yes just c, you are right

[Insuppressible]

you're wrong mate ......

that verse has been reposted countless of times before ..... i picked that link because it was the clearest for everyone to view the date ...... plus it doesn't have to be on a rap battle site for it to be counted as a bite; in this case it was reposted by different people on different sites ...... More than enough to accuse him of biting ....

you don't have to oppose everythin mate, cos you sounded like a fool

you know what i'm talkin about

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:00 PM ----------

plus even if that was him recycling, wouldn't he have at least defended that it was 'his verse' .... common sense

[Insuppressible]

you're wrong mate ......

that verse has been reposted countless of times before ..... i picked that link because it was the clearest for everyone to view the date ...... plus it doesn't have to be on a rap battle site for it to be counted as a bite; in this case it was reposted by different people on different sites ...... More than enough to accuse him of biting ....

you don't have to oppose everythin mate, cos you sounded like a fool

you know what i'm talkin about

---------- Post added at 07:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:00 PM ----------

plus even if that was him recycling, wouldn't he have at least defended that it was 'his verse' .... common sense

[Just C]

A) Prove it had been used multiple times.

And if it haaaaaaaaaad

B) next time why don't you EXPLAIN on the battle that it had been used multiple times, with PROOF?

It's all very well accusing others of being a "Fool" but when you don't provide the evidence the only fool is you. Don't blame me because you couldn't be fucked providing Un disputable proof.

People go off what is presented to them. They don't have the ability to read minds, not even mods.

---------- Post added at 08:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:26 PM ----------

And how can he defend himself if he's BANNED? Would this be via another form of phsycic ability you expect us all to posses?

[Just C]

A) Prove it had been used multiple times.

And if it haaaaaaaaaad

B) next time why don't you EXPLAIN on the battle that it had been used multiple times, with PROOF?

It's all very well accusing others of being a "Fool" but when you don't provide the evidence the only fool is you. Don't blame me because you couldn't be fucked providing Un disputable proof.

People go off what is presented to them. They don't have the ability to read minds, not even mods.

---------- Post added at 08:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:26 PM ----------

And how can he defend himself if he's BANNED? Would this be via another form of phsycic ability you expect us all to posses?

[Insuppressible]

its preposterous mate .... im sorry, why the hell should anyone have to provide more than one link? The first thought that came to mind was bitten, moreso it wasn't even his name posted on that link. I highly doubt it was an 'innocent' recycle.

his only comment before he was banned was 'who?' .... so he had time to say 'that was me', or at least defend himself.

[Insuppressible]

its preposterous mate .... im sorry, why the hell should anyone have to provide more than one link? The first thought that came to mind was bitten, moreso it wasn't even his name posted on that link. I highly doubt it was an 'innocent' recycle.

his only comment before he was banned was 'who?' .... so he had time to say 'that was me', or at least defend himself.

[Just C]

BECAUSE HE GOT BANNED

If you're going to do this do it properly, if only to cover your own back and save you any hassle, provide proof. I'm sorry but I don't go off he said she said, or guessing games, I go off proof. The law goes off proof.

"I hear by sentence you to death.

But why where's the proof I committed a crime?

That's preposterous mate, why should I provide proof?"

I didn't even read the rest of what you said because the first line is so ridiculous.

Provide what ever evidence you have. End of story. Jesus.

[Just C]

BECAUSE HE GOT BANNED

If you're going to do this do it properly, if only to cover your own back and save you any hassle, provide proof. I'm sorry but I don't go off he said she said, or guessing games, I go off proof. The law goes off proof.

"I hear by sentence you to death.

But why where's the proof I committed a crime?

That's preposterous mate, why should I provide proof?"

I didn't even read the rest of what you said because the first line is so ridiculous.

Provide what ever evidence you have. End of story. Jesus.

[Insuppressible]

im not trying to defend myself .... we all make mistakes, i can acknowledge that, but i believe i made no mistake here to accuse him of biting .....

/////

---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:40 PM ----------

yeh, and you know what ..... his only comment before he was banned was 'who?' .... so he had time to say 'that was me', or at least defend himself.

