LBT Heads)

[GOOD GRIEF]

... Should have incentive? By that I mean the winners of the next card get auto invites to the GC. Tbh I don't want to go through the bullshit of snipe season and I'm sure you don't either.

So I propose that as long as everyone participates, sends on time, wins, and haven't had a bad history of no shows they should be auto invited. You can make it "if you win 2 out of three of your battles you're in" rules if you want more than one battle to qualify but that'll just burn people out before the tourney. Thoughts?

[GOOD GRIEF]

... Should have incentive? By that I mean the winners of the next card get auto invites to the GC. Tbh I don't want to go through the bullshit of snipe season and I'm sure you don't either.

So I propose that as long as everyone participates, sends on time, wins, and haven't had a bad history of no shows they should be auto invited. You can make it "if you win 2 out of three of your battles you're in" rules if you want more than one battle to qualify but that'll just burn people out before the tourney. Thoughts?

Why not just make it simple. Winners of battles on the LBT card for August will automatically qualify. I would appreciate it if we could have the same incentive for the ETK if this goes ahead. Good idea.

Why not just make it simple. Winners of battles on the LBT card for August will automatically qualify. I would appreciate it if we could have the same incentive for the ETK if this goes ahead. Good idea.

To be fair, in 2014 Snipe Season = 1-0

To be fair, in 2014 Snipe Season = 1-0

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

... Should have incentive? By that I mean the winners of the next card get auto invites to the GC. Tbh I don't want to go through the bullshit of snipe season and I'm sure you don't either.

So I propose that as long as everyone participates, sends on time, wins, and haven't had a bad history of no shows they should be auto invited. You can make it "if you win 2 out of three of your battles you're in" rules if you want more than one battle to qualify but that'll just burn people out before the tourney. Thoughts?

Hmmmm... Ok, i can level with you on that one. Although, i think is shouldn't count for everyone/all the #'s in the LBT to get into the GC as there will be ppl who aren't in the LBT who will want into the GC.

Though i do like this idea. And lets be honest. A few extra battles in the LBT or get that sniper rifle out... one or the other, like... Think if you win 2-2 in the LBT next month you get into the GC automatically. I find that fair for those who forgot where they put that rifle.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

... Should have incentive? By that I mean the winners of the next card get auto invites to the GC. Tbh I don't want to go through the bullshit of snipe season and I'm sure you don't either.

So I propose that as long as everyone participates, sends on time, wins, and haven't had a bad history of no shows they should be auto invited. You can make it "if you win 2 out of three of your battles you're in" rules if you want more than one battle to qualify but that'll just burn people out before the tourney. Thoughts?

Hmmmm... Ok, i can level with you on that one. Although, i think is shouldn't count for everyone/all the #'s in the LBT to get into the GC as there will be ppl who aren't in the LBT who will want into the GC.

Though i do like this idea. And lets be honest. A few extra battles in the LBT or get that sniper rifle out... one or the other, like... Think if you win 2-2 in the LBT next month you get into the GC automatically. I find that fair for those who forgot where they put that rifle.

I'm confused, people are talking about multiple battles in the LBT. Surely LBT is one battle per monthly card?

I'm confused, people are talking about multiple battles in the LBT. Surely LBT is one battle per monthly card?

[GOOD GRIEF]

I still think more than one serious battle could burn someone out before the tourney.

[GOOD GRIEF]

I still think more than one serious battle could burn someone out before the tourney.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

I still think more than one serious battle could burn someone out before the tourney.

Not really... if anything it'd be practice for the tourney. It's the GC, so if "one battle burns someone out" they have fuck all chance of advancing in the tournament.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by GOOD GRIEF

I still think more than one serious battle could burn someone out before the tourney.

Not really... if anything it'd be practice for the tourney. It's the GC, so if "one battle burns someone out" they have fuck all chance of advancing in the tournament.

[AfterThought]

Don't think you can have more than 1 battle on a single LBT card...?


EDIT: It's never happened before, & would fuck up the LBT imo.

[AfterThought]

Don't think you can have more than 1 battle on a single LBT card...?


EDIT: It's never happened before, & would fuck up the LBT imo.

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by AfterThought

Don't think you can have more than 1 battle on a single LBT card...?


EDIT: It's never happened before, & would fuck up the LBT imo.

Yeah that's actually true... Better off getting them snipers out then lol

[Óðinn]

Originally Posted by AfterThought

Don't think you can have more than 1 battle on a single LBT card...?


EDIT: It's never happened before, & would fuck up the LBT imo.

Yeah that's actually true... Better off getting them snipers out then lol

[GOOD GRIEF]

Either this or we AT LEAST have a "Hunting Lodge" full of voters dedicated to making sure battles at least get enough votes as not to get slept on. Not just the FVC cuz they'll be swamped. @2FUEL

[GOOD GRIEF]

Either this or we AT LEAST have a "Hunting Lodge" full of voters dedicated to making sure battles at least get enough votes as not to get slept on. Not just the FVC cuz they'll be swamped. @2FUEL