| |
03-15-2013, 07:13 AM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Spacetime Foam.
Is spacetime foam the bound state of time?
Discuss.
|
|
03-15-2013, 07:13 AM
|
#1
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Spacetime Foam.
Is spacetime foam the bound state of time?
Discuss.
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 03:16 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Yo, lemme hit that?
|
|
03-15-2013, 03:16 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Yo, lemme hit that?
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 04:58 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Do you have a prescription?
|
|
03-15-2013, 04:58 PM
|
#3
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Do you have a prescription?
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 09:39 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Shutup
|
|
03-15-2013, 09:39 PM
|
#4
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Shutup
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 09:45 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Because you're too stupid to understand?
|
|
03-15-2013, 09:45 PM
|
#5
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Because you're too stupid to understand?
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 09:56 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
you asked about a hypothetical that no one really understands because its all theory, and then call people stupid. Get off that high horse fam. You're not a quantum theorist.
|
|
03-15-2013, 09:56 PM
|
#6
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
you asked about a hypothetical that no one really understands because its all theory, and then call people stupid. Get off that high horse fam. You're not a quantum theorist.
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:08 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLNK
Because you're too stupid to understand?
|
Yah, that's it
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLNK
Because you're too stupid to understand?
|
Yah, that's it
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:14 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Theory necessitates a lack of understanding? @ SluggoVonPunch
Let me rephrase: Because something is theoretical, it is then inherently misunderstood by all parties?
Last edited by BLNK; 03-15-2013 at 10:17 PM.
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:14 PM
|
#8
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Theory necessitates a lack of understanding? @ SluggoVonPunch
Let me rephrase: Because something is theoretical, it is then inherently misunderstood by all parties?
Last edited by BLNK; 03-15-2013 at 10:17 PM.
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:39 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Yeah actually. And those parties understand that they don't understand it. If they understood it, it would be scientific fact. Understand?
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:39 PM
|
#9
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Yeah actually. And those parties understand that they don't understand it. If they understood it, it would be scientific fact. Understand?
|
|
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:46 PM
|
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Understanding equates to fact? I understand the theory of evolution, but, is it not still only a theory? It's the same principle with spacetime foam, it's widely regarded as an existent property, despite there being no firm grasp of quantum gravity, thus no conceptualization of the property in a visual regard.
Again, let me rephrase. No strong basis for it's visual conceptualization.
Last edited by BLNK; 03-15-2013 at 10:50 PM.
|
|
03-15-2013, 10:46 PM
|
#10
|
|
Guest
Voted:
0 audio / 0 text
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
|
Understanding equates to fact? I understand the theory of evolution, but, is it not still only a theory? It's the same principle with spacetime foam, it's widely regarded as an existent property, despite there being no firm grasp of quantum gravity, thus no conceptualization of the property in a visual regard.
Again, let me rephrase. No strong basis for it's visual conceptualization.
Last edited by BLNK; 03-15-2013 at 10:50 PM.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.
|
|
|
Linear Mode