[Insuppressible]

im not trying to defend myself .... we all make mistakes, i can acknowledge that, but i believe i made no mistake here to accuse him of biting .....

/////

---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:40 PM ----------

yeh, and you know what ..... his only comment before he was banned was 'who?' .... so he had time to say 'that was me', or at least defend himself.

[Just C]

What does it matter If he said Who? Judging by the bars he posted he isn't a very bright person to begin with, and he was banned pretty much right after that. And if you had provided the full proof it wouldn't matter what he had to say anyway. Just provide all the proof you have. It's not difficult. Can you do that from now on or is that too much to ask?

Because you did make a mistake. You could very well be right that he bit, I never once disputed that, I asked you on the battle how did you know he bit

(And guess what, you went offline, no explanation, so what Stephen? you can go offline and not answer to me and it's alright? but he goes offline, doesn't answer you, and it's suspect? Maybe he had to log off)

and what I did say to staff is that he more than likely recycled as a noob and made a mistake. And why is that Stephen?

Because you wasn't clear enough, you left your self open to questioning and caused confusion and doubt across the board because you was far too vague.

And I still want to see this proof of this particular shitty 4 liner being used multiple times.

[Just C]

What does it matter If he said Who? Judging by the bars he posted he isn't a very bright person to begin with, and he was banned pretty much right after that. And if you had provided the full proof it wouldn't matter what he had to say anyway. Just provide all the proof you have. It's not difficult. Can you do that from now on or is that too much to ask?

Because you did make a mistake. You could very well be right that he bit, I never once disputed that, I asked you on the battle how did you know he bit

(And guess what, you went offline, no explanation, so what Stephen? you can go offline and not answer to me and it's alright? but he goes offline, doesn't answer you, and it's suspect? Maybe he had to log off)

and what I did say to staff is that he more than likely recycled as a noob and made a mistake. And why is that Stephen?

Because you wasn't clear enough, you left your self open to questioning and caused confusion and doubt across the board because you was far too vague.

And I still want to see this proof of this particular shitty 4 liner being used multiple times.

[IV]

If Stephen aint battling NOOBS (YOU A SNIPER) he sat on YOUTUBE WITH CYPHERS trying to PROVE YOU A BITER

^^ one personal to sum up Stephen.

No offence tho, literally nothing against you lmao

[IV]

If Stephen aint battling NOOBS (YOU A SNIPER) he sat on YOUTUBE WITH CYPHERS trying to PROVE YOU A BITER

^^ one personal to sum up Stephen.

No offence tho, literally nothing against you lmao

[Insuppressible]

alot of speculation so we'll never know .... at the end of the day, i did assume he bit .... After lookin deeper into the other links, zacfresh was the person who posted on all the links the same verse .... So maybe 'space1' or w/e is zachfresh, we'll never know .... If he ever admits he is zachfresh, i will not believe him .... I still stand with my judgement that he did bite such a whack verse .... Next time, its best if i just let biters bite and recyclers recycle there verses ...

[Insuppressible]

alot of speculation so we'll never know .... at the end of the day, i did assume he bit .... After lookin deeper into the other links, zacfresh was the person who posted on all the links the same verse .... So maybe 'space1' or w/e is zachfresh, we'll never know .... If he ever admits he is zachfresh, i will not believe him .... I still stand with my judgement that he did bite such a whack verse .... Next time, its best if i just let biters bite and recyclers recycle there verses ...

[Just C]

Originally Posted by Insuppressiible

at the end of the day, i did assume he bit ....So maybe 'space1' or w/e is zachfresh

That's all you had to say.

Title changed.

Thread closed.

Sigged.

[Just C]

Originally Posted by Insuppressiible

at the end of the day, i did assume he bit ....So maybe 'space1' or w/e is zachfresh

That's all you had to say.

Title changed.

Thread closed.

Sigged.

[Insuppressible]

haha, the fact you still haven't unbanned him shows doubt in your mind .... weak

[Insuppressible]

haha, the fact you still haven't unbanned him shows doubt in your mind .... weak